A R T I C L E S
Sampedro et al.
3. Results and Discussion
correction was applied only to CASSCF optimized geometries
(minima, transition states, and conical intersections). A detailed
comparison between the CASSCF and CASPT2 energy profiles,
absolute and relative energies for 1, 5,5′-diMe-1 and E-2H can
be found in the Supporting Information.
In subsection 3.1, we report the computed photochemical and
thermal reaction paths driving the isomerization of the E- and
Z- forms of 1. To investigate the possibility of prompting
unidirectional rotary motion, in subsection 3.2 we compare the
structure of the energy surface of 1 with that of its chiral
derivative 5,5′-diMe-1. In subsection 3.3, we demonstrate that
the photochemical reaction path of the synthetically accessible
chromophore 2H conforms to that seen for 1. Finally, in
subsection 3.4, we report the synthesis and the experimental
characterization of the derivatives 2, p-MeO-2, and p-NO2-2.
Unless otherwise stated, we shall only discuss CASPT2 energies.
Reaction paths are structural features of the potential energy
surface and do not provide direct information on the molecular
motion. However, since trajectory or quantum dynamics com-
putations on high-quality energy surfaces are presently impos-
sible for molecules of the size considered here, we use reaction
path analysis to discuss their possible dynamical behavior.
3.1 Prototype Switcher Based on a “Locked” Polyenal
Schiff Base (compound 1). In recent computational work,34,35,55
it has been shown that PSBs feature nearly competitive
photochemical Z/E isomerization paths corresponding to rotary
motion about the adjacent double bonds of the chromophore.
The existence of competing paths is clearly undesirable. For
this reason, 1 represents a good prototype for the design of
switchers based on the penta-2,4-dieniminium chromophore. In
fact:
(i) five member rings restrain isomerization about the initial
-CHdNH- and terminal -CHdCH- double bonds of the
structure;
(ii) five member rings are conformationally rigid so that the
possible existence of different conformers of the molecule is
avoided;
(iii) two -(CH2)2- saturated bridges create a scaffold for
functionalization of the switcher and for the introduction of
stereogenic centers (see subsection 3.2).
Notice that property (i) is also satisfied by the diarylene light-
driven molecular rotor13-16 mentioned above. However, these
molecules have “locks” based on cyclohexenylidene rather than
cyclopentenylidene rings and are therefore conformationally less
rigid. This flexibility is, in principle, a source of conformational
intermediates of the “I” type of Scheme 1b and are therefore
undesirable.
In all of the CASSCF and CASPT2 calculations we employed
the 6-31G* basis set except when otherwise stated. The S2 state
of the penta-2,4-dieniminium cation has been found to lie well
above (∼30 kcal mol-1) the lowest S1 state.43 For this reason,
the S2 state is expected not to contribute to the photocycle of 1
and 5,5′-diMe-1 and therefore is not considered. For comparison
with the experimental absorption spectrum the vertical excitation
energies for compound E-2H were computed at the CASPT2
level for the three lowest singlet excited states by averaging
four roots (ground state and three excited states). To assess the
effect of basis set expansion, the CASPT2 calculations at FC
were repeated using the 6-31G** basis set.
The molecular dipole moments and charge distribution
(Mulliken charges) along the backbone of E-2H are determined
at the CASSCF level of theory (see Supporting Information for
details). The structure of all conical intersections have been
optimized applying the methodology included in GAUSSIAN
98.52 The initial relaxation direction (IRD) method53,54 was used
to locate the steepest-descent direction to be follow in the MEP
calculation when starting at FC or CI points.
2.2 Synthesis and Photochemical Studies. The E- and
Z-isomers of 2, p-MeO-2, p-NO2-2 were easily obtained starting
from the corresponding neutral imines. Because the E-sterei-
somers are largely predominant in the synthesized neutral forms
2neut, p-MeO-2neut, p-NO2-2neut, the corresponding Z-
stereoisomers were obtained through irradiation of the E form.
The two isomers could be separated by chromatography. While
reaction of the E- and Z-stereisomers of 2neut, p-MeO-2neut,
and p-NO2-2neut with trifluoroacetic acid yielded the corre-
sponding PSBs, the reaction with methyl trifluoromethane-
sulfonate led quantitatively to the formation of the E- and
Z-forms of 2, p-MeO-2, and p-NO2-2. These methylated
derivatives were found to be more stable and tractable than the
protonated forms. In particular, we observed that the protonated
Z-stereisomers (2H, p-MeO-2H, and p-NO2-2H) tended to
transform thermally to the corresponding E-stereisomers in the
presence of impurities. The higher stability of N-methyl
compounds is qualitatively rationalized by the additional
stabilization of the positive charge at N and by the decreased
mobility of the alkyl group with respect to the proton. Full
synthetic procedures and characterization of new compounds
are reported in the Supporting Information.
While the five-membered ring “locks” of structure 1 are
responsible for the favorable properties i-iii, they also introduce
an angular (Bayer) strain that modifies the values of the N1-
C5-C4 and C1′-C2′-C3′ angles of the penta-2,4-dieniminium
moiety. Similarly, the inductive effects due to alkyl substitution
at the N1, C4, C1′, and C3′ must change the S1 and S0 positive
charge distribution along the chromophore framework. In
principle, these effects may change the favorable properties of
the penta-2,4-dieniminium cation seen in Schemes 2 and 3a.
Thus, to assess whether these properties are still satisfied by 1,
we computed the photoisomerization paths for both the E-1 f
Z-1 and Z-1 f E-1 processes.
(52) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin,
K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi,
R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.;
Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.;
Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz,
J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng,
C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon,
M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.7; Gaussian,
Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
Inspection of Figure 1 indicates that the computed E f Z
and Z f E paths conform to the model energy surface of
Scheme 3a and, thus, display an energy inflection point in
(53) Celani, O.; Robb, M. A.; Garavelli, M.; Bernardi, F.; Olivucci, M. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1995, 243, 1-8.
(54) Garavelli, M.; Celani, P.; Fato, M.; Bearpark, M. J.; Smith, B. R.; Olivucci,
M.; Robb, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 2023-2032.
(55) De Vico, L.; Page, C. S.; Garavelli, M.; Bernardi, F.; Basosi, R.; Olivucci,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4124-4134.
9
9352 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 30, 2004