2770
Y. Nishio et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 2767–2770
Table 3 (continued)
Entry
R1R2NH
R3-BnNH2
Yielda (%)
77
Me
Cl
HN
NBoc
CO2Et
7 (10f)
8 (10g)
H2N
c
41 (60)
H2N
HN
a
Isolated yield.
Reaction performed at 25 mmol scale.
2.0 equiv of K2CO3 was used in the second step (B).
b
c
3. (a) Mentlein, R.; Ballwitz, B.; Schmidt, W. E. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 214, 829–835;
(b) Kieffer, T. J.; McIntosh, C. H.; Pederson, T. A. Endocrinology 1995, 136, 3585–
3596; For reviews, see (c) Deacon, C. F. Horm. Metab. Res. 2004, 36, 761–765.
4. (a) Kim, D.; Wang, L.; Beconi, M.; Eiermann, G. J.; Fisher, M. H.; He, H.; Hickey,
G. J.; Kowalchick, J. E.; Leiting, B.; Lynos, K.; Marsilio, F.; McCann, M. E.; Patel, R.
A.; Petrov, A.; Scapin, G.; Patel, S. B.; Roy, R. S.; Wu, J. K.; Wyvratt, M. J.; Zhang,
B. B.; Zhu, L.; Thronberry, N. A.; Weber, A. E. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 141–151;
(b) Miller, S. A.; St. Onge, E. L. Ann. Pharmcother. 2006, 40, 1336–1343.
5. Villhauer, E. B.; Brinkman, J. A.; Naderi, G. B.; Burkey, B. F.; Dunning, B. E.;
Prasad, K.; Mangold, B. L.; Russell, M. E.; Hughes, T. E. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
2774–2789.
6. Augeri, D. J.; Robl, J. A.; Betebenner, D. A.; Magnin, D. R.; Khanna, A.; Robertson,
J. G.; Wang, A.; Simpkins, L. M.; Taunk, P.; Huang, Q.; Han, S.-P.; Abboa-Offei, B.;
Cap, M.; Xin, L.; Tao, L.; Tozzo, E.; Welzel, G. E.; Egan, D. M.; Marcinkeviciene, J.;
Chang, S. Y.; Biller, S. A.; Kirby, M. S.; Parker, R. A.; Hamann, L. G. J. Med. Chem.
2005, 48, 5025–5037.
7. Feng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wallace, M. B.; Sttaford, J. A.; Kaldor, S. W.; Kassel, D. B.;
Navre, M.; Shi, L.; Skene, R. J.; Asakawa, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Xu, R.; Webb, D. R.;
Gwaltney, S. L. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2297–2300.
8. (a) Nishio, Y.; Kimura, H.; Tosaki, S.; Sugaru, E.; Sakai, M.; Horiguchi, M.; Masui,
Y.; Ono, M.; Nakagawa, T.; Nakahira, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 7246–
7249; (b) Nishio, Y.; Uchiyama, K.; Kito, M.; Nakahira, H. Tetrahedron 2011, 67,
3124–3131.
was accepted in this synthetic method (entry 6), it is assumed that
the basicity of NH2 and steric hindrance caused by R1R2 or R4 are
important in the second step. Based on these findings, it is believed
that a series of dialkylamines is suitable for R1R2NH, and benzylam-
ines and some kinds of alkylamines are appropriate for R4-NH2. As
our aim was to prepare proper pyrrole derivatives for DPP-4 inhib-
itors synthesis, we investigated the applications of this one-pot
reaction, while focusing on a combination of dialkylaminnes and
benzylamies (Table 3).
The above-mentioned one-pot reaction gave the target pyrrole
9 in good yield, but large-scale experiment resulted in a slight de-
crease in the yield (entry 1). As a magnetic stirrer was used in the
large-scale experiment, the discrepancy in yield is thought to be
related to stirring and/or heat efficiency. As shown in Table 1,
although other primary amines were inappropriate for this reac-
tion, other ways to remove benzyl protection have already been re-
ported.8 Therefore, other structures will be synthesized from these
pyrrole derivatives (entry 2). While a series of carbamate was ac-
cepted as R1R2 (entries 1 and 7), some R1R2NH having an amine
substituent, such as NMe2, could not be used (data not shown).
The use of amine substituted reagents in the first step finally gave
complex mixtures, and the reason is thought that a series of amine
substituents are capable of reacting with ethyl bromoacetate. Es-
ter, which can easily be changed to other substituents, such as
alcohol or amide (entry 8), was also accepted in the first step. As
for R3, a wide variety of substituents were allowed (entries 4–8).
Bromo or chloro substituted benzylamines gave moderate to good
yields and were useful in introducing various other substituents
(entries 1, 5, and 8). In some cases, the use of 2.0 equiv of potas-
sium carbonate in the second step (B) was considered as suitable
(entries 4–6 and 8).
9. Baeschlin, D. K.; Clark, D.E.; dunsdon, S. J.; Fenton, G.; Fillmore, A.; Harris, N.V.;
Higges, C.; Hurley, C.A.; Krintel, S. L.; Mackenzie, R.E.; Osterman, N.; Sirockin, F.;
Sutton, J. M. WO2007071738.
10. Kidwai, M.; Singhal, K.; Rastogi, S. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 43, 1231–1237.
11. (a) Tsuge, O.; Hatta, T.; Tashiro, H.; Kakura, Y.; Maeda, H.; Kakehi, A.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7723–7735; (b) Zaytsev, A. V.; Anderson, R. J.; Meth-
Cohn, O.; Groundwater, P. W. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5831–5836.
12. (a) Castellote, I.; Vaquero, J. J.; Alvarez-Bullia, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 769–
772; (b) Castellote, I.; Vaquero, J. J.; Fernandes-Gadea, J.; Alvarez-Bullia, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 8668–8675.
13. General procedure: to a solution of 3 (1.0 mmol) in n-BuCN (1.0 ml), R1R2NH
(1.0 equiv) was added, and then the resulting solution was stirred at 50 °C for
1 h. K2CO3 (2.0 equiv) and R3-BnNH2 (1.2 equiv) were added to the solution,
and the mixture was stirred for 5 h at 130 °C. After cooling to room
temperature, K2CO3 (2.0 equiv), NMP (1.0 ml), ethyl bromoacetate
(1.5 equiv), and H2O (10 ll) were added. The resulting mixture was stirred
for 4 h at 110 °C. The slurry was filtered through Celite, then filtrate was
concentrated, and the residue was purified by SiO2 in a column chromatgraphy
(hexane/EtOAc = 8:1–3:1).
In conclusion, we herein report a one-pot synthesis of 5-amino
4-cyano pyrrole derivatives and show its limitations and possible
scale up. This new synthetic method could easily give unique com-
pounds that are difficult to synthesize by conventional methods.
14. Analytical data of ethyl ethyl 3-amino-5-{(3R)-3-[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)
amino]piperidin-1-yl}-1-(2-chlorobenzyl)-4-cyano-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylate (9):
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 1.07 (3H, t, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.36–1.43 (1H, m), 1.50–
1.70 (2H, m), 1.75–1.83 (1H, m), 2.80–3.00 (3H, m), 3.36(1H, dd, J = 11.2,
3.3 Hz), 3.71 (1H, s), 4.12 (2H, q, J = 7.1 Hz), 4.56 (1H, s), 5.33–5.43 (2H, m),
6.53 (1H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 7.18–7.20 (2H, m), 7.32–7.40 (1H, m). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) d: 14.0, 23.0, 28.2, 29.4, 46.2, 52.3, 56.5, 59.6, 75.3, 79.3, 101,
114, 126, 127, 128, 129, 131, 136, 146, 150, 155, 161, 171. HR-MS (ESI+): m/z
502.2213 (calcd m/z 502.2216 for C25H32ClN5O4+H).
15. Analytical data of ethyl 3-amino-1-benzyl-4-cyano-5-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-pyrrole-
2-carboxylate (10a): 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) d: 1.10 (3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz), 1.45–
1.57 (6H, m), 3.00–3.10 (4H, m), 4.07 (2H, q, J = 7.1 Hz), 5.21 (2H, s), 5.83 (2H,
s), 6.97 (2H, d, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.18–7.24 (1H, m), 7.25–7.32 (2H, m). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) d: 14.3, 23.6, 28.9, 48.4, 52.7, 59.4, 74.3, 101, 115, 126, 127,
128, 138, 146, 152, 161. HR-MS (ESI+): m/z 353.1973 (calcd m/z 353.1972 for
Acknowledgment
We are thankful to Ms. M. Honma for recording high MS
spectra.
References and notes
1. For a review, see Havale, S. H.; Pal, Manojit Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 1783–
1802.
C
20H24N4O2+H).
2. For some references, see (a) Holst, J. J. Curr. Opin. Endocrin. Diabetes 2005, 12,
56–62; (b) Knudsen, L. B. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4128–4134.