on the carbamate-protected nitrogen of Boc-R-Me-Ser-â-
lactone. Vederas et al. showed that diprotected Ser-â-lactones
could be opened in higher yields than monoprotected Ser-
â-lactones due to the elimination of a base-catalyzed in-
tramolecular rearrangement that produces an oxazoline and/
or oxazolone, both of which are readily hydrolyzed to serine
upon aqueous workup.9a An additional side reaction that was
observed in their studies was the abstraction of the R-proton
in an elimination reaction resulting in the formation of
dehydroalanine.9a
Therefore, we studied the formation of Bn2N-R-Me-Ser-
â-lactone via activation of the carboxylic acid with various
coupling reagents. Previously, it was reported that BOP was
an efficient reagent for lactonization.15 In our study we chose,
PyBroP, DEPBT, HBTU, DCC/DMAP, PyBoP, and BOP.
The results are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Lactonization Study of Bn2N-R-Me-Ser
Because of the absence of an R-proton in our R-methyl-
Ser-â-lactone, we were only concerned with the formation
of the oxazoline and/or oxazolone. We therefore sought an
alternative protecting group for the amine that would
eliminate the acidic proton and be stable to Grignard-derived
organocuprates. There are only a few protecting groups that
fit these requirements, including the stabase,10 benzostabase,11
pyrrole,12 2,5-dimethylpyrrole,13 and dibenzyl.14 Dibenzyla-
tion was chosen on the basis of the yield of protection
compared to the others and because of its stability under
aqueous workup conditions.
The starting material for the synthesis of Bn2N-R-Me-Ser-
â-lactone was H2N-R-Me-Ser-OMe, which was enantio-
selectively synthesized as previously described.8 The H2N-
R-Me-Ser-OMe (1) was dibenzylated with BnBr in THF/
DMSO with NaHCO3 in a 64% yield (2, Scheme 1). The
activating agent
% yield of 4
BOP
DEPBT
HBTU
PyBroP
PyBoP
DCC/DMAP (cat.)
36
0a
82
50
36
36
a DEPBT is known to be unreactive toward alcohols.
Three of the activating agents, BOP, PyBOP, and DCC/
DMAP, produced the â-lactone in 36% yield, while PyBroP
was slightly more effective, producing the â-lactone in 50%
yield. The ineffectiveness of DEPBT as a lactonization
reagent was not surprising since it was previously reported
that DEPBT is unreactive toward alcohols.16 By far, HBTU
was the best activating reagent for the lactonization, resulting
in Bn2N-R-Me-Ser-â-lactone in 82% yield. Not only was
this reagent superior to all other activating reagents, but it
afforded yields over 15% higher than those achieved when
utilizing Mitsunobu conditions for â-lactonization.8,9a,17
In examining the structure of the â-lactone, there are two
possible mechanisms of attack. The first is O-acyl fission in
which nucleophiles attack the lactone at the carbonyl carbon,
leading to the undesired ketone intermediate. This ketone
intermediate is then attacked with a second equivalent of
the nucleophile, leading to the tertiary alcohol (Figure 1).
The second mechanism of attack involves O-alkyl fission in
which the nucleophile attacks at the methylene carbon,
resulting in the desired R-methyl amino acids and building
blocks (Figure 1). It is known that softer nucleophiles will
preferentially attack at the methylene carbon, while harder
nucleophiles attack at the carbonyl carbon.9a
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Bn2N-R-Me-Ser and Attempted
Lactonization to Bn2N-R-Me-Ser-â-Lactone
methyl ester was saponified with KOH in MeOH/H2O to
give the carboxylic acid (3) required for lactonization. As
previously described, we attempted the Mitsunobu lacton-
ization utilizing PPh3, as well as DIAD in THF.8 This
reaction was unsuccessful because of the insolubility of the
starting material. In choosing the di-N-benzyl protecting
group, we created a zwitterion that was completely insoluble
in all solvents that are compatible with the Mitsunobu
reaction, including THF, dioxane, DMF, and acetonitrile.
We employed a variety of Grignard reagents for the ring
opening of Bn2N-R-Me-Ser-â-lactone under Cu(I) catalysis.
The results of our study are listed in Table 2. The Bn2N-R-
Me-Ser-â-lactone was opened with primary alkyl Grignards
in the presence of catalytic CuBr‚SMe2 to afford Bn2N-R-
Me-norleucine (5a) and Bn2N-R-Me-homoleucine (6a) in
(10) (a) Bargar, T. M.; McCowan, J. R.; McCarthy, J. R.; Wagner, E.
R. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 678-681. (b) Basha, F. Z.; DeBernardis, J. F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 5271-5274. (c) Djuric, S.; Venit, J.; Magnus,
P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1787-1790.
(11) (a) Bonar-Law, R. P.; Davis, A. P.; Dorgan, B. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 6725-6728. (b) Bonar-Law, R. P.; Davis, A. P.; Dorgan, B. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 6721-6724.
(12) (a) Davis, A. P.; Egan, T. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 8125-
8126. (b) Kashima, C.; Maruyama, T.; Fujioka, Y.; Harada, K. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1989, 1, 1041-1046.
(15) Lall, M. S.; Ramtohul, Y. K.; James, M. N. G.; Vederas, J. C. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1536-1547.
(13) Bruekelman, S. P.; Leach, S. E.; Meakins, G. D.; Tirel, M. D. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1984, 1, 2801-2807.
(16) Liu, P.; Sun, B.-Y.; Chen, X.-H.; Tian, G.-L.; Ye, Y.-H. Synth.
Commun. 2002, 32, 473-480.
(14) Reetz, M. T.; Drewes, M. W.; Schmitz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1987, 26, 1141-1143.
(17) Arnold, L. D. K., T. H.; Vederas, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985,
107, 7105-7109.
256
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 2, 2005