Med Chem Res
the alkyl chain length negatively affected antibacterial
activity (R = H > Me > Et, 4a–4c) (Table 2). Substitution
with a phenyl ring (4d) improved activity, but similar to
alkyl derivatives, increasing the alkyl linker between the N
atom and phenyl ring (derivatives 4e–4f) generally
decreases antibacterial activity. The presence of an unsa-
turated phenyl ring was essential as saturation of the ring to
the cyclohexyl derivative (4g) significantly impacted on
activity, particularly against E. coli. Given that compound
4d was the most effective compound against S. aureus, we
then designed and synthesised derivatives 4i–l in order to
investigate the effect of ring substitutions on antibacterial
activity. Although none of the synthesised analogues were
more potent than 4d, it was interesting to note that electron-
withdrawing substituents reduced antibacterial activity
against both E. coli and S. aureus. In particular, the activ-
ities of derivatives 4i (R = 3-Cl-Ph) and 4j (R = 4-Cl-Ph)
were very similar, indicating the requirement for the phenyl
ring to be electron-rich. Derivative 4l (R = 4-tBu-Ph) was
inactive against both E. coli and S. aureus, most likely due
to steric reasons. Overall, 4b was the best derivative iden-
tified in the series, with an MIC of 80 µg mL−1 and an MBC
of 150 µg mL−1 against E. coli and an MIC of 300 µg mL−1
and an MBC of 600 µg mL−1 against S. aureus.
Conclusions
A novel synthesis of 1 is proposed based on the dimerisa-
tion of 2. A number of (E)-enaminopyran-2,4-diones based
on the structure of 1 were prepared and evaluated for
antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-
negative bacteria and demonstrate broad-spectrum activ-
ities. We identified 4b (R = Me) and 4d (R = Ph) as
improved antibacterial agents that inhibited and prevented
the growth of both E. coli and S. aureus to a greater extent
than 1. Derivative 4b significantly inhibited the growth of
E. coli compared to S. aureus while derivative 4d had
greater potency against S. aureus than E. coli. Further
research is necessary to investigate their proposed
mechanism of action as antagonists of bacterial commu-
nication as a potential avenue for antimicrobial drug
development. Given the rise in antibiotic resistance, anti-
bacterial agents based on the lead compounds 4b/4d may be
of use in the search for broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Acknowledgements We thank the Division of Pharmacy and
Optometry, The University of Manchester and the Presidential Doc-
toral Scholar award for providing funding to AGB.
Compliance with ethical standards
The ability of compounds 4b and 4d to inhibit and
prevent the growth of both Gram-positive and Gram-
negative bacteria at much lower concentrations than the lead
compound 1 is promising. This cross-species antibacterial
effect suggests a mode of action common among bacteria
essential for its survival and growth. α-Pyrones have
recently been identified as important endogenous signalling
molecules in bacterial cell–cell communication (Brachmann
et al. 2013) and it has been suggested that α-pyrones could
have antagonist effects by disrupting quorum-like signalling
in pyrone-producing bacteria, similar to the antimicrobial
effects of synthetic analogues of N-acyl homoserine lactone
(AHL) autoinducers on quorum sensing (Swem et al. 2009).
The results of this study support the notion that some α-
pyrone derivatives exhibit antibacterial properties and that
the potential mechanism of action of pyrone derivatives 4b
and 4d may involve interference with cell–cell bacterial
communication. It is interesting to note that the α-pyrone
signalling molecules described by Brachmann et al. had
long fatty acid side chains and future analogues of 4 with
these R groups may enhance their antibacterial activity.
There are also reports that derivatives of 1 bind to and
cleave DNA (Chitrapriya et al. 2008) and are suggested to
target the essential bacterial enzyme DNA gyrase (Pal et al.
2014). Chemoproteomic studies using 4h (R = propargyl)
as a reagent for the ‘Click-chemistry’ method could be
undertaken to elucidate the mechanism of action of these α-
pyrone derivatives and potentially give rise to a new class of
antibacterial agents.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no competing
interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://crea
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a
link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were
made.
References
Arndt F, Hartman WW, Weissberger A (1940) Dehydroacetic acid.
Org Synth 20:26
Baldwin AG, Rivers-Auty J, Daniels MJD, White CS, Schwalbe CH,
Schilling T, Hammadi H, Jaiyong P, Spencer NG, England H,
Luheshi NM, Kadirvel M, Lawrence CB, Rothwell NJ, Harte
MK, Bryce RA, Allan SM, Eder C, Freeman S, Brough D (2017)
Boron-based inhibitors of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Cell Chem
Blair JM, Webber MA, Baylay AJ, Ogbolu DO, Piddock LJ (2015)
Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Micro-
biol 13:42–51
Brachmann AO, Brameyer S, Kresovic D, Hitkova I, Kopp Y, Manske
C, Schubert K, Bode HB, Heermann R (2013) Pyrones as bac-
terial signaling molecules. Nat Chem Biol 9:573–578
Chitrapriya N, Mahalingam V, Zeller M, Jayabalan R, Swaminathan
K, Natarajan K (2008) Synthesis, crystal structure and biological
activities of dehydroacetic acid complexes of Ru(II) and Ru(III)
containing PPh3/AsPh3. Polyhedron 27:939–946