of equilibration, the samples were illuminated with 254 nm
light to photoactivate AX7593 and tag any complexed
enzyme. Unreacted probe was separated from EGFR using
SDS-PAGE, and the fluorescent signal of TAMRA tagged
EGFR was measured using a flatbed gel scanner. Because
the degree of photoaffinity labeling is directly proportional
to the amount of probe bound prior to irradiation, the Kb
(binding constant) value could be calculated and was
determined to be 280 ( 13 nM. As a control experiment,
AX7593 (1 µM) was photoactivated in the presence of Akt1,
MAPKAP kinase 2, and Cdk2, and no labeling of these
kinases was observed.
The ability of the probe to inhibit the EGFR-catalyzed
phosphorylation of poly(Glu-Ala-Tyr) with [γ-32P]-ATP was
also examined.12 EGFR activity, as measured by the incor-
poration of 32Pi into the peptide substrate, was plotted versus
the concentration of AX7593 (0.01 µM to 10 µM, Figure
1). When the resultant curve was fit to a four-parameter Hill
Figure 2. Inhibition of AX7593 labeling of EGFR by PP2 (b)
and AG1478 (O) at various concentrations. The curves drawn are
the best fit of the data to a four-parameter Hill function, which
yielded IC50 values of 210 ( 53 nM and 8.0 ( 1.8 nM for PP2
and AG1478, respectively.
AX7593 was assigned as 34%. The labeling efficiencies of
aryl azide-containing photoaffinity probes are known to vary
widely from single digit percentages to near quantitative
values.13
Next, labeling experiments in the presence of EGFR
inhibitors were performed to determine if AX7593 could be
used to assay for small-molecule inhibition (Figure 2).14 Two
known EGFR inhibitors, PP2 (IC50 ) 480 nM)15 and AG1478
(IC50 ) 7 nM),16 were used as model compounds. After
incubation of EGFR (10 nM) with varying concentrations
of both inhibitors (0.5-10 000 nM), AX7593 (2 µM) was
added and the probe was photoactivated at 254 nm. When
the percent inhibition of photoaffinity labeling was plotted
as a function of inhibitor concentration and the resulting
curves were fitted to a four-parameter Hill function, the
calculated IC50 values for PP2 (IC50 ) 210 ( 53 nM) and
AG1478 (IC50 ) 8.0 ( 1.8 nM) were in close agreement
with literature values.
Figure 1. Inhibition of EGFR kinase activity by AX7593. The
curve drawn is the best fit of the data to a four-parameter Hill
function, which yielded an IC50 value of 350 ( 20 nM.
In summary, we developed a route for the synthesis of
AX7593, a quinazoline-based photoaffinity probe for EGFR.
Importantly, small-molecule competition of AX7593 pho-
tolabeling was shown to be a useful method of extracting
EGFR IC50 values. Such inhibition of photoaffinity labeling
has the potential to be adapted to a nonradioactive, high-
throughput screening method of new compounds as inhibitors
of EGFR. The linear nature of the synthesis described herein
function, the IC50 of AX7593 for EGFR was calculated to
be 350 ( 20 nM, a value in good agreement with the binding
constant determined by photoaffinity labeling (vide supra).
To determine the labeling efficiency of AX7593 (i.e., the
percentage of probe-complexed enzyme that is covalently
tagged), a calibration curve was generated from the labeling
of trypsin with a TAMRA-containing serine hydrolase fluoro-
phosphonate probe. Use of this calibration curve allowed the
amount of TAMRA fluorescence visualized using SDS-
PAGE to be correlated to the absolute quantity of labeled
enzyme. When EGFR was labeled by AX7593, it was de-
termined that the amount of TAMRA fluorescence observed
was 66% less than expected for the complete labeling of
AX7593-bound EGFR. Thus, the labeling efficiency of
(13) Bayley, H.; Knowles, J. R. Methods Enzymol. 1977, 46, 69-114.
(14) TAMRA-tagged activity-based probes have been shown to be useful
in the high-throughput screening of small molecule inhibitors directly in
proteomes. See: (a) Nomanbhoy, T. K.; Rosenblum, J.; Aban, A.; Burbaum,
J. J. Assay Drug DeV. Technol. 2003, 1 (2), 137-146. (b) Leung, D.;
Hardouin, C.; Boger, D. L.; Cravatt, B. F. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003 21 (6),
687-691.
(15) Hanke, J. H.; Gardner, J. P.; Dow, R. L.; Changelian, P. S.; Brissette,
W. H.; Weringer, E. J.; Pollok, B. A.; Connelly, P. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1996,
695-701.
(16) (a) Levitzki, A.; Gazit, A. Science 1995, 267, 1782-1788. (b)
Osherov, N.; Levitzki, A. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 225, 1047-1053.
(12) Koland, J. G.; Cerione, R. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263 (5), 2230-
2237.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 21, 2004
3717