Please do not adjust margins
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Page 4 of 5
ARTICLE
Journal Name
Table 2: Cyclotrimerization of methyl propiolate
evidence for cyclotrimerization. Field et al. showed for a series
of Co(I), Rh(I) and Ir(I) catalysts that phenylacetylene can be
cyclotrimerized as well as dimerized.28 Steric and electronic
effects of the ligand system as well as the substrate influence
the regioselectivity of the cyclotrimerization. If steric and
electronic effects are minimized regioselectivity with the
statistical ratio of approximately 3:1 favoring the 1,2,4‐
substituted benzene derivative will be observed. The
cyclotrimerization of phenylacetylene showed similar regio‐
selectivities with approximately 2:1 favoring the 1,2,4‐
DOI: 10.1039/C8OB01369A
Entrya
1b
2c
Catalyst
4 (1)
A/Be
68/32
1/99
1/99
Conv.f [%]
19
40
39
FhuA (0.1)
6 (0.1)
3d
a) V = 0.5 mL, 60 °C; b) a stock solution of 4 (0.1 M in THF); c) 22 mM methyl propiolate;
d) 22 mM methyl propiolate; e) determined by GC MS with a minimum of three runs, int.
std.: mesitylene (1.0 mL, 15 mM in THF) errors are standard deviation: selectivity = ±4%;
f) determined by 1H NMR; int. std. acetone (4 µL), error: conversion = ±5%;
triphenylbenzene. Neither
regioselectivity. Catalyst
cobalt(I) catalyst used by Butenschön et al. in aqueous media
show similar regioselectivities.29 In contrast to catalyst
(ethanol/water mixture; 3:2)19 and the ( 5‐cyclopentadienyl)
4
2
nor
and the (
6
showed large effects on the
5‐cyclopentadienyl)‐
2
cobalt(I) catalyst (methanol/water mixture; 1:4) used by
Conclusion
Butenschön et al.29 we decreased the amount of organic co‐
A
modified
(
5‐cyclopentadienyl)cobalt(I) catalyst was
solvent necessary by incorporating catalyst
4 in the protein
anchored in the engineered transmembrane protein FhuA
ΔCVFtev with a cysteine anchoring site C545 and characterized
by MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry and CD spectroscopy. The
cyclotrimerization of phenylacetylene with the water‐soluble
scaffold to obtain water‐soluble biohybrid catalyst
6
.
Several other terminal alkynes of varying water‐solubility were
tested in the cyclotrimerization under conditions shown in
Table 1 (ESI, Table S4). Propargyl alcohol, N,N‐dimethyl‐2‐
propynylamine, N,N,N‐trimethyl‐2‐propynyl ammonium iodide,
propiolamide and 5‐hexynenitile did not show any conversion
biohybrid catalyst
6 gave a 2:1 mixture of 1,2,4‐ and 1,3,5‐
triphenylbenzenes. The regioselectivity appears to be not
affected by the protein environment, as the formation of the
intermediate cobaltacyclopentadiene (“cobaltole”) seems to be
not influenced by the bioconjugation.
with catalyst
Regarding the activity, catalyst
cyclotrimerization of phenylacetylene.19 With respect to
phenylacetylene and did not show any difference in activity
or selectivity. Butenschön et al. observed TON’s up to 17 (5
mol%, 8 h, rt, TOF = 2.1 h‐1) for phenylacetylene.17 Catalyst
(5
mol%, 24 h, 60 °C, TOF = 0.2 h‐1) showed low activity even at
4 or 6.
2
was not used for the
2
4
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
elevated temperatures. The metalloprotein
6 (0.1 mol%, 24 h,
60 °C, TOF = 5.4 h‐1) on the other hand were not active, but due
to low catalyst concentrations activity increased in aqueous
media with TON’s up to 130.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the International
Research Training Group “Selectivity in Chemo‐ and
Biocatalysis”. We thank Profs. Hayashi and Onoda for various
discussions.
Acetylenes with a carbonyl group in α‐position to the C‐C triple
bond were converted with
4 as well. Methyl propiolate for
example showed a regioselectivity of 68:32 favoring the
1,2,4‐substituted benzene derivative (Table 2, Entry 1).
Biohybrid catalyst
6 selectively converted methyl propiolate
into the 1,3,5‐substituted benzene derivative (>99%) (Table 2,
Entry 3). Other acetylenes bearing a carbonyl group in the
α‐position such as ethyl propiolate or tert‐butyl propiolate
showed the same selectivity. Since FhuA without any metal co‐
References
1. J. C. Lewis, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2015, 25, 27‐35.
2. J. Collot, J. Gradinaru, N. Humbert, M. Skander, A. Zocchi and T.
R. Ward, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9030‐9031.
factor showed similar activity and selectivity as did catalyst
6
(Table 2, Entry 2‐3) it became apparent that the metal catalyst 3. F. Schwizer, Y. Okamoto, T. Heinisch, Y. Gu, M. M. Pellizzoni, V.
Lebrun, R. Reuter, V. Köhler, J. C. Lewis and T. R. Ward, Chem.
Rev., 2018, 118, 142‐231.
4. T. Matsuo and S. Hirota, Bioorganic Med. Chem., 2014, 22, 5638‐
may not be involved in the cyclotrimerization of methyl
propiolate. Previously, primary and secondary amines were
reported to act as organo catalysts.30‐32 Acetylenes bearing a
Michael‐acceptor in α‐position undergo triple Michael‐type
addition leading exclusively to the 1,3,5‐regioisomer. The
protein catalyzes these substrates and therefore the metal
complex does not participate in the reaction. Experiments with
5656.
5. J. Steinreiber and T. R. Ward, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2008, 252, 751‐
766.
6. F. Rosati and G. Roelfes, ChemCatChem, 2010, 2, 916‐927.
7. M. E. Wilson and G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100,
306‐307.
8. K. Fukumoto, A. Onoda, E. Mizohata, M. Bocola, T. Inoue, U.
Schwaneberg and T. Hayashi, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, 1229‐
1235.
L
‐lysine and L‐histidine as c amino acids support this suggestion
by converting methyl propiolate exclusively to the 1,3,5‐
substituted regioisomer (ESI, Table S3).
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1‐3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins