Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the C14-C20 Fragment
having the functional groups for the synthesis of both 1 and
2a, was based on the treatment of 5 under acidic conditions.
Ketone 5 may be further dissected in a straightforward
manner to give N,N-dimethylhydrazone 6 and primary alkyl
iodide 7. Of the available options, we speculated that the
desired syn stereocenters at C18 and C19 in 6 might be
established through a boron enolate-mediated aldol reaction
and that the anti stereocenters at C11 and C12 in 7 might
arise from a trans-epoxide opening reaction.6
succinate residue and have a methyl group instead of an
n-butyl group (Figure 1).1,2 By analogy to reveromycins, it
was assumed initially that the absolute configuration of the
spiroketal fragments of spirofungins A and B possessed
11R,12S,15S,18S,19R and 11R,12S,15S,18R,19S configura-
tions, respectively. The stereogenic centers at C4 and C5 in
both 1 and 2 were not determined initially but can be
proposed as having 4S,5S configurations in analogy to the
reveromycins.
Our approach began with an asymmetric aldol addition
of the boron enolate derived from oxazolidinone (R)-8 with
aldehyde 9 to give aldol adduct 10 in 94% yield and >95:5
diastereoselectivity (Scheme 2).7,8 Exchange of the oxazo-
lidinone auxiliary in the syn-aldol 10 with N,O-dimethylhy-
droxylamine9 followed by protection of the alcohol func-
tionality as its TBS ether cleanly provided the Weinreb amide
11, in 86% yield (over two steps). This amide was smoothly
reduced to the aldehyde on treatment with diisobutylalumi-
num hydride at 0 °C (Scheme 2).
The unpurified aldehyde was directly subjected to a
Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons homologation with the re-
quired phosphonate reagent to give the R,â-unsaturated
ketone 12 in 90% isolated yield (E:Z > 95:05) over the two-
step sequence.10 Selective hydrogenation11 of the double bond
proceeded smoothly, leaving the PMB group intact to give
the corresponding methyl ketone, which, after treatment with
N,N-dimethyl hydrazine in the presence of TMSCl as a
dehydrating agent, gave the corresponding hydrazone 13
(18S,19R) in 87% yield for the two-step sequence.12 Starting
from oxazolidinone (S)-8, we were able to prepare hydrazone
In very elegant work, Rizzacasa et al.3 recently proposed
a reassignment of the stereochemistry for spirofungin B with
the proposed corrected structure corresponding to 15-epi-
spirofungin A (structure 2a, 11R,12S,15R,18S,19R), having
a spiroketal with one less anomeric stabilization and not
epimeric at C18 and C19, as suggested earlier (Figure 1).1-3
We also were very intrigued by the fact that the initially
proposed structure for spirofungin B possesses different
absolute configurations at C18 and C19, when compared to
spirofungin A and the reveromycins. As the natural supply
is extremely restricted, and attracted by their promising
anticancer activity, we initiated a project directed toward the
total synthesis of spirofungins A and B.3,4
An efficient and flexible synthesis of their spiroketal parts
is essential to confirm the absolute configurations at C4, C5,
C18, and C19 as well as to provide further material for more
extensive biological studies, along with access to novel
analogues.5
Our disconnection strategy summarized in Scheme 1 (for
spirofungin A) involved cleavage of the C8-C9 as well as
the C20-C21 double bonds to give spiroketal 4.6 The latter
contains five of the seven stereogenic centers of the spiro-
fungins. Our synthetic strategy for the 6,6-spiroketal system,
(6) Numbering of 1, 2, and 2a as well as of each intermediate follows
that suggested in ref 1.
(7) Gage, J. R.; Evans, D. A. Org. Synth. 1990, 68, 83.
(8) (a) Evans, D. A.; Bartroli, J.; Shih, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981,
103, 2127. (b) Evans, D. A.; Taber, T. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 4675.
(9) Levin, J. I.; Turos, E.; Weinreb, S. M. Synth. Commun. 1982, 12, 989.
(10) Maryanoff, B. E.; Reitz, A. B. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 863.
(11) Dias, L. C.; Campano, P. L. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1998, 9, 97.
(12) (a) Evans, D. A.; Bender, S. L.; Morrisy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 2506. (b) Evans, D. A.; Kaldor, S. W.; Jones, T. K.; Clardy, J.; Stout,
T. J. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7001. (c) Panek, J. S.; Jain, N. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2747.
(3) Zanatta, S. D.; White, J. M.; Rizzacasa, M. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1041.
(4) Approaches to the spiroketal parts of spirofungins A and B: (a)
Shimizu, Y.; Kiyota, H.; Oritani, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3141. (b)
Shimizu, T.; Kusaka, J.; Ishiyama, H.; Nakata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 4965.
(5) For a review on spiroketals, see: Vaillancourt, V.; Pratt, N. E.; Perron,
F; Albizati, K. F. In The Total Synthesis of Natural Products; ApSimon, J.,
ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1992; Vol. 8, pp 533-691.
2588
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 15, 2004