9368
K. Miyata et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 9365–9368
Table 4. Fluorescence intensitya of 2-aminopurine (ap) in DNA 13mer
duplexes containing dCncm
Acknowledgements
I: 50-d(AGAGAAapGAGAAA)-30,
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scien-
tific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. This work was
also supported by CREST of JST (Japan Science and
Technology) and partially supported by the COE21
project.
II: 50-d(TTTCTCCTTCTCT)-30,
III: 50-d(TTTCTCCncmTTCTCT)-30
Entry
Oligo
Fluorescence intensity
1
2
3
Only I
I–II
I–III
62
15
13
a Recorded with an exicitation wavelength of 310nm and an emission
wavelength at 370nm.
References and notes
1. Wada, T.; Kobori, A.; Kawahara, S.; Sekine, M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6907–6910.
DNA duplexes containing a Cncm–apmismatch base
pair was actually quenched as shown in Table 4 (entries
1–3). These results suggest that the mismatched base
moiety opposite to 4-N-[N-(napht-1-yl)carbamoyl]-dC
is not flipped out but is involved in stacking of the
DNA duplex. However, owing to the steric hindrance
of the N-(napht-1-yl)carbamoyl group, the modified
and complementary base moieties are expected to stack
with each other in the DNA duplex.
2. Wada, T.; Kobori, A.; Kawahara, S.; Sekine, M. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 4583–4593.
3. Kobori, A.; Miyata, K.; Ushioda, M.; Seio, K.; Sekine, M.
J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 476–485.
4. Miyata, K.; Kobori, A.; Seio, K.; Sekine, M., J. Org.
Chem., unpublished work.
5. Tamura, N.; Aoki, K.; Lee, M. S. Carcinogenesis 1990, 11,
2009–2014.
6. Nakano, S.; Uotani, Y.; Nakashıma, S.; Anno, Y.; Fujii,
M.; Sugimoto, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8086–
8087.
7. Current Protocols in Nucleic Acid Chemistry; Beaucage, S.
L., Bergstrom, D. E., Glick, G. D., Jones, R. A., Eds.;
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 2000.
8. Sinha, N. D.; Biernat, J.; Koster, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1983, 24, 5843–5846.
9. Stivers, J. T.; Pankiewicz, K. W.; Watanabe, K. A.
Biochemistry 1999, 38, 952–963.
10. Beuck, C.; Singh, I.; Bhattacharya, A.; Hecker, W.;
Parmar, V. S.; Seitz, O.; Weinhold, E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3958–3960.
11. Nichols, R.; Andrews, P. C.; Zhang, P.; Bergstrom, D. E.
Nature 1994, 369, 492–493.
12. Loakes, D.; Brown, D. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22,
4039–4043.
13. Matray, T. J.; Kool, E. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
6191–6192.
14. Raunak; Babu, B. R.; Sorensen, M. D.; Parmar, V. S.;
Harrit, N. H.; Wengel, J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 80–
89.
The conventional universal bases would be classified
into two groups. Most artificial universal bases such as
3-nitropyrrole11 and 5-nitroindole12 do not stack with
the opposite base moiety. On the other hand, intercala-
tor-like nucleobases such as pyrenyl C-nucleoside13,14
act as not only universal bases but also intercalators.
Our results mentioned above suggest that 4-N-[N-(quin-
ol-5-yl)carbamoyl]-dC acts as an intercalator-type
universal. On the other hand, it was suggested that,
when the guanine base is located on the opposite site
of the modified cytosine, the orientation of the N-phen-
ylcarbamoyl groupchanges to ÔproximalÕ so that a
Watson–Crick base pair is formed in the DNA duplex.
These results would provide new insight into the design
of artificial universal bases that induce change in their
geometry. Future work should be done to elucidate
the geometry of the Cqcm–G base pair in more detail.