G Model
CATTOD-9409; No. of Pages7
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2
M. Florea et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2015) xxx–xxx
XRD patterns were recorded with a Shimadzu 7000 powder
˚
diffractometer using Cu K␣ radiation (ꢀ = 1.5418 A). The data acqui-
sition was performed in the range 6–80 2 theta, with a step of
2◦ min−1
.
The chemical composition of the catalysts was determined by
inductively coupled plasma (ICP) atomic emission spectroscopy
using a Thermo Jarrell Ash Iris Advantage equipment. Prior to anal-
ysis the sample was brought into solution by alkali oxidative fusion
using NaOH/Na2O2 and subsequent dissolution with diluted HCl.
Raman spectroscopy was performed using a Horiba spectrom-
eter, equipped with a He–Ne (ꢀ = 633 nm) laser. The spectra were
recorded in the 200–1600 cm−1 range.
Thermogravimetry was performed with a Shimadzu DTG-60
instrument under dry nitrogen flow (50 mL min−1), temperature
range 25–800 ◦C with a heating-up rate of 5 ◦C min−1. Differential
thermal analysis was conducted with a Shimadsu DTA-60 instru-
ment.
Scheme 1. Vitamins of group K.
Elemental analysis was performed on a EuroEA 3000 automated
analyzer. The sample (less than 1 mg) were weighed in tin con-
tainers and were burned in a vertical reactor (oxidation tube) in
the dynamic mode at 980 ◦C in an He flow with the addition of O2
(10 mL) at the instant of sample introduction. Portions of the sam-
ple in tin capsules were placed in the automated sampler, from
which they were transferred to the oxidation tube at regular inter-
vals. The concentration of each element was calculated using the
Callidus program supplied with the analyzer.
Scheme 2. Oxidation pathway for 2-methylnaphthalene.
2.3. Catalytic tests
reasons lies in the variability in geometric and electronic structure
of surface vanadium oxides in the supported vanadium oxides [15].
In this scope a series of V2O5–Al2O3 were prepared following the
co-precipitation method, and calcined at different temperatures.
The characterization of these materials was carried out using pow-
der XRD, isotherms of adsorption of nitrogen at −196 ◦C, Raman
spectroscopy, TG–DTA and elemental analysis.
The catalytic tests were carried out in a two-necked flask
equipped with a magnetic stirrer and a condenser at atmospheric
pressure. In a typical procedure, the substrate (2-MN, 2.4 mole),
0.05 g of catalyst and 5 mL of solvent were loaded into the flask,
and then the appropriate hydrogen peroxide (27–30 wt%) was drop
wise added (0.025 mL min−1) using a liquid pump. After H2O2 was
added totally, the reaction mixture was stirred for different reaction
times.
The concentration of hydrogen peroxide prior to use and during
the reaction was determined iodometrically. The catalytic exper-
iments were carried out under vigorous stirring at temperatures
between 40 and 100 ◦C and reaction times from 0.5 till 24 h. After
completion of 2-MN oxidation and filtering off the catalyst, the
mother liquor was diluted 5 times with acetonitrile and the prod-
ucts were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) on a Thermo Scientific Accela 600 device equipped with a
UV–vis detector and a Mediterranean Sea 18 (C18) column. The
mobile phase containing 80% acetonitrile and 20% water was fed at
a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 at 25 ◦C using a two channels-detection
and an injection volume of 3 L. A maximum of absorption was
found for 2-MN at ꢀ = 265 nm and for VK3 at ꢀ = 245 nm.
2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation
Vanadia–alumina mixed oxides with different V/Al ratios were
prepared by the co-precipitation of aluminum nitrate (0.08 M) and
ammonium metavanadate (0.12 M) solutions at pH 5. Ammonium
metavanadate was firstly dissolved in hot water (60 ◦C) under vig-
orous stirring, and then acidified with nitric acid (progressively
added (drop by drop) until a pH of 3.0). To this solution, the solution
containing aluminum nitrate (0.08 M) was added in one charge, and
the pH changed to 2.5. Then, the precipitation was achieved with
aqueous ammonia (25 wt%) progressively (drop by drop) till a final
pH of 5) and the mixture was stirred for another hour. The slurry
was subsequently centrifuged and the solid was washed several
times with hot water and methanol till the complete removal of
nitrates and ammonia ions. Drying was performed in two steps:
at 60 ◦C for 4 h under vacuum, and continued at 120 ◦C, overnight
under ambient conditions. Finally, the samples were calcined at 300
or 500 ◦C for 5 h, in static air. The catalysts were denoted function
of the V/Al ration and calcination temperature (Table 1).
3.1. Catalysts characterization
elemental analysis. Surface area varied as function of V/Al ratios
and calcination temperatures. As a general trend, the surface area
increased with the decrease of the V/Al ratio, with the highest
value of 288 m2 g−1 for the VAl01 sample. Fig. 1 shows adsorption
isotherms of type IV, with hysteresis loops specific to a capillary
condensation characteristic to mesoporous materials. As expected,
further calcination at 500 ◦C induced a further decrease of the sur-
face area, which most probably is associated to a sintering process
2.2. Physico-chemical characterization
Surface areas were determined by nitrogen adsorption at
−196 ◦C on a fully computerized Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instru-
ment, using the BET formalism. The catalyst powder was degassed
for 2 h at 150 ◦C and 0.1 Pa before each adsorption measurement.
Please cite this article in press as: M. Florea, et al., Mesostructured vanadia–alumina catalysts for the synthesis of vitamin K3, Catal.