internal triple bond.12 With (-)-8 in hand, removal of the
PMB groups, followed by a second Fraser-Reid10 protocol
led to epoxide (+)-9. Reagent-controlled diastereoselective
epoxidation exploiting the elegant Shi conditions13 furnished
a mixture of diastereomers (12:1), which upon HPLC
purification afforded the requisite cyclization precursor bis-
epoxide (+)-3 (41%, 64% BORSM).
We initiated cyclization studies with the expectation of
retention of configuration based on the precedent of Mukai,
Hanaoka, and co-workers.4 To this end, treatment of (+)-3
with 1.1 equiv of Co2(CO)8 at ambient temperature, followed
at -78 °C by a catalytic amount of BF3‚OEt2, yielded
alkyne-cobalt complex (+)-11 (Scheme 4). Importantly, the
OEt2 reaction conditions did not result in any change, thus
suggesting that the cyclizations proceed under kinetic control.
Based on the X-ray crystal structure of (+)-11, we
reasoned that the steric bulk of the cobalt complex might
disfavor the desired 6-exo-tet pathway. To reduce the steric
incumbrance, as well as to attenuate the ease of epimeriza-
tion, we removed the cobalt moiety from the alkyne prior to
attempting the second cyclization (Scheme 4). This three-
step operation, performed in a single flask, furnished epoxide
(-)-15 in 88% yield.
Scheme 4
With epoxide (-)-15 in hand, ring opening of the second
epoxide was reinvestigated (Table 1). Initially, we explored
Table 1. Examining the 6-exo- and 7-endo-tet Cyclizations of
(-)-15
t
time
(h)
(-)-16/ convb
entry
conditionsa
(°C)
(-)-17b
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CSA (0.1 equiv)
BF3‚OEt2 (0.1 equiv) -78 25
BF3‚OEt2 (0.1 equiv)
BF3‚OEt2 (0.1 equiv)
BF3‚OEt2 (1.0 equiv) -78
BF3‚OEt2 (2.0 equiv) -78
BF3‚OEt2 (2.0 equiv)
5 M LiClO4‚OEt2,
CSA (0.1 equiv)
25 28
1:1
1:6
1:1
1:1
1:3
1:3
1:1
1:1.1
97
10
100
100
80
93
100
10
reaction proceeded with complete chemoselectivity at the
activated propargylic epoxide. Single-crystal X-ray analysis
verified that the first epoxide opening had indeed proceeded
with retention of stereochemistry.14
0
1
40
0.5
1
0.75
0.3
1.5
To determine the feasibility of performing the second
epoxide opening without isolation of (+)-11, we explored a
variety of added acids and bases. Unexpectedly, (+)-11 failed
to produce any of the desired bicycle resulting from 6-exo-
tet cyclization. Instead, with either CSA or PPTS, only
selective formation of bicycle (-)-12, resulting from 7-endo-
tet cyclization, was observed! Surprisingly, treatment of (+)-
11 with BF3‚OEt2 led to mixtures of the 7-membered bicycle
(-)-12, along with the 6- and 7-membered bicycles (-)-13
and (-)-14, respectively, both epimerized at the propargylic
center! Bicycles (-)-12, (-)-13, and (-)-14 were distin-
0
25
a Entries 1-7 were run in CH2Cl2. b Ratios and conversions determined
by 500 MHz H NMR.
1
the cyclization under “standard” acidic conditions (see entries
1-7, Table 1). Unlike cobalt complex (+)-11, exposure of
(-)-15 to either CSA or BF3‚OEt2 furnished the desired
6-exo-tet product (-)-16, albeit at best as a mixture (ca. 1:1)
with the 7-endo-tet bicycle (-)-17. Importantly, no epimer-
ized products were observed. Attempts to increase this ratio
with other Lewis acids (ca. TiCl4 or CeCl3) or under basic
conditions (ca. KH, DMSO) proved unsuccessful. In an
attempt to increase the amount of carbocation character in
the ring-opening transition state, anticipated to favor attack
at the epoxide secondary carbon, we explored the extremely
polar solvent system of Grieco and co-workers15 (LiClO4‚
OEt2) (see entry 8, Table 1). Although these conditions
dramatically increased the reaction rate (entry 1 vs 8, Table
1), the ratio of (-)-16 to (-)-17 did not improve.
1
guishable through H, COSY, and D2O exchange experi-
ments. Reexposure of the individual bicycles to the BF3‚
(10) (a) Hicks, D. R.; Fraser-Reid, B. Synthesis 1974, 203. (b) Cink, R.
D.; Forsyth, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 8122.
(11) (a) Holmes, A. B.; Jennings-White, C. L. D.; Schulthess, A. H.
Chem. Commun. 1979, 840. (b) Holmes, A. B.; Jones, G. E. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1980, 21, 3111.
(12) Doolittle, R. E. Synthesis 1984, 730.
(13) (a) Wang, Z.-X.; Tu, Y.; Frohn, M.; Zhang, J.-R.; Shi, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11224. (b) Wang, Z.-X.; Cao, G.-A.; Shi, Y. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 7646.
(14) For a mechanistic explanation of this double-inversion process see
ref 5b.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 9, 2004
1479