A. Sharon et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 5815–5818
5817
5. Barabanov, I. I.; Fedenok, L. G.; Polyakov, N. E.;
Shvartsberg, M. S. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Khimi. 2001, 50,
1663–1667.
ꢀ
~
6. Lopez-Alvarado, P.; Alonso, M. A.; Avendano, C.;
Menendez, J. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7971–7974.
7. (a) Warren, J. D.; Lee, V. J.; Angier, R. B. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1979, 16, 1617–1624; (b) Birch, A. J.; Butler, D. N.;
Siddal, J. B. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 2941; (c) Joullie, M. M.;
Duthenpurayil, J. K. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1969, 6, 697–
705; (d) Levy, M. R. W.; Joullie, M. M. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1964, 1, 171–174; (e) Munshi, J. F.; Joullie, M. M.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1967, 4, 133–136.
8. Raudnitz, H. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1929, 62, 509–513.
9. (a) Schofield, K.; Wright, D. E. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 6074–
6076; (b) Krapcho, A. P.; Petry, M. E.; Getahun, Z.;
Landi, J. J., Jr.; Stallman, J.; Polsenberg, J. F.; Gallagher,
C. E.; Maresch, M. J.; Hacker, M. P.; Giuliani, F. C.
J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 828–837.
10. (a) Ram, V. J.; Srivastava, P.; Goel, A. Tetrahedron 2003,
59, 7141–7146; (b) Sharon, A.; Maulik, P. R.; Vithana, C.;
Ohashi, Y.; Ram, V. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 886–893;
(c) Ram, V. J.; Goel, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 93–96;
(d) Saxena, A. S.; Goel, A.; Ram, V. J. Synlett 2002, 1491–
1492.
11. (a) Ram, V. J.; Verma, M.; Hussaini, F. A.; Shoeb, A.
J. Chem. Res. (S) 1991, 98–99; (b) Ram, V. J.; Verma, M.;
Hussaini, F. A.; Shoeb, A. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1991, 1229–
1231.
12. (a) Li, Z.-J.; Yang, Q.; Chen, X.-M.; Huang, Z.-T.
Synthesis 1999, 231–233; (b) Huang, Z.-T.; Liu, Z.-R.
Chem. Ber. 1989, 122, 95–100.
Figure 3. ORTEP diagram of 5a showing the X-ray molecular struc-
ture at the 50% probability level.
3.59 ppm, a methyl singlet at 3.83 ppm, a set of methyl-
ene protons as a multiplet centred at 3.86 ppm, two sets
of ortho coupled doublets at 7.34 and 7.57 ppm and a
broad singlet at 8.49 ppm for the NH proton. The high
field shift of the vinylic proton at 3.59 ppm and its 13C
chemical shift at 72.9 ppm can be attributed to the
shielding effect of the carbonyl and nitrile functional-
ities. The structure of the photocyclized products 5 were
confirmed spectroscopically14 and also through a single
crystal X-ray diffraction analysis for product 5a (Fig.
3).15
The X-ray structure revealed that two rotamers 47.1° (2)
and 77.4° (2) are present in one asymmetric unit.
Rotamers arise due to free rotation along the aryl–aryl
bond.
13. Cuppen, Th. J. H. M.; Laarhoven, W. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1972, 94, 5914–5915.
14. Typical procedure for 4: A mixture of 2H-pyran-2-one 1,
(1 mmol), oxoketene cyclic aminal 2 (1 mmol) and NaH
(60% suspension, 2.5 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL) was
stirred for 2 h at 5–10 °C in the dark. After additional
stirring for another 10 h at 20–25 °C, the reaction mixture
was poured into ice-water and neutralized with 10% HCl.
The separated solid was filtered, washed with water and
dried. The reaction was carried out in the dark to prevent
photocyclization. The crude solid was further purified by
column chromatography using 50% hexane–CHCl3) as
eluent in the dark. Compound 4e: Yield 250 mg (62%); mp:
194–196 °C (dec.); IR (neat): m ¼ 3353, 3019, 2927, 2856,
In summary, our methodology provides a concerted
approach to the synthesis of fused heterocyclic systems
in two-steps using readily available starting materials
under mild conditions. It also opens an efficient syn-
thetic route for the synthesis of complex aza hetero-
cycles.
Acknowledgements
1
2175, 1640, 1597, 1529, 1295, 1216, 1091, 1013 cmꢁ1; H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d ¼ 3:58 (s, 1H, CH), 3.83–3.89
(m, 7H, OCH3 and 2NCH2), 6.32 (s, 1H, CH), 6.95–6.98
(d, J ¼ 8:7 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.32–7.39 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.56–
7.59 (d, J ¼ 8:4 Hz, 2H, ArH), 8.49 (br s, 1H, NH); 13C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d ¼ 42:7, 46.9, 55.4, 72.9, 110.7,
114.3, 122.1, 125.4, 129.6, 138.5, 149.7, 156.8, 160.7, 192.8;
FAB (MS) 404 (Mþþ1). Typical procedure for 5: A
solution of 4 (0.05 mmol) in acetonitrile was irradiated for
10 h with a 200 W electric bulb with stirring. A yellow solid
separated which was filtered and washed with methanol.
The crude product was further purified by column
chromatography using 1% methanol in chloroform as
eluent. Compound 5h: Yield 135 mg (52%); mp: >250 °C;
IR (neat): m ¼ 3330, 2183, 1642, 1593, 1516, 1219 cmꢁ1; 1H
NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3): d ¼ 4:06–4:23 (m, 4H, 2NCH2),
6.84 (s, 1H, CH), 7.28–7.40 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.67–7.71 (m,
2H, ArH), 7.91 (br s, 1H, ArH); FAB (MS) 451 (Mþþ1);
C22H13BrClN3O (450.71) calcd C 58.63, H 2.91, N 9.32;
found C 58.71, H 3.05, N 9.62.
A.S. thanks CSIR, New Delhi, India for a Senior
Research Fellowship. The authors thank SAIF, CDRI,
Lucknow for providing spectroscopic and analytical
data.
References and notes
1. Middleton, R. W.; Parrick, J. In The Chemistry of
Quinonoid Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.;
John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, 1988; Vol. 2, p 1019.
2. (a) Phillips, R. M.; Naylor, M. A.; Jaffar, M.; Daughty, S.
W.; Everett, S. A.; Breen, A. G.; Chodry, G. A.; Stratford,
I. J. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4071–4080; (b) Schulz, W.;
Skibo, E. B. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 629–638; (c) Lee, K.
H. Med. Res. Rev. 1999, 19, 569–596; (d) Skibo, E. B.
Curr. Med. Chem. 1996, 2, 900–931.
3. Reinhert, G.; Hilfiker, R. (Ciba-Geigy, A.-G.; Switz). Ger
Offen (1996), pp 8, Ceden: GWXXBX DE 19613251 A 1#
19961010.
4. Piskunov, A. V.; Shvartsberg, M. S. Mendeleev Commun.
1995, 155–156.
15. Crystal data of 5a: C22H14Cl1N3O1, M ¼ 371:81, ortho-
rhombic, space group Pbca, a ¼ 15:978ð2Þ, b ¼ 17:408ð2Þ,
3
ꢁ
ꢁ
c ¼ 25:366ð2Þ A, V ¼ 7055:4ð13Þ A , T ¼ 293 K, Z ¼ 8,
l ¼ 0:23 mmꢁ1, R1 ¼ 0:0804 for 1644 Fo >4 sig(Fo) and