The role of viscosity on the kinetics of Diels-Alder
reactions was investigated by Firestone and Vitale and
others.6 These authors showed that the intramolecular
Diels-Alder cyclization of N-propargyl-9-anthramide
increases with viscosity of several glymes.6 It is important
to note that they carried out the reaction in tetraglyme,
the viscosity of which is two times higher than that of
glyme itself. These authors noted that the slope of
relative rates versus relative viscosities for the above
intramolecular Diels-Alder reaction was much greater
than the one noted during the kinetic study of Claissen
rearrangement in these solvents. Diels-Alder reactions
share some common features with the Claissen rear-
rangement like low solvent dependence, unrelated to
polarity. The dimerization of cyclopentadiene was also
examined with respect to the viscosities of different
solvents, and a linear increase in the dimerization rate
was seen.7,8 From these examples, it is clear that in the
lower end of the viscosity scale, the increase in the rates
is sharp with viscosity. The reaction rates level off at ∼1.3
cP before dropping with increasing viscosity above ∼1.3
cP. The 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition of diphenyldiazomethane
with ethyl phenylpropiolate was found to be enhanced
with the rise in viscosity of different solvents to about 1
cP. Above 1 cP, a decline in the reaction rates was obser-
ved.7 According to these authors, since pressure increased
viscosities, a part of the pressure-induced rate accelera-
tions of these reactions was due to the enhanced viscosity.
The above examples demonstrate that rates of Diels-
Alder reactions and viscosity are correlated with each
other. However, very recently, questions have been raised
whether viscosity contributes to the rate acceleration in
Diels-Alder reactions.9,10 Firestone and Swiss, on the
other hand, have attempted to establish that the rates
of dimerization of cyclopentadiene in several solvents are
dependent on the viscosities of the solvents.11 Though the
dependence of rates of Diels-Alder reactions on the
solvent viscosity has been supported and criticized,9,10 we
strongly feel that this issue, when supported by experi-
mental data, should receive attention of organic chemists
through a more appropriate vehicle of communication.
In view of the current work from this laboratory in
identifying the origin of forces responsible for rate
enhancement of Diels-Alder reactions in different sol-
vents and their salt solutions,12 we set out to assess the
Exp er im en ta l Evid en ce to Su p p or t
Viscosity Dep en d en ce of Ra tes of
Diels-Ald er Rea ction s in Solven t Med ia
Anil Kumar* and Suvarna S. Deshpande
Physical Chemistry Division,
National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411008, India
akumar@ems.ncl.res.in
Received February 20, 2003
Abstr a ct: This note is aimed at ascertaining whether rates
of Diels-Alder reactions depend on the viscosity of solvent
media in which the reactions are performed. On the basis
of the data collected from the literature and in this labora-
tory, it is seen in general that the rates increase in the
solvents with their viscosities ranging up to ∼1.2 cP. In
solvents possessing viscosities above 1.2 cP, a drop in the
reaction rates is observed in all cases. The effect of temper-
ature on the above phenomena is also examined.
In a recent paper, we addressed the issue of using 5 M
LiClO4-diethyl ether (LPDE) solution in achieving maxi-
mum rate enhancement of several Diels-Alder reac-
tions.1 We demonstrated for the first time a substantial
fall in rates of these reactions when carried out in the
LPDE solutions of concentrations above 5 M. Our results
offered experimental evidence for using 5 M LPDE in the
synthetic work for maximizing rates and yields of Diels-
Alder reactions.2 Originally, the rate enhancement of
Diels-Alder reactions in 5 M LPDE was explained by
Dailey and Forman in terms of the Lewis acid catalysis.3
We attributed the subsequent rate drops in LPDE
solutions of above 5 M to the decreased Lewis acid
catalytic activity of Li+ due to the increased formation
of dietherate and monoetherate complexes.4 As a result
of the complexation, fewer effective “naked” Li+ cations
become available to act as a catalyst, thereby decreasing
the rates to a substantial degree. Second, it was noted
that the rate decrease above 5 M LPDE was also related
to very high viscosity of LPDE solution. No dramatic
increase in the solution viscosity of LPDE was seen up
to a concentration of 5 M. However, the viscosity of nearly
saturated LPDE (≈6.06 M) increased by about 800%, as
compared to that of pure DE.5 Therefore, a highly viscous
environment was considered to play an inhibitive role due
to diffusional problems causing the reaction rates to fall.
(6) (a) Firestone, R. A.; Vitale, M. A. J . Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 2160.
(b) Sternbach, D. D.; Rossana, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 303.
(c) Dumas, T.; Hoekstra, M.; Pentaleri, M.; Liotta, D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1988, 29, 3745. (d) Dolbier, W. R., J r.; Seabury, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1987, 109, 4393. (e) Valgimigli, L.; Ingold, K. U.; Lusztyk, J . J . Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 1, 7947.
(7) Swiss, R. A.; Firestone, R. F. J . Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5369.
(8) Coster, G.; Pfeil, E. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101, 4248.
(1) (a) Kumar, A.; Pawar, S. S. J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7646. (b)
For other possible origins of forces responsible for accelerating Diels-
Alder reactions with original citations, see: Kumar, A. Chem. Rev.
2001, 101, 1.
(2) (a) Grieco, P. A.; Nunes, J . J .; Gaul, M. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 4595. (b) For a recent review on LPDE, see: Sankararaman,
S.; Nesakumar, J . E. Eur. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 2003. (c) Waldmann,
H. In Organic Synthesis Highlights III; Mulzer, J ., Waldmann, H., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998, 205.
(9) le Noble, W. J .; Asano, W. J . Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 3428.
(10) Weber, C. F.; van Eldik, R. J . Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6904.
(11) Firestone, R. A.; Swiss, K. A. J . Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6909.
(12) (a) Kumar, A.; Pawar, S. S. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1745. (b)
Kumar, A.; Pawar, S. S. J . Phys. Org. Chem. 2002, 15, 131. (c) Kumar,
A.; Pawar, S. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8681. (d) Kumar, A.;
Phalgune, U.; Pawar, S. S. J . Phys. Org. Chem. 2001, 14, 577. (e)
Kumar, A.; Phalgune, U.; Pawar, S. S. J . Phys. Org. Chem. 2000, 13,
555. (f) Pawar, S. S.; Phalgune, U.; Kumar, A. J . Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 7055. (g) Kumar, A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70, 615. (h) Kumar,
A. J . Phys. Org. Chem. 1996, 9, 287. (i) Kumar, A. J . Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 4612. (j) Kumar, A. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 230.
(3) Forman, M. A.; Dailey, W. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2761.
(4) Pocker, Y.; Buchholz, R. F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2075
and subsequent papers by Pocker.
(5) Willard, H. H.; Smith, G. F. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1923, 45, 286.
10.1021/jo034221+ CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/04/2003
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5411-5414
5411