4788
Y. Huang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4786–4789
Table 1. In vitro binding affinities of compounds 6a–g and 11 at selected 5-HT receptors
Compound
Ki (nM)a
5-HT2A
5-HT1B
5-HT1D
5-HT1A
5-HT2C
1937 794
5-HT6
5-HT7
1
6a
12.4 1.1
11.3 0.9
18.1 2.7
1.82 0.35
38.3 9.0
13.7 1.4
28.4 2.2
16.7 4.1
9.68 0.74
4.31 0.50
105.9 20.1
34.7 12.1
103.1 39.2
6.51 1.69
168.2 40.4
209.2 14.6
345.1 65.6
328.7 62.5
15.4 2.8
641 147
335 74
315 85
6739 1146
5988 958
>10,000
2410 409
469 80
841 404
5089 1272
>10,000
1412 762
342 195
>10,000
>10,000
>10,000
>10,000
>10,000
>10,000
nd
1241 521
1077 409
267.0 98.8
>10,000
6b
6c
52.5 14.2
1079 291
405 182
382 187
882 432
15.4 2.8
80.0 42.4
1008 60
4451 490
171 19
6d
6e
6.50 2.47
2833 3395
1145 1054
9954 2688
105 70
1429 286
2863 830
>10,000
6f
6g
614 117
1335 280
>10,000
11
GR127935
nd
>10,000
12.3 1.85
42.7 9.0
>10,000
nd, not determined.
a All assays were conducted in duplicate. Data are means SD of computer-derived estimates for n = 4 separate determinations.
of the phenylpiperazine moiety in the lead compound,
are well-tolerated by the 5-HT1B binding site and the
resulting compounds all retain their high binding affinity
for the 5-HT1B receptor. Replacement of the methoxy
group in the lead compound with a bulky substituent,
such as the phenyl group, also results in a compound
with high affinity and selectivity for the 5-HT1B receptor
(6e). However, strongly electron-withdrawing substitu-
ents, such as fluorine or trifluoromethyl group, placed
at the 4-position of the phenyl ring (6d and 6f) appear
to diminish the compoundsÕ affinities for 5-HT1B and
5-HT1D receptors.
receptor in vivo. Another compound, 11, was found
to be a 5-HT1B full antagonist devoid of any agonist
activity.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Alliance
for Research in Schizophrenia and Depression
(NARSAD), the Lieber Center for Schizophrenia
Research at Columbia University and the NIMH Psy-
choactive Drug Screening Program.
Among the compounds synthesized, it is notable that
the 4-chlorophenyl derivative (6c) displays a higher
affinity for the 5-HT1B receptor than both the lead
and GR127935, a compound that has been shown in
the literature to be the ligand with the highest affinity
for the 5-HT1B receptor. In our binding assays, com-
pound 6c is twice as potent as GR127935, and thus
appears to be the most potent 5-HT1B ligand reported
to date.
References and notes
1. Weinshank, R. L.; Zgombick, J. M.; Macchi, M. J.;
Branchek, T. A.; Hartig, P. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1992, 89, 3630.
2. Hartig, P. R.; Branchek, T. A.; Weinshank, R. L. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 1992, 13, 152.
3. Bonaventure, P.; Voorn, P.; Luyten, W. H.; Jurzak, M.;
Schotte, A.; Leysen, J. E. Neuroscience 1998, 82, 469.
4. Varnas, K.; Hall, H.; Bonaventure, P.; Sedvall, G. Brain
Res. 2001, 915, 47.
5. Lowther, S.; Katona, C. L.; Crompton, M. R.; Horton, R.
W. Mol. Psychiatry 1997, 2, 314.
6. Saudou, F.; Amara, D. A.; Dierich, A.; LeMeur, M.;
Ramboz, S.; Segu, L.; Buhot, M. C.; Hen, R. Science 1994,
265, 1875.
7. Rocha, B. A.; Scearce-Levie, K.; Lucas, J. J.; Hiroi, N.;
Castanon, N.; Crabbe, J. C.; Nestler, E. J.; Hen, R. Nature
1998, 393, 175.
In functional assays using the forskolin-stimulated cyclic
AMP production test,23 both compounds 1 (64% intrin-
sic activity) and GR127935 (29% intrinsic activity) dis-
played partial agonist activity. On the other hand,
compound 11 was shown to be completely devoid of
any intrinsic agonist activity, and thus appeared to be
a full antagonist for the 5-HT1B receptor.
Compounds with nanomolar or subnanomolar affinity
at the target receptor are, in general, good candidates
for development as in vivo radioligands for PET imag-
ing. Compound 6c fulfills this requirement. In addition,
it possesses functional groups (O-methyl and N-methyl)
that are amenable to labeling with a positron-emitting
[11C]methyl group and therefore is a suitable candidate
for radiolabeling and development as potential PET
radioligand.
8. Crabbe, J. C.; Phillips, T. J.; Feller, D. J.; Hen, R.;
Wenger, C. D.; Lessov, C. N.; Schafer, G. L. Nat. Genet.
1996, 14, 98.
9. Huang, Y. Y.; Oquendo, M. A.; Friedman, J. M.;
Greenhill, L. L.; Brodsky, B.; Malone, K. M.; Khait, V.;
Mann, J. J. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003, 28, 163.
10. Sari, Y. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2004, 28, 565.
11. Soyka, M.; Preuss, U. W.; Koller, G.; Zill, P.; Bondy, B.
J. Neural. Transm. 2004, 111, 101.
12. Tatarczynska, E.; Klodzinska, A.; Stachowicz, K.; Cho-
jnacka-Wojcik, E. Behav. Pharmacol. 2004, 15, 523.
13. Blier, P.; de Montigny, C. Biol. Psychiatry 1998, 44, 313.
14. Blier, P. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2001, 62, 12.
15. Parsons, L. H.; Weiss, F.; Koob, G. F. J. Neurosci. 1998,
18, 10078.
In summary, a number of compounds were synthesized
and evaluated in vitro for their binding affinity and selec-
tivity for the serotonin 5-HT1B receptor. One compound
(6c) was found to be a high affinity ligand for the 5-HT1B
receptor and a suitable candidate for development as a
PET radioligand to investigate the serotonin 5-HT1B
16. Lappalainen, J.; Long, J. C.; Eggert, M.; Ozaki, N.;
Robin, R. W.; Brown, G. L.; Naukkarinen, H.; Virkkun-