when using palladium on charcoal catalyst.9 However, the
simple expedient of Pearlman’s catalyst10 [Pd(OH)2] led to
facile hydrogenolysis of the O-benzyl moieties in excellent
yield (92%), although the N-benzyl group of the imide moiety
did not hydrogenolyze (Scheme 1). N-Benzyl imides are a
the hydrogenolysis of benzyl-protected moieties is unknown,
data in the literature supports that ester groups undergo
hydrogenolysis with greater facility than ether groups.14
Therefore, we reasoned that the hydroxyl groups of nucleo-
sides functionalized as benzyloxycarbamates (Cbz) may be
more labile toward hydrogenolysis than their benzyl ether
counterparts. Indeed, hydrogenolysis of Cbz-protected uridine
5 was complete in less than 90 min using palladium on
carbon catalyst in ethanol. Given that palladium on charcoal
catalysts promoted the reduction of the nucleobase for the
benzylidene-protected uridine, we carefully examined the
products from the hydrogenolysis of Cbz-protected uridine
5 using NMR spectroscopy. We observed evidence consistent
with minor reduction (0.2%) of the nucleobase (Scheme 3).
Scheme 1. Pearlman’s Catalyst Is More Effective for
Hydrogenolysis of Nucleoside O-Bn Groups than Pd/C
particularly difficult functionality to hydrogenolyze,4,11 and
previous reports12,13 attest to the difficulty associated with
the hydrogenolysis of N-benzyl pyrimidine nucleosides. Thus,
the per-benzyl-protected nucleoside (1) was deemed to be
incompatible with our future plans.
Scheme 3. Minor Reduction (0.2%) of the Nucleobase Can
Occur with Pyrimidine Nucleosides
The benzylidene moiety has been used with purine
nucleosides as a diol protecting group that is labile to
hydrogenolysis. Therefore, we explored whether the ben-
zylidene acetal of a pyrimidine nucleoside (i.e., uridine 3)
is also labile to hydrogenolysis. Deprotection of the ben-
zylidene-protected pyrimidine requires 2 days to reach
complete reaction. Upon isolating the product (4), we find
that reduction of the nucleobase C5-C6 alkene occurs
(Scheme 2).
The separation of uridine 6 from its reduced side-product 4
is nontrivial. Therefore, we explored other conditions to
affect hydrogenolysis of the Cbz moieties that would avoid
even this small amount of reduction of the nucleobase. To
that end, transfer hydrogenolysis has been reported by
Rapoport et al.15 as a method to avoid reduction of the
pyrimidine C5-C6 alkene.
Scheme 2. Reduction of the Nucleobase-alkene Occurs during
Prolonged Hydrogenolysis
Transfer hydrogenolysis of Cbz-protected uridine 5 (Scheme
4) gives no appreciable reduction of the nucleobase in the
Scheme 4. Transfer Hydrogenolysis Avoids Minor Reduction
of Pyrimidine Nucleobase
The long reaction times and concomitant reduction of the
nucleobase, as well as the resistance of the N-benzyl imide
toward hydrogenolysis, prompted us to investigate alternate
means to use hydrogenolysis for deblocking pyrimidine-
containing nucleosides. Although a detailed mechanism for
product (6), within the limits detectable by NMR spectros-
copy (see Supporting Information for spectra).
(9) A variety of reaction conditions were explored using 10% Pd/C
catalyst (1 mg of catalyst/5 mg of nucleoside). Solvents (EtOH, EtOAc,
THF), additives (AcOH/ heat), and reaction times (up to 48 h) were also
investigated but were not observed to promote hydrogenolysis.
(10) Pearlman, W. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 17, 1663-1664.
(11) Johnson, D. C., II; Widlanski, T. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45 (46),
8483-8487.
The Cbz-protecting group is easily installed in high yield
for various pyrimidines and purine nucleosides using ben-
zylchloroformate (1.5 equiv/OH group) and DMAP (2 equiv/
OH group) in dichloromethane. Under these conditions, the
(12) Luzzio, F. A.; Menes, M. E. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59 (24), 7167-
7272.
(14) Kieboom, A. P. G.; De Kreuk, J. F.; Van Bekkum, H. J. Catal.
1971, 20, 58-66.
(15) Watkins, B. E.; Kiely, J. S.; Rapoport, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104 (21), 5702-5708.
(13) Bar, N. C.; Patra, R.; Achari, B.; Mandal, S. B. Tetrahedron 1997,
53 (13), 4727-4738.
4644
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 25, 2004