For the generation of alkyl radicals, triethylborane-air
initiation has been a popular tin-free method.7 Ethyl radical,
generated from triethylborane, abstracts iodine from alkyl
iodides8 or hydrogen from solvent ethers9 to give carbon-
centered radicals. However, the scope of this method is
limited to the generation of secondary, tertiary, and stabilized
alkyl radicals. Production of primary alkyl radicals by the
triethylborane method is inefficient because ethyl radical is
as stable as other primary alkyl radicals. The most common
solution to this problem is the use of a stoichiometric amount
of tributyltin hydride as a source of a tin radical that
efficiently abstracts halogen.10 Because a methyl radical is
less stable than primary alkyl radicals (bond dissociation
energy in kJ/mol; Me-H ) 439 vs Et-H ) 421),11 we
expected that a methyl radical, generated from dimethylzinc,
should be able to abstract an iodine atom from a primary
alkyl iodide to give a primary alkyl radical.
First, the reaction of imine 1a and hexyl iodide was carried
out by using a large excess amount of the iodide and
dimethylzinc, without solvent. The expected generation of
hexyl radical seemed to take place, giving hexyl adduct 2 in
40% yield after 110 h (Table 1, entry 1). In the presence of
6 equiv of boron trifluoride-diethyl etherate,4d the reaction
was accelerated to give 2 in 62% yield after 10 h with 5
equiv of the iodide, 6 equiv of dimethylzinc, and dichlo-
romethane as solvent (entry 2).
To our delight, the reaction was further accelerated with
0.1 equiv of copper(I) iodide12 to give 2 in 64% yield after
6 h (entry 3). Other copper salts were also tested. The results
with copper(I) halides (entries 3-5) were less satisfactory
than those with other copper(I) and copper(II) salts (entries
6-10). Copper(II) triflate gave the best results to afford 2
in 71% yield after 1.5 h (entry 10). Without boron trifluo-
ride-diethyl etherate, the reaction was rather slower, giving
2 in 45% yield even after 24 h (entry 11). [1,1′-Bis-
(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium also ac-
celerated the reaction, but less efficiently, to give 2 in 57%
yield after 4 h (entry 14). Interestingly, when nickel(II)
acetylacetonate was used as an additive, the addition of a
methyl group took place very quickly to give methyl adduct
in 97% yield after 0.5 h (entry 15). Finally, it was found
that the reaction with copper(II) triflate was as efficient when
cooled in an ice-water bath to give 2 in 74% yield after 1.5
h (entry 12). Under argon atmosphere, the reaction was
dramatically retarded (entry 13). These results suggest that
the initiation of a radical process by dimethylzinc and air
oxygen is required for the reaction.
Table 1. The Addition of Hexyl to Imine 1a Initiated by
Me2Zn-Aira
Me2Zn n-C6H13
I
time yield
entry (equiv) (equiv)
additives (equiv)
none
BF3‚OEt2 (6)
BF3‚OEt2 (6)
CuI (0.1)
temp
(h)
(%)
1b
2
3
9
6
6
60
5
5
rt
rt
rt
110
10
6
40
62
64
4
5
6
7
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
BF3‚OEt2 (4)
CuBr (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (4)
CuCl (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (4)
CuCN (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (4)
Cu(ClO4)(MeCN)4
(0.1)
rt
rt
rt
rt
3
3
3
3
53
47
65
64
8
9
4
4
2
5
5
5
BF3‚OEt2 (4)
(CuOTf)2‚C6H6 (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (4)
CuCl2 (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (2)
Cu(OTf)2 (0.1)
Cu(OTf)2 (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (2)
Cu(OTf)2 (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (2)
Cu(OTf)2 (0.1)
BF3‚OEt2 (2)
PdCl2(dppf)‚CHCl3
(0.1)
rt
rt
rt
3
3
63
63
10
1.5 71
11
12
2
2
5
5
rt
0 °C
24
1.5 74
45
13c
14
2
2
5
5
0 °C
rt
1.5
5
4
57
15
2
5
BF3‚OEt2 (2)
Ni(acac)2 (0.1)
rt
0.5
0d
a The reaction was conducted under ordinary air atmosphere with a CaCl2
drying tube unless otherwise mentioned. b Without solvent CH2Cl2. c Under
argon atmosphere. d Methyl adduct was obtained in 97% yield.
Other radical initiators, diethylzinc13 and triethylborane,14
were tested with regard to their reaction efficiency. The
reactions were conducted under the same conditions as in
Table 1, entry 12. Diethylzinc or triethylborane, in place of
dimethylzinc, gave ethyl adduct 3 as the major product in
82% and 32% yield, respectively (Scheme 1). Adduct 2 was
Scheme 1. The Reaction of 1a and n-C6H13I Initiated by Et2Zn
or Et3B in the Presence of BF3‚OEt2 and Cu(OTf)2
(7) Ollivier, C.; Renaud, P. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3415-3434.
(8) (a) Nozaki, K.; Oshima, K.; Uchimoto, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988,
29, 1041-1044. (b) Suzuki, A.; Nozawa, S.; Harada, M.; Itoh, M.; Brown,
H. C.; Midland, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1508-1509.
(9) (a) Yoshimitsu, T.; Arano, Y.; Nagaoka, H. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
2342-2345. (b) Yoshimitsu, T.; Makino, T.; Nagaoka, H. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 7548-7550. (c) Yoshimitsu, T.; Arano, Y.; Nagaoka, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 625-627. (d) Yoshimitsu, T.; Tsunoda, M.; Nagaoka, H.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 1745-1746.
(10) Unfortunately, the tin method sometimes fails: Friestad, G. K.;
Draghici, C.; Soukri, M.; Qin, J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6330-6338.
(11) Luo, Y.-R. Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic
Compounds; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003; p 11.
the minor product as expected.15
Other primary alkyl iodides were also applicable to the
reaction. Butyl adduct 4a was obtained in 80% yield (Table
2, entry 1). The addition of 4-acetoxybutyl proceeded without
(13) Bertrand, M. P.; Coantic, S.; Feray, L.; Nouguier, R.; Perfetti, P.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 3951-3961.
(14) Miyabe, H.; Ueda, M.; Naito, T. Synlett 2004, 1140-1157.
(12) (a) Knochel, P. Synlett 1995, 393-403. (b) Knochel, P.; Singer, R.
D. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 2117-2188.
88
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006