1936
P. U. Naik et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 1933–1936
9. (a) Hansch, C.; Sammes, P. G.; Taylor, J. B. In Compre-
hensive Medicinal Chemistry; Pergamon: Oxford, 1990;
Vol. 2, Chapter 7.1; (b) Connor, E. E. Sulfonamide
Antibiotics Prim. Care Update Ob./Gyn. 1998, 5, 32; (c)
Hanson, P. R.; Probst, D. A.; Robinson, R. E.; Yau, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4761, and references cited
therein.
with naphthalene (entry 14) resulted in an 88% yield of
product in an a:b ratio of 94:6, (by GC–MS21), which
confirmed the fact that the reaction conditions are
promising for the formation of the kinetically favoured
products over the thermodynamically favoured ones.
Similarly, the reaction of naphthalene with diethyl-
sulfamoyl chloride gave the corresponding sulfonamide
in 87% yield (with a:b ¼ 82:1821). It is noteworthy that,
in terms of the isomer distribution observed for the
naphthyl sulfonamides, the present protocol is distinctly
complementary to the earlier one.17 In the case of
deactivated arenes such as chlorobenzene, no reaction
was observed at room temperature. At higher tempera-
tures however, we obtained a 65% yield of product
within 30 min at 100 ꢁC, which was exclusively para. To
the best of our knowledge, the sulfonamides in entries 4,
6, 8 and 9 of Table 4 are unknown in the literature.
10. Huntress, E. H.; Carten, F. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62,
511.
11. (a) Valkanas, G.; Hopff, H. J. Chem. Soc. 1963, 1923; (b)
Sandler, M.; Burmeister, D. Chem. Ber. 1962, 95, 964; (c)
Carothers, W. H.; Bickford, C. F.; Hurwitz, G. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1927, 49, 2908; (d) Hendrickson, J. B.;
Bergeron, R.; Sternbach, D. D. Tetrahedron 1975, 31,
2517.
12. Becker, H. J. Rec. Trav. Chim. 1915, 70, 254.
13. (a) Kremler, M. M.; Naumenst, D. Khim. Tekhnol. 1970,
163; (b) Terauchi, H.; Yamasaki, A.; Takemura, S. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1975, 23, 3162; (c) Sharpless, K. B.; Chong,
A. O.; Oshima, K. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 177.
14. Bouma, W. J.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. J. Org. Chem. 1976,
41, 143.
15. Arnswald, M.; Neumann, W. P. Chem. Ber. 1991, 124,
1997.
16. Gupta, S. K. Synthesis 1977, 39.
17. Frost, C. G.; Hartley, J. P.; Griffin, D. Synlett 2002, 1928.
18. Benson, G. A.; Maughan, P. J.; Shelly, D. P.; Spillane,
W. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8729.
To conclude, the present protocol serves as an expedi-
tious route to earlier methods, providing almost quan-
titative yields of aromatic sulfonamides under ambient
conditions in most of the cases. In the case of mono-
substituted benzenes, an added advantage is the regio-
selectivity offered by the procedure. The ionic liquid
served a dual purpose of solvent as well as catalyst. The
present method for effecting the sulfamoylation of are-
nes will therefore be a useful addition in the scientific
literature.
19. The conversion in all the cases was monitored on a
reversed-phase HPLC using anisole as an external stan-
dard. The extent of conversion was monitored with respect
to the formation of the product (kmax 224 nm). The HPLC
analysis was performed on a Merck Lachrome, equipped
with the Inertsil ODS3 column (250 mm · 4.6 mm, 5l) and
a UV detector, which was tuned to measure the absor-
bance at 220 nm. The elution was performed with CH3CN/
aqueous buffer, pH 2.5 (0.05 M KH2PO4/H3PO4) taken in
a 65/35 ratio by volume, maintaining a flow rate of
References and notes
1. For reviews on ionic liquids see (a) Welton, T. Chem. Rev.
1999, 99, 2071; (b) Dupont, J.; de Souza, R. F.; Suarez,
P. A. Z. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3667; (c) Zhao, H.;
Malhotra, S. V. Aldrichim. Acta 2002, 35, 75; (d) Sheldon,
R. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2399.
1 mL minꢁ1
.
20. Typical experimental procedure: to the arene (5.5 mmol)
and sulfamoyl chloride (5 mmol) was added [bmim]Clꢀ
AlCl3, 0:50 < N 6 0:67 (5 mmol or as specified in the text)
and the reaction mixture stirred for a specified time at
room temperature. All the additions were performed
under N2 atmosphere in a glove box. The reaction mixture
was quenched by adding 6 M aq HCl solution under cold
conditions. The product was extracted using (3 · 15 mL) of
ethyl acetate. The combined organic extracts were dried
over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The crude reaction mixture was chromatographed using
toluene on a silica gel column to yield the purified product,
which was characterised by melting point IR and 1H
NMR. Spectral data of 1-[(2,3,5,6-tetramethylphenyl)sul-
fonyl]-piperidine (Table 4, entry 4): mp 82–84 ꢁC. IR
(KBr): 2942, 2854, 1636, 1459, 1389, 1299, 1211, 1139,
2. Wasserscheid, P.; Keim, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 3772.
3. (a) Adams, C. J.; Earle, M. J.; Roberts, G.; Seddon, K. R.
Chem. Commun. 1998, 2097; (b) Boon, J. A.; Levisky,
J. A.; Pflug, J. L.; Wilkes, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51,
480; (c) Surette, J. K. D.; Green, L.; Singer, R. D. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1996, 2753; (d) Dyson, D. J.;
Grossle, M. C.; Srinivasan, N.; Vine, T.; Welton, T.;
Williams, D. J.; White, A. J. P.; Zigras, T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1997, 3465; (e) Rebeiro, G. L.; Khadilkar,
B. M. Synthesis 2001, 370.
4. (a) Yeung, K.-S.; Farkas, M. E.; Qiu, Z.; Yang, Z.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5793; (b) Potdar, M. K.;
Mohile, S. S.; Salunkhe, M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
9285.
1
1048, 922, 834, 726, 673, 621, 588, 527 and 487 cmꢁ1. H
5. Mohile, S. S.; Potdar, M. K.; Salunkhe, M. M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1255.
6. Qiao, K.; Deng, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
2191.
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.57 (br s, 6H, 3 ꢂ –CH2–
cyclic), 2.27 (s, 6H, 2 ꢂ –CH3), 2.54 (s, 6H, 2 ꢂ –CH3), 3.15
(br s, 4H, 2 ꢂ –CH2– cyclic) and 7.16 (s, 1H, 1 ꢂ CH
arom.) ppm.
7. (a) Harjani, J. R.; Nara, S. J.; Salunkhe, M. M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1979; (b) Nara, S. J.; Harjani, J. R.;
Salunkhe, M. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8616.
8. Harjani, J. R.; Nara, S. J.; Salunkhe, M. M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 1127.
21. The GC–MS analysis was performed using a Shimadzu,
QP-2010 instrument equipped with a dp-5 column. The
detector temperature was set at 280 ꢁC. The column was
programmed initially at 60 ꢁC for 15 min and then with a
gradient of 10 ꢁC/min to 270 ꢁC.