We describe herein the asymmetric total synthesis of 1
highlighting our recently reported tandem ring-closing/cross-
metathesis (RCM/CM) strategy for allyl butenolide prepara-
tion.6 Our approach is outlined retrosynthetically in Scheme
1. We envisioned installation of the west-wing lactone by
alkylation of the enolate of (5S)-methyl-3-phenylsul-
fanyldihydrofuran-2-one 37 with triflate 4, which would arise
from 6 via Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation8 (SAD)
and subsequent selective diol activation/protection. Terminal
alkene 6 would, in turn, be available by straightforward
functionalization of 7. Butenolide 7 would be produced by
tandem RCM/CM with initial RCM9 of acrylate 9 preceding
CM10 with the benzyl ether of 10-undecen-1-ol (8). Hexa-
1,5-diene-3,4-diol 10,11 with the requisite (3R,4R) absolute
stereochemistry corresponding to C15 and C16 of rollicosin,
would serve as our starting material.
in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra. The (E)-stereochemistry of
the acyclic olefin was inferred from the H NMR spectrum
1
(J ) 15.4 Hz). Optimal yields were achieved by slow
addition of 11 to a 0.01 M solution of 9 and 3 equiv of 8 in
refluxing PhH via syringe pump. Despite the clear synthetic
utility of this process, surprisingly few examples of simple
triene RCM/CM reactions exist.13
It is notable that none of the dihydropyranone 12 was
isolated from the metathesis reaction, as it implies that 9
underwent initial RCM with complete regioselectivity for
generation of butenolide 13 (Scheme 3). The observed
Scheme 3. Regioselective RCM of 9
Metathesis substrate 9 could be prepared readily in
multigram quantities by mono-TBS protection of 10 and
subsequent acylation with acryloyl chloride (Scheme 2). We
Scheme 2. Preparation and RCM/CM of 9
regioselectivity can be rationalized by consideration of two
mechanistic pathways. The first is site-selective initiation by
the catalyst (LnM)) to produce intermediate 15 exclusively.14
The second is establishment of a pre-equilibrium between
intermediates 15 and 16 followed by fast formation of 13
(relative to 14) in an irreversible ring-closing step (kexchange
> k5 > k6).15 In the case of 9, the likely steric preference for
formation of 15 and the kinetic preference for five-membered
ring formation reinforce one another; thus, the observed
regiochemistry would be the predicted outcome of either
mechanistic scenario. RCM of the benzyl analogue of 9, in
which the nonacrylate olefins are not as clearly differentiated
by their steric environments, also proceeds with complete
regioselectivity for five-membered ring formation, however,
suggesting the second mechanistic pathway.6 Examples of
regioselective CM16 and chemoselectiVe RCM17 of 1,5-
hexadien-3-ol derivatives have been reported. To our knowl-
edge, however, only two other examples of regioselectiVe
RCM of 1,5-hexadien-3-yl acrylates such as 9 exist.6,13b
Studies to determine factors influencing (and thus, potential
means for manipulating) the regiochemical outcomes of such
reactions are currently underway.
were pleased to find that treatment of a solution of 9 and
coupling partner 8 with 10 mol % of second generation
Grubbs’ catalyst 1112 gave desired extended butenolide 7 as
the only isolable product in 64% yield. Assignment of the
tandem product as 7 rather than regioisomeric 12 was based
on the relatively large downfield chemical shifts of the
â-proton (7.44 ppm) and the carbonyl carbon (172.9 ppm)
(5) Lee, J. L.; Lin, C. F.; Hsieh, L. Y.; Lin, W. R.; Chiu, H. F.; Wu, Y.
C.; Wang, K. S.; Wu, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7833.
(6) Quinn, K. J.; Isaacs, A. K.; Arvary, R. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4143.
(7) White, J. D.; Somers, T. C.; Reddy, G. N. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
4991.
With reliable access to 7 using our tandem RCM/CM
approach, we turned our attention to its functionalization to
(8) Sharpless, K. B.; Amberg, W.; Bennani, Y. L.; Crispino, G. A.;
Hartung, J.; Jeong, K. S.; Kwong, H. L.; Morikawa, K.; Wang, Z. M.; Xu,
D.; Zhang, X. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 57, 2768.
(9) For a recent review on the use of RCM for synthesis of heterocycles,
see: Dieters, A.; Martin, S. F. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2199.
(10) For a recent review of CM, see: Connon, S. J.; Blechert, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 42, 1900.
(11) (a) Burke, S. D.; Sametz, G. M. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 72. (b) Crombez-
Robert, C.; Benazza, M.; Frechou, C.; Demailly, G. Carbohydr. Res. 1997,
303, 359.
(13) (a) Virolleaud, M. A.; Bressy, C.; Piva, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 8081. (b) Virolleaud, M. A.; Piva, O. Synlett 2004, 2087.
(14) Initiation of the acrylate olefin of 9 is not considered because of its
substantially reduced reactivity relative to the nonacrylate olefins.
(15) For a similar analysis of regioselective enyne RCM, see: Maifield,
S. V.; Miller, R. L.; Lee, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12228.
(16) BouzBouz, S.; Simmons, R.; Cossy, J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3465.
(17) Numerous reports of chemoselective RCM of 1,5-hexadien-3-yl
acrylates for synthesis of dihydropyranones have been made. For a leading
reference, see: Falomir, E.; Murga, J.; Ruiz, P.; Carda, M.; Marco, J. A. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5672.
(12) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.; Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
953.
1244
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 7, 2005