A R T I C L E S
Peric Simov et al.
Scheme 11. Transfer of the Methyl Group from Methyl
3,5-Dinitrobenzoate to (S)-2-Methylpiperidine
Scheme 12. [1,2]-Brook Rearrangement of 16 and Isolation of
Methanol as 3,5-Dinitrobenzoatea
result of opposing induction (mismatched case). Formation of
virtually equal amounts of diastereomers 23 and 24 in the latter
case is advantageous for the preparation of chiral methanols
because both enantiomers are needed for complementary
stereochemical investigations.
[1,2]-Brook Rearrangement of (Dimethylphenylsilyl)-
methanol. Three challenges had to be overcome before the
conversion of (R)- and (S)-[1-2H1,3H]16 to the chiral methanols
could be addressed: (1) optimization of reaction conditions for
the rearrangement of (dimethylphenylsilyl)methanol; (2) isola-
tion of the formed methanol, possibly as a derivative; and (3)
optimization of the conditions for determination of the enan-
tiomeric excess of chiral methanol with unlabeled methanol.
Floss and Anet et al. found that the ee of the chiral methyl group
can be determined directly by 3H NMR spectroscopy after
transfer to the nitrogen of (R)- or (S)-2-methylpiperidine.6 We
envisaged preparing the 3,5-dinitrobenzoate of the chiral
methanol in the reaction mixture, which would hopefully
facilitate its isolation, and the subsequent transfer of the chiral
methyl group to commercial (S)-2-methylpiperidine (ee 94%).
To check whether the methyl group can be transferred, a deep
red colored mixture of methyl 3,5-dinitrobenzoate (27, 10 mg)
and (S)-2-methylpiperidine (28, 20 equiv) was heated under
argon in an NMR tube at 80 °C for 6 h (Scheme 11). One-half
of the reaction mixture was taken and diluted with CD2Cl2, and
a 1H NMR spectrum (400.13 MHz) was recorded. The ratio of
27/29/MeOH was 5:69:26, satisfactory for determination of the
ee of chiral methanol. Using the [2H1]methyl ester as electro-
a (a) t-BuOK/polar aprotic solvent/up to 6% of H2O; 20-25 °C, 16-18
h, then (b) 3,5-(O2N)2C6H3C(O)Cl/pyridine, 50 °C, 1 h (for both steps: 75-
90% of 27).
27; combined yield: 75-90%) and tert-butyl 3,5-dinitroben-
zoate (32). Monodeuterated (dimethylphenylsilyl)methanol yielded
monodeuterated benzoate (2H1: 99%), indicating that no
deuterium-hydrogen exchange took place under the strongly
basic conditions.
Preparation and Rearrangement of (R)- and (S)-(Dimeth-
ylphenylsilyl)-[1-2H1,3H]methanol. As both enantiomers of
chiral methanol were to be prepared, borylation of carbamate
(S,S)-17c with borate 22 derived from (R,R)-1,2-dicyclohexyl-
ethane-1,2-diol was used. To prepare chiral methanol of high
specific activity the tritium should be introduced via LiBEt3T.28
To make sure that all molecules contain one deuterium atom,
the dideuterated carbamate (S,S)-[1,1-2H2]17c was the appropri-
ate precursor obtained from (S,S)-17c by four cycles of
metalation and quenching with D2O in 92% yield (2H2 > 99%
by 1H NMR) (Scheme 13). The labeled carbamate was metalated
and borylated with the mixed borate 22. The two deuterated
diastereomeric boronates formed in a ratio of 1.25:1 in favor
of the less polar [1-2H1]23 in a combined yield of 72%.
Each diastereomer was reduced with freshly prepared
LiBEt3T.28 To complete the reduction excess LiBEt3H was
added only to the reaction mixture containing [1-2H1]23 after
20 min. Workup and purification furnished (1S)- and (1R)-[1-
2H1,3H]25 in yields of 68% and 77% and of high specific
activity, 11.3 (306.0 mCi)/mmol and 15.3 GBq (412.9 mCi)/
mmol, respectively. The boronates (1S)- and (1R)-[1-2H1,3H]-
24 were oxidized to silylmethanols (S)- and (R)-[1-2H1,3H]16
obtained in 60% and 90% yield, respectively. After appropriate
dilution with unlabeled 16, samples of both silylmethanols were
rearranged to the chiral, nonracemic methanols isolated as their
3,5-dinitrobenzoates (R)- and (S)-[2H1,3H-methyl]27 in yields
of 81% [3.87 GBq (104.7 mCi)/mmol] and 90% [3.83 GBq
(103.6 mCi)/mmol], respectively.
1
phile, the H NMR spectrum showed the expected AB system
for the two diastereotopic protons of the CH2D group.27
Kinetic studies revealed that the reaction rate for the Brook
rearrangement was highest in DMSO and that considerable
negative charge develops on the silicon-bearing carbon atom.10a
To minimize possible partial racemization of the intermediate
silyloxymethylanion, we effected the rearrangement of (dimeth-
ylphenylsilyl)methanol (16) in solvents containing water.12 The
[1,2]-Brook rearrangement of 16 was finished (TLC) in DMSO-
d6 containing D2O (5%) and t-BuOK (50 mg/mL) after 3 h at
ambient temperature (Scheme 12). The formed CH2DOH could
1
be detected by H NMR spectroscopy. As the methanol could
not be isolated from DMSO, which was also not compatible
with 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl chloride, it was replaced by TMU
(N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylurea) selected from a series of aprotic
solvents (DMF, HMPTA, DMPU ) 1,3-dimethyl-2-oxo-
hexahydropyrimidine,TMU) tested. The best and reproducible
results were obtained using TMU (2 mL) containing up to 0.5
mmol of (dimethylphenylsilyl)methanol, D2O (0.12 mL, 6%),
and t-BuOK (0.100 g) as base at room temperature (20-25 °C).
After 16-18 h dry THF and excess pyridine and 3,5-dinitroben-
zoy1 chloride were added, which furnished methyl (27 or [1-2H1]-
A few milligrams of the benzoate (R)-[2H1,3H-methyl]27 were
reacted with a large excess (20 equiv) of commercial (S)-2-
methylpiperidine (ee 94%29) and heated to effect methylation
at nitrogen. The cooled reaction mixture was diluted with CD2-
Cl2 before recording the 3H{1H} NMR spectrum (A, Figure 2).
It shows that the N-[2H1,3H]methyl-2-methylpiperidine was a
(28) Andres, H.; Morimoto, H.; Williams, P. G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1990, 627-628.
(29) Doller, D.; Davies, R.; Chackalamannil, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997,
8, 1275-1278.
(27) Anet, F. A. L.; Kopelevich, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3429-3431.
9
13938 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 40, 2005