hydration at this position, creating a mimic of the transition
state for hydrolytic deamination of adenosine (Figure 1).6
Scheme 1a
Figure 1. Hydration of TFMP across the C6-N1 double bond
generates a structure similar to the transition state proposed for the
adenosine deamination reaction catalyzed by ADA.
a (a) FSO2CF2CO2Me, CuI, HMPA, DMF, 70 °C, 91% or CF3I,
Zn, CuI, DMF, 70 °C, 96%; (b) NH3/MeOH, 97%; (c) (i) DMTCl,
pyridine, AgNO3, THF, 98%; (ii) TBDMSCl, TEA, AgNO3, THF,
56%; (iii) â-cyanoethyldiisopropylphosphoramidochloridite, DIPEA,
THF, 80%.
Such a structure, in the appropriate double helical RNA
context, is a good candidate for high-affinity binding at the
ADAR active site. Furthermore, the presence of the tri-
fluoromethyl group creates a sensitive NMR probe of the
electronic environment of this nucleotide in the RNA. 19F
NMR analysis of the binding of 5-fluorodeoxycytidine-
substituted DNA to a cytosine DNA methyltransferase
allowed for delineation of features of its base-flipping
mechanism.7 This approach would be valuable at further
defining the mechanism by which ADARs base flip if the
appropriately fluorine-labeled RNA were available.
6-Trifluoromethylpurine ribonucleoside had been previ-
ously synthesized from a sugar-protected 6-chloropurine
ribonucleoside and trifluoromethyl copper (CF3Cu).8 How-
ever, the reaction time (60 h) and yield (29%) led us to
investigate other methods to obtain this compound. Given
the precedent of increased yields in copper-mediated coupling
reactions with bromides over chlorides, we attempted copper-
mediated trifluoromethylation with tri-O-acetyl-6-bromo-
purine ribonucleoside (1) (Scheme 1).
of manipulation of liquid MFSDA vs the gaseous CF3I makes
the former condition more desirable. To the best of our
knowledge, this constitutes the first reported use of the
MFSDA reagent in nucleoside synthesis. The acetyl protect-
ing groups on ribose were removed in MeOH saturated with
NH3 to give TFMP (3) in greater than 80% yield in two steps
from 1. Recently, two alternative strategies for obtaining 3
were reported.12,13 Although the trifluoromethylation step in
each route is high yielding, the overall yield reported for
each procedure is lower than that reported here.
Synthesis of a monomer useful for automated RNA
synthesis proceeded initially by protection of the 5′-hydroxyl
as the dimethoxytrityl (DMT) ether. Using the conditions
of Ogilvie, the 2′-hydroxyl was silylated regioselectively with
tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride and AgNO3.14 Finally, the
3′-phosphoramidite (4) was generated via reaction of 2-cyano-
ethyl diisopropylphosphoramidochlorodite in the presence of
Hu¨nig’s base. Using this phosphoramidite and standard
automated RNA synthesis procedures, TFMP was incorporated
into RNA. On-line trityl monitoring during automated RNA
synthesis indicated quantitative coupling of the phosphor-
amidite (4).
Bromopurine derivative 1 is readily available from inosine
via our recently reported procedure.9 Two different tri-
fluoromethylation reactions with 1 were investigated. Both
FSO2CF2CO2Me (MFSDA)/CuI/HMPA/DMF10 (91%) and
CF3I/Zn/CuI/DMF11 (96%) lead to a high yield of 6-tri-
fluoromethylpurine ribonucleoside (2). However, the ease
The RNA was deprotected in a standard two-step sequence
using NH4OH/EtOH followed by TEA‚3HF. After depro-
tection and purification of the oligonucleotides, ESI and
MALDI mass spectrometric analysis confirmed that the TFM
P
(6) Erion, M. D.; Reddy, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3295-
3304.
(7) Klimasauskas, S.; Szyperski, T.; Serva, S.; Wu¨thrich, K. EMBO J.
1998, 17, 317-324.
nucleotide was incorporated into the RNA unaltered (Figure
2).
(8) Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Asai, T.; Nakano, M.; Kumadaki, I.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 2755-2761.
(9) Ve´liz, E. A.; Beal, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1695-97.
(10) Qing, F.-L.; Fan, J.; Sun, H.-B.; Yue, X.-J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1997, 3053-3058.
(11) Prasad, A. S.; Stevenson, T. M.; Citineni, J. R.; Nyzam, V.; Knochel,
P. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 7237-7254.
(12) Hockova´, D.; Hocek, M.; Dvora´kova´, H.; Votruba, I. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 11109-11118.
(13) Hocek, M.; Holy, A. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1999, 64,
229-241.
(14) Hakimelahi, G. H.; Proba, Z. A.; Ogilvie, K. K. Can. J. Chem. 1982,
60, 1106-1113.
2970
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 19, 2001