influence of the counter ion on the palladium pre-catalyst and
observed faster reactions with weakly coordinating counter-
In summary, the introduction of easy-to-handle coupling
reagents as activating agents for acids in transition-metal
catalysis led to the discovery of a convenient new ketone
synthesis from carboxylic acids and boronic acids. Further
applications of this new concept, for example, in the reduction
of carboxylic acids to aldehydes or the Heck reaction of benzoic
acid derivatives are under current investigation.
2
ions such as NO3 or F6-acac than with stronger coordinating
Cl2 (Entries 16–20).10 Under the reaction conditions, the
boronic acids act as the reducing agents for the palladium so that
biaryls are formed in small quantities. With dba3Pd2 as a pre-
catalyst, lower yields were observed, which may be due to an
insufficient dissociation of the dba from Pd(0). The presence of
small quantities of water has little effect on the reaction
outcome so that it is not necessary to dry the reagents or
solvents, however, the presence of a large excess of water was
found to lower the yields (Entries 13–15).
We thank M. Rössig and L. Winkel for technical assistance
and Professor Dr M. T. Reetz for generous support and constant
encouragement.
We then set out to combine the activation of the carboxylic
acid with di(N-succinimidyl) carbonate and the transformation
to the ketone into a convenient one-pot procedure (Scheme 3).†
Since the activation of the acid was found to proceed smoothly
within a few minutes in THF in the presence of Na2CO3, this
was easily accomplished: in a typical procedure, all reagents
except the boronic acid are dissolved in THF and the mixture is
stirred until the CO2 evolution has ceased. Then, the boronic
acid is added and the reaction is heated until complete
conversion. Under these conditions F6-acac gave best results,
and it is beneficial to add a slight excess of the phosphine to
make up for losses during the first reaction step. The water-
soluble by-products N-hydroxysuccinimide and boric acid are
easily removed by a single water wash.
In order to test the generality of this protocol, we applied it to
a variety of different substrates. Table 2 shows the broad scope
of the new transformation. Both electron-rich and electron-poor
alkyl, aryl and even heteroaryl carboxylic acids work equally
well, many functional groups such as keto, cyano, ester, nitro,
amido and even hydroxy groups are tolerated, and no side
products arising from enolisation of the keto groups were
observed in significant quantities.
Notes and references
† Synthesis of 2-(4A-methoxyphenyl) ethylphenyl ketone (3e): a 100 mL flask
was charged with palladium hexafluoroacetylacetonate (156 mg, 0.30
mmol), tricyclohexylphosphine (252 mg, 0.90 mmol), 3-phenylpropionic
acid (2e) (1.50 g, 10.0 mmol), Na2CO3 (2.08 g, 20.0 mmol), and di(N-
succinimidyl) carbonate (3.33 g, 13.0 mmol). The reaction vessel was
purged with argon and degassed THF (30 mL) was added. The yellow
mixture was stirred at 60 °C for a few minutes until the gas evolution had
ceased. Then, the solution was cooled down to RT, a solution of
4-methoxyphenylboronic acid (1a) (1.82 g, 12.0 mmol) in THF (30 mL)
was added and the purple reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C overnight.
The reaction slurry was then poured into water (300 mL) and extracted 3
times with 100 mL portions of ethyl acetate. The combined organic layers
were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and the volatiles were removed in vacuo.
The residue was adsorbed on a plug of Al2O3. Nonpolar impurities such as
the phosphine or the biaryl were removed by elution with hexane. The
product (2.19 g, 91%) was then eluted with 20% ethyl acetate in hexane. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d = 7.93 (d, 3J (H,H) = 9 Hz, 2H),
7.23–7.19 (m, 5H), 6.92 (d, 3J (H,H) = 9 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.24 (t, 3J
(H,H) = 7 Hz, 2H), 3.06 (t, 3J (H,H) = 7 Hz, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d = 197.8, 163.5, 141.5, 130.3, 130.0, 128.5, 128.4,
126.1, 113.7, 55.5, 40.1, 30.3 ppm; MS (70 eV): m/z (%): 240 (33) [M+],
135 (100), 121 (2), 107 (6), 92 (8), 77 (13); HRMS: calcd. for C16H16O2
[M+]: 240.115029; found: 240.115132; anal. calcd. for C16H16O2 (240.30):
C, 79.97; H, 6.71; N, 0.0; found: C, 80.12; H, 6.78; N, 0.0. The reactions in
Table 1 and Table 2 were performed on a 1 mmol scale using 50 mg
tetradecane as an internal GC standard. The products were isolated by
column chromatography (Al2O3 hexane–ethyl acetate 10:1) and charac-
terized by means of 1H and 13C NMR as well as by GC-MS and HRMS.
1 (a) J. March, Advanced Organic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 3rd
Edition, 1985, 433–435, 824–827; (b) R. C. Larock, Comprehensive
Organic Transformations, VCH, New York, 1989, 685–702; (c) D. A.
Shirley, Organic Reactions, Wiley, New York, 1954, Vol. 8, 28–58; (d)
B. T. O’Neill, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. Trost and I.
Fleming, Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, Vol. 1, 397–458.
Scheme 3 One-pot synthesis of arylketones from carboxylic acids.
Table 2 Pd-catalyzed synthesis of arylketonesa
Comp.
Ar
R
Yield (%)b
2 (a) G. M. Rubottom and C. Kim, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 1550; (b) Y.
Ahn and T. Cohen, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 203; (c) T. Fujisawa, S.
Iida, H. Uehara and T. Sato, Chem. Lett., 1983, 1267.
3 (a) R. K. Dieter, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 4177; (b) M. P. Sibi, Org. Prep.
Proced. Int., 1993, 25, 15; (c) V. Farina, V. Krishnamurthy and W.
Scott, in Organic Reactions, Wiley, New York, 1997, Vol 50, 1–652.
4 (a) M. Haddach and J. R. McCarthy, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 3109;
(b) N. A. Bumagin and D. N. Korolev, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
3057.
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
90
95
90
90
91
56
88
55
51
42
42
2-Phenylethyl
2-Phenylethyl
2-Phenylethyl
2-Phenylethyl
2-Phenylethyl
2-Phenylethyl
2-Phenylethyl
2-Methoxycarbonylethyl
m-Acetoxyphenyl
4-Pyridyl
p-Methoxycarbonylphenyl 53
3-Thienyl
3-Furyl
p-Acetylphenyl
Cyclohexyl
p-Nitrophenyl
p-Methoxyphenyl
p-Cyanophenyl
p-Trifluoromethylphenyl
p-Acetamidophenyl
m-Cyanophenyl
HO-C11H22
o-Tolyl
1-Naphthyl
p-Methoxyphenyl
p-Acetylphenyl
3-Thienyl
2-Furyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
Phenyl
5 (a) L. Liebeskind and J. Srogl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 11260; (b)
P. Zurer, Chem. Eng. News, 2000, 78, 26.
3k
3l
6 (a) M. J. Jorgenson, Organic Reactions, Wiley, New York, 1970, Vol.
18, 1–97; (b) C. R. Iwanow, Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci., 1928, 186, 442;
(c) A. Meisters and T. Mole, Aust. J. Chem., 1974, 27, 1665.
7 L. J. Gooßen and K. Ghosh, Angew. Chem., 2001, 113, 3566.
8 (a) T. Ishiyama, M. Murata and N. Miyaura, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60,
7508; (b) M. Murata, T. Oyama, S. Watanabe and Y. Masuda, J. Org.
Chem., 1997, 62, 6458; (c) M. Murata, T. Oyama, S. Watanabe and Y.
Masuda, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65, 164.
9 M. Bodanszky and A. Bodanszky, The Practice of Peptide Synthesis, ed.
K. Hafner, J.-M. Lehn, C. W. Rees, P.v.R. Schleyer, B. M. Trost, R.
Zahradnik, Springer, Berlin, 1984.
10 C. Amatore and A. Jutand, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 314.
11 Reactions of acylmidazolides with Grignard reagents have however
been reported, some of them being enhanced by addition of Cu(i): (a)
H. A. Staab, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1962, 1, 351; (b) B. F.
Bonini, M. Comes-Franchini, M. Fochi, G. Mozzanti, A. Ricci and G.
Varchi, Synlett, 1998, 9, 1013.
3m
3n
3o
3p
3q
3r
3s
49
48
88
81
37
68
95
89
86
90
78
3t
3u
3v
3w
3x
Phenyl
Phenyl
a Conditions: 1 mmol carboxylic acid, 1.2 mmol boronic acid, 1.3 mmol
DSC, 3 mol% Pd(F6-acac)2, 9 mol% PCy3, 2 mmol Na2CO3, 60 °C, 20 h.
b Isolated yields.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2084–2085
2085