1 J. Cano, P. Royo, M. Lanfranchi, M. A. Pellinghelli and A. Tiripicchio,
Angew. Chem., 2001, 113, 2563–2565 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
40, 2495–2497).
2 J. Jin, D. R. Wilson and E. Y.-X. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2002,
708–709.
3 V. C. Gibson, M. J. Humphries, K. P. Tellmann, D. F. Wass, A. J. P.
White and D. J. Williams, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2252–2253.
4 T. M. Kooistra, Q. Knijnenburg, J. M. M. Smits, A. D. Horton, P. H. M.
Budzelaar and A. W. Gal, Angew., Chem., 2001, 113, 4855–4858
(Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 4719–4722).
5 J. W. Strauch, G. Erker, G. Kehr and R. Fröhlich, Angew., Chem., 2002,
114, 2662–2664 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2543–2546).
6 G. J. P. Britovsek, M. Bruce, V. C. Gibson, B. S. Kimberley, P. J.
Maddox, S. Mastroianni, S. J. McTavish, C. Redshaw, G. A. Solan, S.
Strömberg, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999,
121, 8728–8740.
7 M. A. Esteruelas, A. M. López, L. Méndez, M. Oliván and E. Oñate,
Organometallics, 2003, 22, 395–406 and references cited therein.
8 H. Yasuda, Y. Kajihara, K. Mashima, K. Nagasuna, K. Lee and A.
Nakamura, Organometallics, 1982, 1, 388–396 and references cited
therein.
Fig. 1 Molecular geometry of 8a (the cation is depicted).
9 7a: The reaction of 3a (4.88 g, 7.92 mmol) with 1.94 g (8.75 mmol) of
Bmagnesium-butadieneB in toluene (12 h, 278 °C to room temperature)
gave 0.92 g (56%) of complex 7a after recryst. from toluene at 230 °C.
Anal. calcd. for C33H43N3ClCo (576.1): C 68.80, H 7.52, N 7.29; found:
C 68.50, H 7.53, N 7.19%. Complex 7a was characterized by X-ray
crystal structure analysis (details can be obtained from the authors).7b:
Complex 3b (0.70 g, 0.95 mmol) was treated with methyllithium (1.05
mmol, 0.65 ml of a 1.6 M solution in ether) in toluene (150 ml) for 12
h to yield 0.49 g (73%) of complex 7b after recryst. from toluene at 230
°C. Anal. calcd. for C43H47N3ClCo (700.3): C 73.76, H 6.77, N 6.00;
found: C 73.40, H 6.94, N 5.94%. 1H NMR (d6-benzene, 600 MHz): d
9.53 (t, 1H) and 7.23 (d, 2H, pyr), 7.82 (d, 4H), 7.04 (t, 4H), and 7.32
(t, 2H, o-, m-, p-Ph), 7.46 (t, 2H), 7.25 (d, 4H), 3.66 (sept, 4H), 1.16 (2d,
each 12H, C5H3(CHMe2)2). 13C NMR (d6-benzene, 150 MHz): d 168.1
(C = N), 155.3, 123.8, 117.5 (pyr), 140.0, 123.6, 128.3, 128.0 (ipso-, o-,
m-, p-Ph), 152.0, 140.9, 128.6, 127.1 (ipso-, o-, m-, p-C5H3(CHMe2)2),
29.3 (CHMe2), 24.6 and 23.3 (CH(CH3)2).8a: Complex 7a (100 mg, 396
mmol) was reacted with Li[B(C6F5)4] (308 mg, 450 mmol) in 15 ml of
toluene at room temp. for 1 h. Then dry pyridine (0.03 ml) was added.
Lithium chloride was removed by filtration. Toluene was removed in
vacuo and the deep blue salt 8a dissolved in bromobenzene. Diffusion
of pentane vapor into this solution gave crystals of 8a, which were dried
in vacuo to remove some of the incorporated bromobenzene solvent.
Anal. calcd. for C62H48N4BF20Co (1298.8): C 57.34, H 3.73, N 4.31;
found: C 56.75, H 3.77, N 3.74. X-Ray crystal structure analysis: Crystal
data for [C38H48CoN4]+[B(C6F5)4]2·C6H5Br, M = 1455.79, mono-
clinic, space group P21/c (No. 14), a = 20.027(1), b = 12.241(1), c =
25.895(1) Å, b = 93.75(1)°, V = 6334.6(7) Å3, Dc = 1.526 g cm23, m
= 10.07 cm21, Z = 4, l = 0.71073 Å, T = 198 K, 20215 reflections
the single pyridine ligand is rotated by 64.6° from the average
coordination plane of the Co( ) center. The 2,6-diisopropylphenyl
I
substituents at the imino-nitrogen atoms of the chelate ligand are
both rotated almost perpendicular to the central ligand plane.
Complex 7a (50 mg) was treated with a ca. 5 fold excess of
Li[B(C6F5)4] at ambient temperature in toluene to generate 9. The
mixture was then cooled to 220 °C and purged with ethene (2 bar).
After 1 h the mixture was quenched with methanol. Workup gave
170 mg of linear polyethylene (mp 128 °C), which corresponds to
a catalyst activity of ca. 2 g PE mmol[Co]21 bar (ethene)21. The
analogous polymerization reaction was carried out with the 7b–
Li[B(C6F5)4] system (50 mg/300 mg employed) to yield 350 mg of
polyethylene (a ≈ 5 g PE mmol [Co]21 bar (ethene)21).
The activation of these catalysts was carried out in the absence of
any initial transferable alkyl group. We have neither employed an
alkyl-boron or -aluminium activator (nor their corresponding Lewis
acid components) nor did the transition metal component contain an
abstractable alkyl group as in the previous cases.1–5,10 Never-
theless, the 7–Li[B(C6F5)4] systems were active in ethene polymer-
ization, albeit with rather low catalyst activities. We must,
therefore, conclude that there seem to be additional mechanistic
pathways of transition metal catalyzed olefin polymerization that
follow other than the established pathways of concurrent C–C and
M–C bond formation. Whether metallacyclopentane formation is
involved,3,11 or pathways utilizing more than one metal center or
other mechanistic alternatives may be favoured is an open question
at this time.
collected (±h, ±k, ±l), [(sinq)/l] = 0.59 Å21, 11147 independent (Rint
=
0.063) and 6954 observed reflections [I 4 2s(I)], 866 refined
parameters, R = 0.056, wR2 = 0.114. Spectroscopic characterisation of
9 was attempted, but has remained inconclusive so far due to solubility
problems.
Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
10 B. Temme, G. Erker, J. Karl, H. Luftmann, R. Fröhlich and S. Kotila,
Angew. Chem., 1995, 107, 1867–1869 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1995,
34, 1755–1757). Reviews: G. Erker, Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 34,
309–317; G. Erker, Chem. Commun., 2003, 1469–1476 (feature
article).
Notes and references
crystallographic data in .cif or other electronic format.
11 U. Dorf, K. Engel and G. Erker, Angew. Chem., 1982, 94, 916–919
(Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1982, 21, 914–915).
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 1 8 8 – 1 1 8 9
1189