Scheme 2. Diastereoselective Anodic spiro-Cyclization of
Chiral Primary and Secondary Alcoholic Phenyl Alkyl
Ethers 3 and 4 into the Four Possible Orthoquinone
Bisketal Enantiomers 5
Scheme 3. Proposed Transition State Models for the
Rationalization of the Diastereoselectivity Observed in the
Anodic spiro-Cyclization of Chiral Primary and Secondary
Alcoholic Phenyl Alkyl Ethers 3 and 4 into Orthoquinone
Bisketal Enantiomers 5
asymmetric preparation of orthoquinone monoketals has been
described in the benzoid series.5 As Pettus recently wrote,1b
the development of such methods is a worthy goal in organic
chemistry considering the potential of these entities for
enantioselective synthesis. Herein we report for the first time
a promising and environmentally benign approach to this
challenge.
Our interest in the oxidative dearomatization of 2-alkoxy-
phenols into such cyclohexa-2,4-dienone derivatives led us
to envisage asymmetric versions of the reactions we are
investigating.6 We found inspiration in the work done on
cyclohexa-2,5-dienones equipped with chiral cyclic ketal
moieties.7,8 These compounds are usually generated via mild
acid-mediated transketalization reactions by heating together
paraquinone dimethyl monoketals and enantiopure diols.7
These conditions are not suitable for the targeted cyclohexa-
2,4-dienones, which are sensitive to both acids and heat. In
this study, we instead relied on anodic oxidation to generate
orthoquinone bisketals from phenyl methyl ethers bearing a
chiral ethanol unit O-tethered to the phenyl ring next to the
methyl ether group (Scheme 2). The two enantiomers of both
phenyl methyl ethers 3 and 4 were generated by a William-
son-type reaction between 5-bromoguaiacol (1) and (S)-2-
chloro-1-phenylethanol (2) or its enantiomer (R)-2 (see
Supporting Information for details on these preparations).
The chirality of their ethanol unit was thus anticipated to
induce asymmetry at the aromatic carbon center undergoing
the sp2 f sp3 geometry change during anodic spiro-
cyclization (Schemes 2 and 3). The 5-bromo substituent on
guaiacol is needed to hinder dimerization of the product
(Scheme 4).4a All four enantiopure alcohols were then
individually electrolyzed, under the conditions developed by
Dolson and Swenton,9 to furnish the desired bisketals 5
(Scheme 2).
This anodic spiro-cyclization afforded the bisketals in only
low yields when starting from the secondary alcohols (R)-
and (S)-4, whereas the less encumbered primary alcohols (R)-
and (S)-3 were both converted into the desired products in
ca. 30% yield. Off course, these isolated yields still deserve
to be further optimized to expand the preparative value of
this methodology, but the fact that, in each of the four cases,
a different stereoisomer was isolated as the sole spiro-ketal
product shows the remarkable potential of this unprecedented
anodic oxidation approach to chiral orthoquinone ketals. The
configuration at the newly generated spiro-centers was
determined via two-dimensional NOE spectroscopy (Scheme
2). Thus, (R)-3 led to the bisketal (RS)-5 as indicated by the
observation of two NOE correlations between each of the
two spiro-ketal protons H1′ and H3′ and the aromatic proton
H5. A similar couple of correlations were observed for (SR)-5
that was generated from the primary alcohol (S)-3. In the
case of the other enantiomeric pair of bisketals (RR)- and
(3) Quideau, S.; Looney, M. A.; Pouyse´gu, L.; Ham, S.; Birney, D. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 615-618.
(4) (a) Lai, C.-H.; Shen, Y.-L.; Wang, M.-N.; Rao, K.; Liao, C.-C. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6493-6502. (b) Andersson, G. Acta Chem. Scand.
1976, B 30, 403-406.
(5) For an example of chiral naphthoid orthoquinone monoketals, see:
(a) Fujioka, H.; Annoura, H.; Murano, K.; Kita, Y.; Tamura, Y. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1989, 37, 2047-2052.
(6) (a) Deffieux, D.; Fabre, I.; Courseille, C.; Quideau, S. J. Org. Chem
2002, 67, 4458-4465. (b) Pouyse´gu, L.; Avellan, A.-V.; Quideau, S. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3425-3436.
(7) (a) Corey, E. J.; Wu, L. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9327-
9328. (b) de March, P. ; Escoda, M.; Figueredo, M.; Font, J.; Alvarez-
Larena, A.; Piniella, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3895-3897. (c) Hu, Y.;
Li, C.; Kulkarni, B. A.; Strobel, G.; Lobkovsky, E.; Torczynski, R. M.;
Porco, J. A., Jr. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1649-1652. For another approach, see:
(d) Wipf, P.; Jung, J.-K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 37, 7764-767.
(8) For a related example of an enantioselective access to paraquinols,
see: Mejorado, L. H.; Hoarau, C.; Pettus, T. R. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1535-
1538.
(9) Dolson, M. G.; Swenton, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 177-179.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004
4572