Published on Web 03/04/2005
RNA Structure Analysis at Single Nucleotide Resolution by
Selective 2′-Hydroxyl Acylation and Primer Extension
(SHAPE)
Edward J. Merino, Kevin A. Wilkinson, Jennifer L. Coughlan, and Kevin M. Weeks*
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290
Received October 11, 2004; E-mail: weeks@unc.edu
Abstract: The reactivity of an RNA ribose hydroxyl is shown to be exquisitely sensitive to local nucleotide
flexibility because a conformationally constrained adjacent 3′-phosphodiester inhibits formation of the
deprotonated, nucleophilic oxyanion form of the 2′-hydroxyl group. Reaction with an appropriate electrophile,
N-methylisatoic anhydride, to form a 2′-O-adduct thus can be used to monitor local structure at every
nucleotide in an RNA. We develop a quantitative approach involving Selective 2′-Hydroxyl Acylation analyzed
by Primer Extension (SHAPE) to map the structure of and to distinguish fine differences in structure for
tRNAAsp transcripts at single nucleotide resolution. Modest extensions of the SHAPE approach will allow
RNA structure to be monitored comprehensively and at single nucleotide resolution for RNAs of arbitrary
sequence and structural complexity and under diverse solution environments.
Introduction
is idiosyncratic, multiple reagents must be used to interrogate
all positions in an RNA, and it is difficult to ascribe a single,
unifying set of rules for the classes of structures that react versus
those that do not.
Most RNA molecules function correctly in biology only once
they fold back on themselves to form complex and difficult-
to-predict three-dimensional structures.1 In addition, the biology
of many RNAs requires that specific regions have local structural
flexibility or the ability to transition from one conformation to
another. Understanding the function of almost all RNAs thus
requires an accurate and, ideally, comprehensive knowledge of
the base-paired secondary structure and identification of nucleo-
tides involved in tertiary interactions.
Traditional chemical and enzymatic reagents2 and backbone-
based cleavage3 are useful for mapping RNA secondary struc-
ture, especially when multiple reagents are used in concert.
However, traditional approaches for monitoring base pairing and
local nucleotide flexibility suffer from two broad shortcomings.
(1) Reagents are leaky in the sense that the absolute magnitude
of discrimination between single-stranded and base-paired
regions can be small and also because helix termini and some
base pairs (especially G-U pairs) are often reactive.4 (2) The
information obtained by existing approaches is also sparse
because a given reagent typically reacts with only a subset of
the four RNA nucleotides2 or backbone sites.3 Because the
chemistry of each sparsely reactive structure-selective reagent
An alternate approach for mapping RNA structure exploits
the observation that the chemical reactivity of the 2′-ribose
position is strongly modulated by the adjacent 3′-phosphodiester
anion.5,6 Acylation of synthetic 2′-amine-substituted nucleotides
to form the 2′-amide product is strongly gated by the underlying
local nucleotide flexibility.5,7,8 Flexible nucleotides in RNA are
better able to reach a facilitated transition state in which the
3′-phosphodiester becomes appropriately positioned with the 2′-
amine to exert a catalytic effect.6 2′-Amine acylation thus
robustly detects essentially all base-paired RNA secondary
structures and many tertiary interactions when the sites of 2′-
adduct formation are mapped by primer extension.5,8
We have found that this 2′-ribose-based chemistry is signifi-
cantly more straightforward to implement than traditional
chemical or enzymatic approaches for monitoring RNA second-
ary and tertiary structure. However, introduction of an artificial
2′-amine group makes an experiment more complex, prevents
this chemistry from being used in vivo, and may perturb some
tertiary interactions involving the 2′-ribose position. We con-
sidered that the proximity of a 3′-phosphodiester anion might
modulate the reactivity of the 2′-hydroxyl group normally
present in RNA. Since every nucleotide has a 2′-hydroxyl,
structural information is, in principle, obtainable for every
(1) (a) Brion, P.; Westhof, E. Annu. ReV. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1997, 26,
113-137. (b) Gesteland, R. F.; Cech, T. R.; Atkins, J. F. The RNA World,
2 ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, 1999.
(c) Tinoco, I.; Bustamante, C. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293, 271-281.
(2) Ehresmann, C.; Baudin, F.; Mougel, M.; Romby, P.; Ebel, J.-P.; Ehresmann,
B. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15, 9109-9128.
(3) (a) Soukup, G. A.; Breaker, R. R. RNA 1999, 5, 1308-1325. (b) Helm,
M.; Brule, H.; Degoul, F.; Cepanec, C.; Leroux, J. P.; Giege, R.; Florentz,
C. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 1636-1643. (c) Wittberger, D.; Berens,
C.; Hammann, C.; Westhof, E.; Schroeder, R. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 300,
339-352.
(4) Mathews, D. H.; Disney, M. D.; Childs, J. L.; Schroeder, S. J.; Zuker, M.;
Turner, D. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 7287-7292.
(5) Chamberlin, S. I.; Weeks, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 216-224.
(6) Chamberlin, S. I.; Merino, E. J.; Weeks, K. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2002, 99, 14688-14693.
(7) (a) John, D. M.; Weeks, K. M. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 405-410. (b) John,
D. M.; Weeks, K. M. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 6866-6874. (c) John, D.
M.; Merino, E. J.; Weeks, K. M. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 611-619.
(8) Chamberlin, S. I.; Weeks, K. M. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 901-909.
9
10.1021/ja043822v CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2005, 127, 4223-4231
4223