R. Irimescu, K. Kato / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 523–525
525
ionic liquid system, Itoh et al.8d used reduced pressure to
remove resulting methanol from the enantioselective
transesterification of 5-phenyl-1-penten-3-ol with methyl
esters and improved the reaction rates and yields. The
reasons for investigating the use of ionic liquids as
reaction media for our system are the following: (1) they
have no detectable vapor pressure and therefore can be
used under reduced pressure, and (2) they are very good
solvents for a wide range of organic compounds. Ionic
liquids have the ability to dissolve compounds with
relatively different polarities (in this work: the substrates
and the resulting amide) so that they can improve the
properties of the reaction mixture and alleviate the dif-
fusional limitations of a very viscous reaction mixture,
as in our case. In an attempt to improve the reaction
performance, two ionic liquids with different properties,
the hydrophobic 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexaflu-
orophosphate ([bmim]PF6) and the hydrophilic 1-ethyl-
3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([emim]BF4),
were tested as reaction media. The initial rate for the
reaction of amine 1 with dodecanoic acid doubled in
[bmim]PF6 (entry 3), but reduced to half in [emim]BF4
(entry 4). The rate was raised more than an order by
performing the reaction of 1 with 4-pentenoic acid in
[bmim]PF6 (entry 6). The enantioselectivity remained
very high for the reactions of 1 in both ionic liquids.
Different results were obtained for the reactions of
amine 2 with 4-pentenoic acid. In both ionic liquids, the
initial reaction rate increased (entries 8 and 9) (with a
more remarkable effect for [bmim]PF6), but the enantio-
selectivity decreased to less than half of the value in non-
solvent system.
ates.10 Better reaction rates were achieved by the use of
ionic liquids as reaction media. We intend to further
improve the performances of the system by expanding
this study to a larger variety of ionic liquids. Finding the
best reaction medium is quite a complicated and tedious
task as its performances depend on the nature of each
substrate and expected product and in many cases, the
most performing reaction medium is very different even
for similar compounds.10 This work is made easier by
the fact that the ionic liquid properties (polarity, vis-
cosity, density, solubility, etc.) can be finely or drasti-
cally modified according to the oneÕs purpose by
changing the anion or the components of the cation.7;8;10
Acknowledgements
A postdoctoral research fellowship from the Japanese
Society for Promotion of Science for Roxana Irimescu is
gratefully acknowledged.
References and Notes
1. Bornscheuer, U. T.; Kazlauskas, R. J. Hydrolases in
Organic Synthesis; Willey-VCH: Weinheim, 1999. pp 103–
106.
2. Montet, D.; Pina, M.; Graille, J.; Renard, G.; Grimaud, J.
Fat. Sci. Technol. 1989, 91, 14–18.
3. Gonzalez-Sabin, J.; Gotor, V.; Rebolledo, F. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2002, 13, 1315–1320.
€
4. Orner, N.; Orrenius, C.; Mattson, A.; Norrin, T.; Hult, K.
To our knowledge, the results presented in this study
demonstrated for the first time the amide synthesis in
non-solvent system by the direct lipase-catalyzed reac-
tion of amines with carboxylic acids and its use for
kinetic resolution of primary amines. This system is the
enzymatic equivalent to the general procedure for amide
synthesis involving the heating of a mixture of amine
and acid at about 200 °C.9 The present enzymatic pro-
cedure offers some important advantages over the
chemical one for the application in industrial processes.
The reaction temperatures are significantly reduced and
as a result its applications can be extended to thermally
labile compounds. In addition, the enantioselectivity of
lipase allows the kinetic resolution of chiral substrates.
In comparison to other lipase-catalyzed systems used to
date, the reaction rates, conversions and enantioselec-
tivities are comparable to the reactions employing other
more expensive acyl donors such as esters or carbon-
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 19, 328–331.
5. Irimescu, R.; Saito, T.; Kato, K. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.
2003, 80, 659–663.
6. Madsen, R.; Roberts, C.; Fraser-Reid, B. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 7920–7926.
7. Welton, T. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071–2083.
8. For some examples of lipase-catalyzed transformations in
ionic solvents, see: (a) Madeira Lau, R.; van Rantwijk, F.;
Seddon, K. R.; Sheldon, R. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4189–
4191; (b) Itoh, T.; Akasaki, E.; Kudo, K.; Shirakami, S.
€
Chem. Lett. 2001, 262–263; (c) Schofer, S. H.; Kaftzik, N.;
Wasserscheid, P.; Kragl, U. Chem. Commun. 2001, 425–
426; (d) Itoh, T.; Akasaki, E.; Nishimura, Y. Chem. Lett.
2002, 154–155.
9. Beckwith, A. L. J. The Chemistry of Amides. In Synthesis
of Amides; Zabicky, J., Ed.; Interscience Publishers:
London, 1970; pp 105–109.
10. van Rantwijk, F.; Hacking, M. A. P. J.; Sheldon, R. A.
Monatsh. Chem. 2000, 131, 549–569.