Chemistry Letters 2000
1409
stitution of the stannyl moiety in (Z)-1-(silyl)-2-(stannyl)alk-1-
(1986). d) B. L. Chenard, C. M. Van Zyl, and D. R.
Sanderson, Tetrahedron Lett., 27, 2801 (1986). e) T. N.
Mitchell, R. Wickenkamp, A. Amamria, R. Dicke, and U.
Schneider, J. Org. Chem., 52, 4868 (1987). f) K. Ritter,
Synthesis, 1989, 218. g) M. Mori, N. Watanabe, N. Kaneta,
and M. Shibasaki, Chem. Lett., 1991, 1651. h) M.
Murakami, H. Amii, N. Takizawa, and Y. Ito,
Organometallics, 12, 4223 (1993).
enes by hydrogen with retention of the configuration.1g
2
3
4
E. Piers and R. T. Skerlj, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1987, 1025.
T. N. Mitchell, U. Schneider, and B. Fröhling, J.
Organomet. Chem., 384, C53 (1990).
P(OCH2)3CEt: For the use of the particular ligand in the
Pd-catalyzed addition of Si–Si and Ge–Ge bonds to
acetylenes in benzene solvent, see: (the former); H.
Yamashita, M. Catellani, and M. Tanaka, Chem. Lett.,
1991, 241. (the latter); a) T. Hayashi, H. Yamashita, T.
Sakakura, Y. Uchimaru, and M. Tanaka, Chem. Lett., 1991,
245. b) K. Mochida, C. Hodota, H. Yamashita, and M.
Tanaka, Chem. Lett., 1992, 1635.
However, strikingly enough, the destannylation of 2a did not
form the expected product, but only 1-(triethylgermyl)-1-phenyl-
ethene 4a9 {chemical shifts of vinyl protons; δ 5.89 ppm (d, 1H,
J = 2.4 Hz), 5.43 ppm (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz)} in an isolated yield
of 74%, as shown in Scheme 3. The reaction was very clean,
and no other products were formed except for tributylstannyl
iodide. Under similar reaction conditions, 2b also underwent a
migration to form 1-(p-chlorophenyl)-1-(triethylgermyl)ethene
4b10 in 80% yield. The 4a and 4b possibly form through the
Markownikov addition followed by the formation of a transient
cyclic cation, I-b, followed by destannylation forming a double
bond (the unprecedented germyl 1,2-migration), as shown in
Scheme 4.
5
A THF (5 mL) solution of 1 mmol, 4 mmol, 0.05 mmol
and 0.1 mmol of 1, phenylacetylene, Pd(dba)2 and L was
stirred at 80 °C for 50h. Treating the resulting mixture
with aqueous KF followed by purification by column chro-
matography (silica gel, hexane) gave spectroscopically
pure 2a in 85% yield. 1H-NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.24 (m, 2H),
7.13 (m, 2H), 6.98 (m, 1H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 1.4 (m, 6H), 1.26
(sep, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.07 (t, 9H, J = 7.6 Hz), 0.87 (m,
21H) ppm. Other reactions were carried out similar to the
synthesis of 2a. Reaction time; 19 h for 2b, 30 h for 2c, 40
h for 2d, and 35 h for 2e.
6
a) T. N. Mitchell, A. Amamria, H. Killing, and D.
Rutschow, J. Organomet. Chem., 241, C45 (1983). b) T. N.
Mitchell, A. Amamria, H. Killing, and D. Rutschow, J.
Organomet. Chem., 304, 257 (1986).
7
8
a) M. Kosugi, Y. Shimizu, and T. Migita, Chem. Lett.,
1977, 1423. b) D. Milstein and J. K. Stille, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 100, 3636 (1978).
Treating the resulting mixture with aqueous KF followed
by purification by column chromatography (silica gel,
hexane) gave spectroscopically pure 3a in 86% yield. 1H-
NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.41 (m, 2H), 7.29 (m, 2H), 7.22 (m, 1H),
6.02 (s, 1H), 5.77 (m, 1H), 5.01 (m, 2H), 3.33 (m, 2H),
1.07 (t, 9H, J = 7.6 Hz), 0.91 (q, 6H, J = 7.6 Hz) ppm.
To a mixture of 2a (0.23 mmol), TBAI (0.23 mmol) and
toluene (1 mL) was added dropwise hydroiodic acid (0.35
mL, 57%) at 0 °C, then stirred for 1 h. The resulting mix-
ture was washed with aqueous sodium bicarbonate.
Treating the organic layer with aqueous KF followed by
purification by column chromatography (silica gel, hexane)
gave spectroscopically pure 4a in 74% yield. 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 7.28 (m, 2H), 7.19 (m, 3H), 5.89 (d, 1H, J = 2.4
Hz), 5.43 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 1.01 (t, 9H, J = 7.6 Hz), 0.88
(q, 6H, J = 7.6 Hz) ppm.
Under similar conditions, (Z)-1-(tributylstannyl)-2-(tri-
methylsilyl)-1-phenylethene prepared by the palladium-cat-
alyzed addition of tributyl(trimethylsilyl)stannane to phenyl-
acetylene did not produce a similar type of silyl 1,2-migration.
The reaction gave 1-phenyl-2-(silyl)ethene. A full study for the
present reactions is now underway.
9
Financial support from the Shizuoka Shougou Kenkyu
Kikoh Foundation of Japan is gratefully acknowledged by one
of the authors (T. N.). The authors are indebted to Ms. Fumiyo
O-ikawa (Tokai University) for the mass measurements, espe-
cially the high resolution ones.
References and Notes
10 By a procedure similar to that for 4a, spectroscopically
1
1
a) T. N. Mitchell, H. Killing, R. Dicke, and R.
Wickenkamp, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 354.
b) B. L. Chenard. E. D. Laganis, F. Davidson, and T. V.
RajanBabu, J. Org. Chem., 50, 3666 (1985). c) B. L.
Chenard and C. M. Van Zyl, J. Org. Chem., 51, 3561
pure 4b was isolated in 80% yield. H-NMR (CDCl3) δ
7.26 (dd, 2H, J = 6.4, 2.2 Hz), 7.09 (dd, 2H, J = 6.4, 2.2
Hz), 5.86 (d, 1H, J = 2.8 Hz), 5.43 (d, 1H, J = 2.8 Hz), 1.00
(t, 9H, J = 8.4 Hz), 0.87 (q, 6H, J = 8.4 Hz) ppm.