Rhenium Chemistry of Azooximes
reported methods. The oxime of 2-acetylpyridine was prepared by
reaction of the ketone with hydroxylamine hydrochloride in aqueous
alkaline solution.
pure form which was dried under vacuo over fused calcium chloride.
Yield: 43 mg (66%). Anal. Calcd for C19H16N4Cl3Re: C, 38.49;
H, 2.72; N, 9.45. Found: C, 38.40; H, 2.79; N, 9.54. UV-vis (λmax
,
nm (ꢀ, M-1 cm-1); CH2Cl2 solution): 606 (1040); 445 (2600); 324
(7900). IR (KBr, cm-1): ν(Re-Cl) 322, 350; ν(NdN) 1415; ν-
Physical Measurements. UV-vis spectral measurements were
carried out with a Shimadzu UV-1601 PC spectrophotometer. IR
spectra were measured with Nicolet Magna IR 750 series II and
550 FAR IR and Perkin-Elmer L-0100 spectrometer. Proton NMR
spectra were recorded on a Bruker FT 300 MHz spectrometer. The
atom-numbering scheme used for 1H NMR is the same as that used
in crystallography. Spin-spin structure is abbreviated as follows:
s, singlet. Electrochemical measurements were performed under
nitrogen atmosphere using a model 620A electrochemical analyzer
of CH Instruments with platinum working electrode. The supporting
electrolyte was tetraethylammonium perchlorate (TEAP), and the
potentials are referenced to the saturated calomel electrode (SCE)
without junction correction. Microanalyses (C, H, N) were per-
formed using a Perkin-Elmer 2400 series II elemental analyzer.
Synthesis of Complexes. Synthesis of [ReOCl(PPh3)2(L1)]PF6,
2. The two complexes were prepared by the same general procedure
on the basis of the reaction of [Re(MeCN)Cl3(PPh3)2] with [Ag-
(L1O)(L1OH)]. Details are given below for a representative case.
[ReOCl(PPh3)2(L1a)]PF6. To a solution of [Re(MeCN)Cl3-
(PPh3)2] (100 mg, 0.120 mmol) in 20 mL of dichloromethane-
acetonitrile (1:1) was added [Ag(L1aO)(L1aOH)] (128 mg, 0.260
mmol) at -7 °C (ice-salt mixture). The resulting solution was then
stirred for 10 min affording a deep green solution that was filtered
to remove AgCl, and to the stirred filtrate an excess of NH4PF6
(49 mg, 0.30 mmol) was added. The solvent was then removed
under reduced pressure, and the solid thus obtained was thoroughly
washed with water to free any excess of NH4PF6. The product was
dried under vacuo over fused calcium chloride and then recrystal-
lized from a dichloromethane-hexane mixture. Yield: 92 mg
(71%). Anal. Calcd for C49H40N3OP3F6ClRe: C, 52.76; H, 3.61;
N, 3.77. Found: C, 52.83; H, 3.55; N, 3.81. UV-vis (λmax, nm (ꢀ,
M-1 cm-1); CH2Cl2 solution): 640 (7760); 400 (7700); 325
(13 300). IR (KBr, cm-1): ν(Re-Cl) 330; ν(RetO) 1000; ν(Nd
N) 1416; ν(P-F) 850. 1H NMR (δ (J, Hz); CDCl3 solution): 6.76-
7.66 (aromatic multiplets). Epa (vs SCE, CH3CN solution, scan rate
50 mV s-1): 1.32 V.
1
(N-H) 3250. H NMR (δ (J, Hz); CDCl3 solution): 7.21-8.03
(aromatic multiplet); 9.63 (s, N-H). Epa (vs SCE, CH3CN solution,
scan rate 50 mV s-1): 1.62 V.
[Re(NPh)Cl3(L1cH)]. Anal. Calcd for C19H15N4Cl4Re: C, 36.38;
H, 2.41; N, 8.93. Found: C, 36.47; H, 2.47; N, 8.86. UV-vis (λmax
,
nm (ꢀ, M-1 cm-1); CH2Cl2 solution): 605 (1300); 443 (3900); 327
(9000). IR (KBr, cm-1): ν(Re-Cl) 320, 350; ν(NdN) 1416; ν-
1
(N-H) 3251. H NMR (δ (J, Hz); CDCl3 solution): 7.22-7.97
(complex multiplet); 9.59 (s, N-H). Epa (vs SCE, CH3CN solution,
scan rate 50 mV s-1): 1.66 V.
Synthesis of [Re(NC6H4Y)Cl2(PPh3)(L2O)] Complexes. The
three complexes were prepared by the same general procedure on
the basis of the reaction of [Re(NC6H4Y)Cl3(PPh3)2] with L2OH
in dichloromethane solution. Details are given below for a
representative case.
[Re(NC6H4Me)Cl2(PPh3)(L2O)]. To a solution of [Re(NC6H4-
Me)Cl3(PPh3)2] (100 mg, 0.109 mmol) in 25 mL of dichloromethane
was added 24 mg (0.174 mmol) of L2OH. The resulting solution
was stirred for 3 h at room temperature, during which the color of
the solution become yellowish green. The solution was concentrated
and then subjected to chromatography on a silica gel column (25
× 1 cm, 60-120 mesh). Excess L2OH was first eluted with
dichloromethane, and then a yellowish green band was eluted with
benzene-acetonitrile (25:1) mixture. Solvent removal from the latter
elute under reduced pressure afforded [Re(NC6H4Me)Cl2(PPh3)-
(L2O)] as a yellowish green solid, which was dried under vacuo
over fused calcium chloride. Yield: 67 mg (82%). Anal. Calcd for
C32H29N3OPCl2Re: C, 50.59; H, 3.85; N, 5.53. Found: C, 50.64;
H, 3.89; N, 5.58. UV-vis (λmax, nm (ꢀ, M-1 cm-1); CH2Cl2
solution): 690 (400); 422 (4800); 338 (9100). IR (KBr, cm-1): ν-
1
(Re-Cl) 300, 320; ν(CdN) 1600; ν(N-O) 1235. H NMR (δ (J,
Hz); CDCl3 solution): 6.19-8.02 (complex multiplet); 2.94 (s, C6-
Me); 2.11 (s, C11-Me). E1/2 (vs SCE, CH3CN solution, scan rate
50 mV s-1): 1.16 V (∆Ep ) 80 mV).
[ReOCl(PPh3)2(L1b)]PF6. Anal. Calcd for C50H42N3OP3F6-
ClRe: C, 53.17; H, 3.75; N, 3.72. Found: C, 53.25; H, 3.70; N,
3.67. UV-vis (λmax, nm (ꢀ, M-1 cm-1); CH2Cl2 solution): 640
(5700); 400 (6500); 325 (11 200). IR (KBr, cm-1): ν(Re-Cl) 330;
[Re(NC6H5)Cl2(PPh3)(L2O)]. Anal. Calcd for C31H27N3OPCl2-
Re: C, 49.93; H, 3.65; N, 5.64. Found: C, 50.00; H, 3.62; N, 5.60.
UV-vis (λmax, nm (ꢀ, M-1 cm-1) CH2Cl2 solution): 696 (430);
414 (5200); 339 (8800). IR (KBr, cm-1): ν(Re-Cl) 292, 315; ν-
(CdN) 1599; ν(N-O) 1241. 1H NMR (δ (J, Hz) CDCl3 solution):
6.20-8.02 (complex multiplet): 2.96 (s, C6-Me). E1/2 (vs SCE,
CH3CN solution, scan rate 50 mVs-1): 1.17 V (∆Ep ) 80 mV).
[Re(NC6H4Cl)Cl2(PPh3)(L2O)]. Anal. Calcd for C31H26N3OPCl3-
Re: C, 47.73; H, 3.36; N, 5.39. Found: C, 47.78; H, 3.41; N, 5.35.
UV-vis (λmax, nm (ꢀ, M-1 cm-1); CH2Cl2 solution): 692 (440);
415 (4600); 338 (7900). IR (KBr, cm-1): ν(Re-Cl) 295, 318; ν-
1
ν(RetO) 1000; ν(NdN) 1415; ν(P-F) 840. H NMR (δ (J, Hz);
CDCl3 solution): 6.72-7.72 (aromatic multiplet); C(41)-Me, 2.58
(s). Epa (vs SCE, CH3CN solution, scan rate 50 mV s-1): 1.18 V.
Synthesis of [Re(NPh)Cl3(L1H)], 3, Complexes. The two
complexes were prepared by the same general procedure on the
basis of the reaction of [Re(NPh)Cl3(PPh3)2] with L1OH. The
reaction took place in dichloromethane solution at room temper-
ature, but best yields were rapidly obtained using boiling toluene
as the solvent. Details of the reaction in toluene are given below
for a representative case.
[Re(NPh)Cl3(L1aH)]. To a suspension of [Re(NPh)Cl3(PPh3)2]
(100 mg, 0.110 mmol) in 25 mL of toluene was added 24 mg (0.110
mmol) of L1aOH. The resulting mixture was heated to reflux for 1
h affording a green solution. The solvent was then removed under
reduced pressure. The residue was extracted with toluene at room
temperature and the extract concentrated to 5 mL and then subjected
to chromatography on a silica gel column (20 × 1 cm, 60-120
mesh). Following elution with pure toluene, a green band was eluted
with a toluene-acetonitrile (25:1) mixture. Solvent removal from
the elute under reduced pressure afforded [Re(NPh)Cl3(L1aH)] in
1
(CdN) 1605; ν(N-O) 1229. H NMR (δ (J, Hz); CDCl3 solu-
tion): 6.20-8.01 (complex multiplet); 2.99 (s, C6-Me). E1/2 (vs
SCE, CH3CN solution, scan rate 50 mV s-1): 1.18 V (∆Ep ) 80
mV).
X-ray Structure Determination. Single crystals of 2 (X ) H)
(0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm3), 3 (X ) Cl) (0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm3),
and 5‚H2O (Y ) Me) (0.35 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm3) were grown by
slow diffusion of hexane into dichloromethane solutions at room
temperature. Cell parameters were determined by a least-squares
fit of 30 machine-centered reflections (2θ ) 14-28°). Data were
collected with the ω-scan technique on a Siemens R3m/V four-
circle diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation
(λ ) 0.710 73 Å). Two check reflections measured after every 198
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2005 1059