Scheme 4 Epoxidation of geranylammonium tosylate 5 with m-CPBA and Oxone.
in keeping with our mechanism in which a protonated amine
activates by hydrogen bonding the peroxymonosulfate anion (it is
now a better electrophile) towards nucleophilic attack by the
alkene.
We then tested a more challenging substrate, geranylammonium
tosylate 5.9 This substrate has two alkenes: a remote trisubstituted,
electron rich alkene, and an alkene that is strongly deactivated
by the ammonium cation. We questioned whether the directing/
activating effects of the protonated ammonium ion with
Oxone could overcome the inherent reduced nucleophilicity of
the alkene, and so control the regiochemistry of epoxidation
(Fig. 1).
We tested both m-CPBA10 and Oxone in the epoxidation
process. Epoxidation of the geranylammonium salt with m-CPBA
gave a mixture of monoepoxides 6 and 7, diepoxide 8, and starting
material. This indicates that the directing effect of the ammonium
cation, which promotes epoxidation of the proximal alkene, was
effectively cancelled out by the deactivation caused by the strong
electron withdrawing group, resulting in similar rates of epoxida-
tion for the two alkenes (Scheme 4). In contrast using Oxone, a
much cleaner reaction was observed, and the only monoepoxida-
tion product isolated was the epoxyamine 6. This clearly
demonstrates that the protonated ammonium ion both
activated and directed Oxone epoxidation to take place at the
alkene proximal to it. The degree of activation of the oxidant
by the ammonium ion (relative to the power of the free
oxidant) is clearly greater for Oxone than m-CPBA as it
completely outweighed the reduced nucleophilicity of the alkene
(Scheme 4).
Scheme 5 Synthesis of ammonium salts
¯
conditions: (i) MeLi/CeCl3, THF, 278 oˆC to r.t. 78%; (ii) KH, Et2O,
¯
NCCCl3, 25 oˆC to r.t, 83%; (iii) 6 N NaOH, EtOH, 81%; (iv)
1
and 4. Reagents and
HCHO, NaBH3CN, 95%; (v) MeI/Et2O, 98%; (vi) TsOH, THF, 89%;
(vii) AgBF4/H2O, 89%.
Notes and references
{ Crystal data for compound 3: C14H19NO3S, M 5 281.1, triclinic, space
¯
group P1,
a
5 7.1014(6), b 5 8.6018(7),
c
5
12.6772(11) s,
a
5
101.5860(10),
b
5
98.6520(10),
c
5
109.5870(10)u, V 5
694.53(10) s3, Z 5 2, T 5 173(2), Dc 5 1.345 Mg m23, crystal dimensions
0.25 6 0.10 6 0.10 mm, Mo-Ka radiation, l 5 0.71073 s. Data were
collected on a Bruker Smart CCD area-detector diffractometer and a total
of 3146 of the 7277 reflections were unique (Rint 5 0.0247). Refinement on
F2, wR2 5 0.1051 (observed reflections), R1 5 0.0496 [I . 2s(I)]. CCDC
graphic data in CIF or other electronic format.
Oxone and m-CPBA show similarly high levels of diastereos-
electivity in the epoxidation of cyclic, allylic ammonium salts. As
Oxone is the safer and less hazardous reagent of the two, especially
on a large scale, we would expect it to be the reagent of choice for
such substrates. In reactions of allylic ammonium salts
containing multiple double bonds it is far superior, delivering
high levels of regiocontrol due to its strong activation by hydrogen
bonding.
1 M. F. A. Adamo, V. K. Aggarwal and M. A. Sage, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2000, 122, 8317; M. F. A. Adamo, V. K. Aggarwal and M. A. Sage,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 11223.
2 V. K. Aggarwal, C. Lopin and F. Sandrinelli, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,
125, 7596.
3 A. Armstrong, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 1460; C.-Y. Ho,
Y.-C. Chen, M.-K. Wong and D. Yang, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70,
898.
4 (a) G. Asensio, R. Mello, C. Boix-Bernardini, M. E. Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez
and G. Castellano, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 3692; (b) G. Asensio,
R. Mello, C. Boix-Bernardini, C. Andreu, M. E. Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez,
R. Mello, J. O. Edwards and G. B. Carpenter, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64,
4705.
This work reinforces the proposed mechanism of the ammo-
nium salts in that they not only act as directing groups, but also as
activators of Oxone by hydrogen bonding. In addition, the work
fills a methodology gap by providing a method for controlling the
regiochemistry of epoxidation in allylic amines.
5 A. S. Edward, R. A. J. Wybrow, C. Johnstone, H. Adams and J. P.
R. Harrity, Chem. Commun., 2002, 1542.
We thank the EPSRC for their support of this work and
Chrystel Lopin for developing the synthesis of 1.
6 For a review of substrate directable reactions see: A. H. Hoveyda,
D. A. Evans and G. C. Fu, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 1307. For a recent
example of diastereoselective, amide-directed epoxidation see: P. O’Brien,
A. C. Childs, G. J. Ensor, C. L. Hill, J. P. Kirby, M. J. Dearden,
S. J. Oxenford and C. M. Rosser, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 4955 and
references therein. For examples of ketone directed epoxidation see:
Varinder K. Aggarwal* and Guang Yu Fang
Department of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock’s Close,
Bristol, UK BS8 1TS. E-mail: V.Aggarwal@bristol.ac.uk;
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 8611; Tel: +44 (0)117 9546319
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2005
Chem. Commun., 2005, 3448–3450 | 3449