Synthesis of photoresponsive dual NIR two-photon absorptive [60]fullerene triads and tetrads

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules18089603

Broadband nonlinear optical (NLO) organic nanostructures exhibiting both ultrafast photoresponse and a large cross-section of two-photon absorption throughout a wide NIR spectrum may make them suitable for use as nonlinear biophotonic materials. We report here the synthesis and characterization of two C₆₀-(antenna)_x analogous compounds as branched triad C₆₀ (>DPAF-C₁₈)(>CPAF-C_2M) and tetrad C₆₀(>DPAF-C₁₈)(>CPAF-C_2M)₂ nanostructures. These compounds showed approximately equal extinction coefficients of optical absorption over 400-550 nm that corresponds to near-IR two-photon based excitation wavelengths at 780-1,100 nm. Accordingly, they may be utilized as potential precursor candidates to the active-core structures of photosensitizing nanodrugs for 2γ-PDT in the biological optical window of 800-1,050 nm.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules18089603

Molecules 2013, 18, 9603-9622; doi:10.3390/molecules18089603
OPEN ACCESS
molecules
ISSN 1420-3049
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules
Article
Synthesis of Photoresponsive Dual NIR Two-Photon Absorptive
[60]Fullerene Triads and Tetrads
Seaho Jeon 1, Min Wang 1, Loon-Seng Tan 2, Thomas Cooper 2, Michael R. Hamblin 3,4 and
Long Y. Chiang 1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Institute of Nanoscience and Engineering Technology,
University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
2
AFRL/RXAS, Functional Materials Division, Air Force Research Laboratory,
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH 45433, USA
3
Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Dermatology,
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
4
Harvard MIT Division of Health Science and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: Long_Chiang@uml.edu;
Tel.: +1-978-934-3663.
Received: 18 June 2013; in revised form: 30 July 2013 / Accepted: 5 August 2013 /
Published: 12 August 2013
Abstract: Broadband nonlinear optical (NLO) organic nanostructures exhibiting both
ultrafast photoresponse and a large cross-section of two-photon absorption throughout a
wide NIR spectrum may make them suitable for use as nonlinear biophotonic materials.
We report here the synthesis and characterization of two C60-(antenna)x analogous compounds
as branched triad C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) and tetrad C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2
nanostructures. These compounds showed approximately equal extinction coefficients of
optical absorption over 400–550 nm that corresponds to near-IR two-photon based
excitation wavelengths at 780–1,100 nm. Accordingly, they may be utilized as potential
precursor candidates to the active-core structures of photosensitizing nanodrugs for
2γ-PDT in the biological optical window of 800–1,050 nm.
Keywords: C60-(antenna)x nanostructures; ultrafast intramolecular energy-transfer;
NIR two-photon absorption; 2γ-photodynamic therapeutic agent; photosensitizer

Molecules 2013, 18
9604
1. Introduction
Fullerenes are nanocarbon cages with all sp2 carbons interlinked in a structure of hollow sphere.
Highly strained curving regions of the cage surface consist of chemically reactive six fulvalenyl
bridging olefins that can be utilized for making nucleophilic addition reactions. Chemical modification
of C60 on only a limit number of functionalization sites may not lead to much alternation of the cage’s
photophysical properties. Conversely, nucleophilic addition of one or two light-harvesting antenna
chromophores will largely enhance the cage’s ability to respond and perform various photoinduced
electronic and energy-related events by acting as an electron-acceptor [1,2]. The development of
broadband nonlinear optical (NLO) organic nanostructures exhibiting both ultrafast photo-response
and high efficiency in two-photon absorption throughout a wide NIR spectrum to variable laser pulses
with duration ranging from fs to ns remains as the focus of nonlinear biophotonic materials. The goal
requires the design of sophisticated, hydrophilic and biocompatible multifunctional NLO materials for
two-photon absorption (2PA) based photodynamic therapy (2γ-PDT) [3–7] against pathogens and
cancer to minimize the damage to surrounding normal tissue. Photoresponsive complex fullerene
derivatives [8–15] and a number of organic chromophores [16–19] have been found to exhibit
enhanced nonlinear photonic behavior. The control of photodynamic effect is precise due to the fact
that 2γ-PDT can only be practiced at the focal area of the laser beam that prevents side-effects arising
from the undesirable photokilling of normal cells.
The most abundant [60]fullerene is more readily available commercially in up to kilogram
quantities than a number of higher fullerenes. However, its visible absorption extinction coefficient is
rather low. This limitation can be overcome by attaching highly fluorescent chromophores as
light-harvesting antenna units, such as porphyrin [20,21] or dialkyldiphenylaminofluorene (DPAF-Cn),
to enhance visible absorption of the resulting conjugates and, in the latter cases, 2PA cross-sections in
the NIR wavelengths [10,13,14]. The absorbed photoenergy by the donor antenna was able to undergo
efficient intramolecular transfer to the fullerene acceptor moiety, leading to the generation of excited
3
1
triplet cage state (C60>)* after the intersystem crossing from its excited singlet state (C60>)*. Triplet
energy transfer from (C60>)* to molecular oxygen produces singlet oxygen (1O2) that gives the
3
cytotoxic effect to the cells in the Type-II photochemistry [22,23]. In this paper, we report the
synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of photoresponsive dual NIR two-photon absorptive
[60]fullerene triads and tetrads using the extended synthetic method for the preparation of their
corresponding monoadduct analogous C60(>DPAF-C18) 1 and C60(>CPAF-C2M) 2, as shown in Scheme 1.
These triads and tetrads are capable of undergoing 2PA-based photoexcitation process at either 780
or 980 nm making them potential precursor candidates to the active-core structures of nanodrugs
for 2γ-PDT.
2. Results and Discussion
Structural design of hybrid [60]fullerene triads and tetrads was based on both linear and nonlinear
optical characteristics of 9,9-dioctadecyl-2-diphenylaminofluorenyl-61-carbonylmethano[60]fullerene
(1), C60(>DPAF-C18) [24], and 9,9-di(2-methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorenyl-61-(1,1-dicyano-
ethylenyl)methano[60]fullerene (2), C60(>CPAF-C2M) [25], to construct an unique nanostructure

Molecules 2013, 18
9605
system with a shared C60 cage. Specifically, covalent attachment of an antenna donor chromophore to
a C60 molecule (electron-acceptor) was accomplished via a periconjugation linkage with a physical
separation distance of only <3.5 Ǻ between the donor and acceptor moieties. This led to the realization
of ultrafast intramolecular energy- and/or electron-transfer from photoexcited antenna moiety to C60 in
<130–150 fs [14] that made this type of C60-antenna conjugates, C60(>DPAF-Cn)x, capable of
exhibiting photoresponse in a nearly instantaneous time scale to protect against high-intensity
radiation. By increasing the number of attached antennae to four per C60 cage giving starburst pentad
nanostructures, highly enhanced fs 2PA cross-section values were observed in a concentration-dependent
manner [26]. Upon the chemical alteration of the keto group of C60(>DPAF-Cn) bridging between C60
and the antenna moiety to a highly electron-withdrawing 1,1-dicyanoethylenyl (DCE) group, it was
possible to extend the π-conjugation in the resulting C60(>CPAF-Cn) analogous chromophore
molecules to a close contact with the cage current. This led to a large bathochromic shift of the linear
optical absorption of C60(>CPAF-C2) moving from 410 nm (λmax) of the parent keto-compound to
503 nm with the shoulder band being extended beyond 550 nm in the UV-vis spectrum. The shift
considerably increased its light-harvesting ability in visible wavelengths and caused a nearly 6-fold
higher in the production quantum yield of singlet oxygen (1O2) from C60(>CPAF-C2M) as compared
1
with that of C60(>DPAF-C2M). The mechanism of O2 production was originated from the
3
3
intermolecular triplet-energy transfer from the (C60>)* cage moiety to O2. A large increase in the
production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by excited C60(>CPAF-C2M) explained its effective
photokilling of HeLa cells in vitro, via 1γ-PDT [25]. The observation demonstrated the
intramolecular/intramolecular interaction between the excited CPAF-Cn donor antenna moiety and the
acceptor C60 cage that was also confirmed by transient absorption spectroscopic measurements using
ns laser pulses at 480–500 nm [27]. The behavior resembles that of DPAF-Cn antenna with transient
photoexcitation at 380–410 nm reported previously [28]. By extending the same intramolecular
photophysical properties to 2PA-based excitation applications, these C60-(antenna)x analogous
nanostructures may be utilized as potential photosensitizers for 2γ-PDT at either 800 nm (with DPAF
antenna) or 1,000 nm (with CPAF antenna) that is well-suited to the biological optical window of
800–1,100 nm.
Accordingly, selective attachment of these two antenna moiety types DPAF-Cn and CPAF-Cn in
combination as hybrid chromophore addends to a single C60 cage should result in the formation of new
methano[60]fullerene triads, C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3, and tetrads, C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2
4, as shown in Scheme 1. The core chromophore moiety of 3 and 4 will then be capable of performing
dual-band 2γ-PDT-based photoinduced biocidal effects with enhanced penetration depth at
800–1,100 nm. Synthetically, preparation of 3 and 4 was accomplished by the synthesis of a
structurally well-defined monoadduct 1, followed by the attachment of one or two CPAF-C2M antenna
in sequence. A key intermediate precursor, 7-α-bromoacetyl-9,9-dioctadecyl-2-diphenylaminofluorene
(BrDPAF-C18, 8) was prepared by a three-step reaction involving first palladium catalyzed
diphenylamination of commercially available 2-bromofluorene at the C2 position of the fluorene ring
to afford DPAF 5 (Scheme1). It was followed by dialkylation at the C9 carbon position of 5 using
1-bromooctadecane as the reagent in the presence of potassium t-butoxide, as a base, in THF at
0–25 °C to give the corresponding 9,9-dioctadecyl-2-diphenylaminofluorene (DPAF-C18) in 97%
yield. Friedel-Crafts acylation of DPAF-C18 with α-bromoacetyl bromide and AlCl3 in CH2Cl-CH2Cl

Molecules 2013, 18
9606
at 0 °C for a period of 4.0 h afforded the compound 8 in a yield of 96%. Addition reaction of 8 to C60
was carried out in the presence of 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU, 1.0 eq.) at ambient
temperature for 4.0 h to result in C60(>DPAF-C18) 1 in 65% yield (based on recovered residual C60)
after column chromatographic purification.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 3 and 4.
Reagents and conditions: (i) 2-MeOCH2CH2–OMs (for 6), 1-C18H37Br (for 8), t-BuOK in THF, 0 °C–r.t., 4 h;
(ii) α-bromoacetyl bromide, AlCl3, ClCH2CH2Cl, 0 °C, 4 h; (iii) DBU, toluene, r.t., 4 h; (iv) TiCl4, pyridine,
CH2(CN)2, CHCl3, r.t., 5.0 min; (v) DBU, toluene, r.t., 4 h.

Molecules 2013, 18
9607
A similar reaction sequence was applied for the synthesis of the compound 2 by replacing two
octadecyl groups with 2-methoxyethyl groups. Thus, 2-methoxyethyl methanesulfonate was used as a
leaving group for dialkylation of DPAF 5 followed by Friedel-Crafts acylation with α-bromoacetyl
bromide and AlCl3 to yield 7-α-bromoacetyl-9,9-di(2-methoxy)ethyl-2-diphenylaminofluorene
(BrDPAF-C2M, 7), Subsequent conversion of the keto group of 7 to the corresponding 1,1-dicyano-
ethylenyl (DCE) group was carried out by the reaction using malononitrile as a reagent, pyridine as a
base, and titanium tetrachloride as a deoxygenation agent in dry chloroform at ambient temperature for
a short period of 5.0 min. The reaction resulted in the corresponding diphenylaminofluorene
BrCPAF-C2M 9 in a yield of 89% after chromatographic purification (PTLC, SiO2, CHCl3 as the
eluent). Attachment of a CPAF-C2M antenna arm to a C60 cage was carried out by identical reaction
conditions as those for 1 with DBU (1.0 eq.) at room temperature for 4.0 h to afford 7-(1,2-dihydro-
1,2-methano[60]fullerene-61-{1,1-dicyanoethylenyl})-9,9-di(2-methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorene
C60(>CPAF-C2M), 2) as orange red solids in 53% yield (based on recovered C60). The bulkiness of
DPAF-C18 and CPAF-C2M in size can prevent these two types of antenna moieties form locating in
close vicinity to each other at the cage surface. By considering the regio-location of reactive
bicyclopentadienyl olefin bonds on the fullerene surface, when the first antenna is bound at the north-
pole location, the second antenna arm is most likely to be pushed away to the equator area of the C60
sphere. Therefore, only a very limited number of multiadduct regioisomers per C60 are likely to form.
Indeed, by controlling the reaction kinetic rate with two molar equivalents of CPAF-C2M applied in the
reaction with 1 in the presence of DBU (2.0 eq.), only two clear PTLC (SiO2, toluene–ethyl acetate/9:1
as the eluent) bands in the product mixtures were observed in addition to the starting 1 (~15%). The
first less polar product band at Rf = 0.5 was found to be the bisadduct C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3
isolated as orange-brown solids in 28% yield. The second more polar product band at
Rf = 0.4 (toluene–ethyl acetate/4:1 as the eluent) was determined to be the trisadduct
C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 4 isolated as red-brown solids in 40% yield.
Spectroscopic characterization of 1 and 2 was performed mainly by: (i) the clear detection of a
group of molecular mass ion peaks with the maximum peak intensity centered at m/z 1,600 (MH+ of 1)
and 1,258 (MH+ of 2) (Supporting Information) using positive ion matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization (MALDI–TOF) mass spectroscopy and (ii) analyses of 13C-NMR spectra. The former
spectra were also accompanied with two groups of fragmented mass ion peaks at m/z 720 and 734/735
corresponding to the mass units of C60 and C60>, respectively, indicating high stability of the fullerene
cage under MALDI-MS conditions. In addition to the IR spectral analysis (Figure 1) of the carbonyl
stretching vibration band at 1,674 cm−1 for 1 and the cyano (-C≡N) stretching band centered
2,224 cm−1 for 2, chemical shifts of a keto carbonyl carbon peak at δ 188.33 and three carbons,
-C=C(CN)2, –C≡N, and =C(CN)2, in 1,1-dicyanoethylenyl (DCE) moiety of 2 at δ 167.64, 112.99, and
88.07, respectively, in their 13C-NMR spectra [Figure 2(b) and (d)], clearly consistent with both
structures. Chemical shift of the former carbonyl carbon peak agrees well with that of BrDPAF-C18 8
at δ 190.99 [Figure 2(a)]. The δ values of the latter three DCE carbons were also found to match well
with those of BrCPAF-C2M 9 [Figure 2(c)] at δ 170.85, 112.98, (–C≡N), 112.11 (–C≡N), and 84.48,
respectively. In the same spectra, the peaks at δ 40.14/41.22 and 72.48/72.30 were assigned to the
cyclopropanyl or methanofullerene carbon C61 (C60>) and fullerenyl sp3 carbons of 1/2, respectively.
The rest of aromatic carbon peaks were separated from each other into three different groups with

Molecules 2013, 18
9608
assigned chemical shifts of (i) three aminoaryl carbons of 1/2 at δ (153.55, 151.20, 148.77)/(151.83,
150.31, 149.45) in close resemblance to those of 8 and 9, respectively, (ii) phenyl and fluorenyl
carbons at δ 115–135, and (iii) fullerenyl sp2 carbons located at δ 136–148, as shown in Figure 2. A
total of 30 fullerenyl carbon (28 × 2C and 2 × 1C) signals, some with similar or slightly shifted δ, were
accounted for 58 sp2 fullerenyl carbons that fits well with a C2 molecular symmetry of the compounds
1 and 2.
Figure 1. Infrared spectra of (a) BrCPAF-C2M 9, (b) C60(>DPAF-C18) 1, (c) C60(>DPAF-C2M)
(>CPAF-C2M) 3, (d) C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 4, and (e) C60(>CPAF-C2M) 2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Wavenumber (cm−1)
Figure 2. 13C-NMR spectra of (a) BrDPAF-C18 8, (b) C60(>DPAF-C18) 1, (c) BrCPAF-C2M 9,
and (d) C60(>CPAF-C2M) 2 with three regions of carbon peaks marked by blue, green,
and brown.
phenyl/fluorenyl
aminoaryl
carbons
carbons
(a)
(b)
C=O
fullerenyl sp2 carbons
>C=O
(c)
(d)
−C≡N (CN)2C=
(CN)2C=C
fullerenyl sp2 carbons
(CN)2C=C
−C≡N (CN)2C=
ppm

Molecules 2013, 18
9609
With well-characterized structures of 1 and 2, we were able to utilize their 1H-NMR spectra for the
correlation and identification of hybrid [60]fullerene triads 3 and tetrads 4. Upon the attachment of one
CPAF-C2M antenna arm to 1, a new cyano stretching band centered at 2,223 cm−1 in addition to the
carbonyl stretching band at 1678 cm−1 were detected as expected. Intensity of characteristic
half-fullerene cage absorption band at ~526 cm−1 was found to decrease significantly going from that
of 1, 3, to 4 (Figure 1) indicating the increasing percentage of regioisomers having at least one CPAF-C2M
addend located at more than 90° away the DPAF-C18 arm (or the other side of the cage surface). Large
difference of 1H chemical shifts among alkyl groups of DPAF-C18 (methyl and the most of methylene
proton peaks at  0.69–1.29) and CPAF-C2M (singlet terminal methoxy CH3-O– proton peak at  2.95
and triplet methylenoxy –CH2-O– proton peaks centered at  2.73) allowed us to measure a clear
proton integration count to verify the structure of 3 and 4 as a bisadduct and trisadduct, respectively, as
shown in Figure 3. A more branched structure of 4 was also evident by the detection of a higher
aromatic proton integration ratio in the region of  7.5–7.8 and 8.10–8.15 [Figure 3(b) and (e)] of
CPAF moieties. The most distinguishable proton peaks at  5.5–5.7 in these spectra were assigned for
α-protons each bound on the cyclopropanyl carbon located between either the keto (for DPAF) or DCE
(for CPAF) group and the C60 cage. Owing to the fullerenyl ring current, a large down-field shift of the
 value was observed at  5.66 (for the keto α-H) and 5.51 (for the DCE α-H) from that of the
fluorenyl α-bromoketo α-H at  4.61 [Figure 3(a–c)] or  2.6 for the fluorenyl keto α-H (without
α-attachment of a bromine atom, a large shift of ~3.0 ppm). It also caused a down-field  shift of
0.44–0.48 ppm for fluorenyl protons located at the vicinity of C60> moiety that clearly revealed strong
electronic interactions between DPAF-C18/CPAF-C2M antenna moieties and the fullerene cage.
1
Figure 3. H-NMR spectra (CDCl3) of (a) BrCPAF-C2M 9, (b) C60(>CPAF-C2M) 2,
(c) C60(>DPAF-C18) 1, (d) C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3, and (e) C60(>DPAF-C18)
(>CPAF-C2M)2 4.
Hα
(a)
(b)
Hα
(c)
Hα
(d)
Hα
(e)
Hα
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
3.0
2.0
1.0 ppm
4.0

Molecules 2013, 18
9610
A number of α-H peaks were observed in the 1H-NMR spectrum of 3 [the inset of Figure 3(d)]. By
taking the consideration of four possible different orientational configurations for each regioisomer, as
examples shown in Figure 4, one regioisomeric molecule may display four keto α-Ha peaks (from the
DPAF-C18 moiety) and four DCE α-Hb peaks (from the CPAF-C2M moiety) in the region of  5.0–5.75.
Therefore, detected α-Ha peaks each in different intensities can be separately grouped into and
accounted for two major regioisomer products and one minor regioisomer product. High similarity of
molecular polarity among these regioisomers prohibited us to separate them chromatographically.
However, we were able to confirm the identical composition mass of these regioisomers by detecting
an group of sharp molecular mass ions with the maximum mass at m/z 2,136 (MH+), as shown in
Figure 5(a). It was accompanied by a relatively simple MALDI-TOF mass spectrum showing fully
fragmented mass ions at m/z 763, 735, and 720 corresponding clearly to the mass of C60[>(C=O)-H]H+,
+
C60>H+, C60 , respectively, that was consistent well with the molecular structure of triad
C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3. In the case of tetrad C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 4, a group of
sharp molecular mass ions with the maximum mass at m/z 2,673 (MH+) and similar fragmented mass
ions to those of 3 in the low mass region of m/z 720–1,000 were detected [Figure 5(b)]. These MS data
revealed high stability of aromatic diphenylaminofluorene moiety under measurement conditions.
Additional high mass groups of peaks with the peak maximum at m/z 2160 of Figure 5(a) and m/z
2,696 of Figure 5(b) are satellite peaks with an increase of 2C (m/z 24) mass from those of molecular
ion mass peaks, as common phenomena for fullerenyl nanocarbon materials, especially, under the high
laser power conditions used for the collection of high mass ions. The fragmentation pattern fits well
with the bond cleavage occurring mostly at the cyclopropanyl carbon bonds bridging the C60 cage and
DPAF-C18/CPAF-C2M antenna moiety. The overall spectra provided strong evidence for the mass
composition of 3 and 4.
Figure 4. Four possible structural conformers for each regioisomer of
C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3.
(b)
(a)
(c)
(d)

Molecules 2013, 18
9611
Figure 5. MALDI mass spectra of (a) C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3 and
(b) C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 4.
2137
2136
2135
(a)
2138
2160
763
735
720
2135
2140
2145
2150
2155
2160
2165
2136
(MH+)
920
866
965
750
866
1000
1250
1500
m/z
1750
2000
2250
(b)
2673
2696
2675
2671
763
735
720
2670
2680
2690
2700
2710
2720
2673
(MH+)
920
965
750
1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750
m/z
Optical absorption of 1 and 2 [Figure 6(d) and (c), respectively] was characterized by two
distinguishable bands centered at 260 and 325–327 nm both arising from the C60> cage moiety that
1
agrees with allowed T1u→1Ag transition bands of pristine C60 [29]. The third band with λmax at either
411 or 501 nm for 1 or 2, respectively, matches approximately with those of the corresponding
precursor compound BrDPAF-C18 [Figure 6(a)] or BrCPAF-C2M [Figure 6(b)]. These bands are in the
characteristic photoresponsive wavelength range of DPAF-C18 or CPAF-C2M antenna, respectively.
When these two types of antenna were simultaneously attached to the same C60 in 3, two absorption
bands with λmax (ε) at 413 (3.9 × 104) and 494 nm (2.3 × 104 L/mol-cm) were observed in the spectrum
showing extinction coefficient ε values matching roughly with those of 1 and 2. This clearly revealed a
1:1 ratio of DPAF-C18/CPAF-C2M in 3 consistent with its composition. As the number of CPAF-C2M
antenna being increased to two in 4, the corresponding two bands remained in the same range with λmax
(ε) at 417 (4.6 × 104) and 500 nm (4.6 × 104 L/mol-cm). The extinction coefficient ε value of the
second band is nearly double to that of 3. The structural modification resulted in approximately equal
visible absorption in intensity over the full wavelength range of 400–550 nm. Accordingly, these bands
can be utilized for the corresponding near-IR two-photon absorption excitation at 800–1,100 nm,
giving broadband characteristics of the materials while exhibiting good linear transparency beyond
800 nm [Figure 6(e) and (f)]. In the long-wavelength absorption region beyond 650 nm, a very weak
characteristic steady-state absorption band of methano[60]fullerene (C60>) moiety became noticeable
at 695 nm only at an increased concentration of 4.5 × 10−4 M in CHCl3.

Molecules 2013, 18
Figure 6. UV-vis spectra of (a) BrDPAF-C18 8, (b) BrCPAF-C2M 9, (c) C60(>CPAF-C2M) 2,
9612
(d) C60(>DPAF-C18) 1, (e) C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3, (f) C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2
4, in chloroform at a concentration of 1.0 × 10−5 M.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(e)
(f)
0.04
0.02
0.00
1.0
0.5
0.0
(>C60)
660 690 720 750
400
600
800
Wavelength (nm)
It is noteworthy that excited state intramolecular energy-transfer resonance phenomena between
the DPAF-C18 and CPAF-C2M antenna around the cage surface of 3 and 4 were observed. We first
characterized the steady-state fluorescence (FL) emission of each antenna component using the model
compound a-DPAF-C2 10 and a-CPAF-C2 11 (Scheme 1) in toluene as the spectroscopic reference.
Upon photoexcitation of 10 at 410 nm to match with the optical absorption band of DPAF-C18, strong
1
fluorescence emissions of (a-DPAF-C2)* centered at 481 nm (λmax,em) [Figure 7A(a)] were detected.
1
Likewise, strong FL emissions of (a-CPAF-C2)* centered at 543 nm (λmax,em) [Figure 7B(a)] were
observed when 11 was irradiated at 478 nm which matches with the optical absorption band of
CPAF-C2M. As expected, highly efficient intramolecular fluorescence quenching of these two bands by
C60 occurred when 1 and 2 were photoexcited at the same corresponding light wavelength, as shown in
Figure 7A(b) and 7B(b), respectively. This photophysical event led to the subsequent emission from
1
1
the (C60>)* → (C60>)o transition at 704 and 708 nm, respectively. The possible phosphorescence
3
1
emission from (C60>)* → (C60>)o transition expected at ~800–850 nm was too weak to be detected.
In the case of the bisadduct C60(>DPAF-C18)2, two FL bands with λmax at 451 and 525 (shoulder) nm
[Figure 7A(c)] were shown, indicating incomplete quenching of C60[>1(DPAF)*-C18]2 by C60> when
the number of antenna are more than one. Similarly, three fluorescence bands with λmax at 506, 531,
and 615 (broad) nm [Figure 7B(c)] were found for the bisadduct C60(>CPAF-C2M)2. Owing to high
similarity on the structural moieties, these FL bands were used as the reference for the FL
spectroscopic characterization of 3 and 4.

Molecules 2013, 18
Figure 7. Steady-state fluorescence spectra of (A) (a) 10, (b) 1 (including a Raman peak at
9613
470 nm), (c) C60(>DPAF-C18)2, (d) 3, and (e) 4 at the excitation wavelength of 410 nm and
(B) (a) 11, (b) 2 (including a Raman peak at 558 nm), (c) C60(>CPAF-C2M)2, (d) 3, and (e)
4 at the excitation wavelength of 478 nm. The concentration of all samples was 1.0 × 10−5
M in toluene.
Interestingly, upon photoexcitation of the triad 3 specifically on the DPAF-C18 antenna moiety at
410 nm, the resulting FL spectrum [Figure 7A(d)] displayed a weak broad FL band at 448 [from
1(DPAF)*-C18] and broad bands at 525–650 nm along with the 1(C60>)* emission band centered at 708 nm.
The latter broad bands fit in the similar range as those of C60[>1(CPAF)*-C2M]2. As the number of

Molecules 2013, 18
9614
CPAF-C2M antenna being increased by one to the structure of tetrad C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 4,
the intensity of broad FL bands at 525–650 nm became more pronounced while retaining the same
1
intensity of the (C60>)* emission band at 709 nm [Figure 7A(e)]. The data revealed intramolecular
Förster energy-transfer resonance from the photoexcited C60[>1(DPAF)*-C18](>CPAF-C2M)2 state to
1
both C60*(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 and C60(>DPAF-C18)[>1(CPAF)*-C2M]2 states. The latter
energy-transfer is possible since: (i) the energy level of 1(CPAF)*-C2M is lower than that of 1(DPAF)*-
C18, (ii) the energy of this FL band at 430–475 nm is slightly higher than that of the CPAF-C2M
absorption λmax at 500 nm, and (iii) there is a partial overlap of emission/absorption bands to enhance
the energy-transfer efficiency. Conversely, photoexcitation of 3 specifically on the CPAF-C2M antenna
moiety at 478 nm, the resulting FL spectrum [Figure 7B(d)] showed only a weak broad FL band at
1
540–660 nm along with the (C60>)* emission band centered at 707 nm. Intensity of the former broad
band was significantly increased using 4 [Figure 7B(e)] with photoexcitation on both two CPAF-C2M
antenna moieties. This confirmed the band was contributed from the C60(>DPAF-C18)[>1(CPAF)*-C2M]2
state, which was capable of inducing the 1C60*(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 state subsequently.
Data of femtosecond Z-scans and nonlinear light-intensity transmittance reduction measurements of
C60(>CPAF-C9), 3, and 4, performed as a function of irradiance intensity using 125-fs laser pulses at
either 780 nm (corresponding to the two-photon absorption of DPAF moieties) or 980 nm
(corresponding to the two-photon absorption of CPAF moieties) at the concentration of 5 × 10−3 M in
toluene, were provided in the supporting information. These data substantiated the nonlinear photonic
characteristics of 3 and 4 showing dual NIR two-photon absorption capability that led to large
nonlinear light-transmittance reduction in intensity in these two wavelength ranges up to the fs-laser
fluence of 120 GW/cm2. Observed sufficiently large two-photon absorption cross-section values of 3
and 4 may allow their uses as the nanocarbon core of 2γ-PDT agents after the chemical modification
with water-soluble side-chains and cationic targeting segments on the fluorene ring moiety.
3. Experimental
3.1. Materials
The reagents 1,8-diazabicyclo[5,4,0]-undec-7-ene (DBU), 1-bromooctadecane, 2-bromofluorene,
sodium t-butoxide, potassium t-butoxide, aluminum chloride, titanium chloride, rac-BINAP,
tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0), malononitrile, and 2-methoxy-ethanol, were purchased from
Aldrich Chemicals (city, state abbrev, USA) and used without further purification. The chemical
1-bromooctadecane was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Waltham, MA, USA). A
C60 sample with a purity of 99.0% was purchased from Term USA, Inc. (Fort Bragg, CA, USA). Both
C60(>DPAF-C18)2 and C60(>CPAF-C2M)2 were synthesized by the similar methods described below.
3.2. Spectroscopic Measurements
Infrared spectra were recorded as KBr pellets on a Thermo Nicolet Avatar 370 FT-IR spectrometer.
13
1H-NMR and C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance Spectrospin-500 spectrometer.
UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 750 UV-vis-NIR Spectrometer.
Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were measured using PTI Fluorescence Master Systems connected

Molecules 2013, 18
9615
with a photomultiplier (914 Photomultiplier Detection System) with Xenon short arc lamp as the
excitation source. Mass spectroscopic measurements were performed by the use of positive ion matrix-
assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI–TOF) technique on a micromass M@LDI-LR mass
spectrometer. The sample blended or dissolved in the matrix material was irradiated by nitrogen UV
laser at 337 nm with 10 Hz pulses under high vacuum. Mass ion peaks were identified for the spectrum
using the MassLynx v4.0 software. In a typical experiment, the samples of C60(>DPAF-C18),
C60(>CPAF-C2M), C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M), or C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 were dissolved
in CHCl3 in a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. The matrix of 3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid
(sinapic acid) was dissolved in THF in a concentration of 10 mg/mL. The solution of matrix (1.0 mL)
was taken and mixed with the sample solution (0.1 mL) prior to the deposition on a stainless-steel
MALDI target probe. It was subsequently dried at ambient temperature.
3.3. Synthetic Procedures
3.3.1. Synthesis of 9,9-Di(2-methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorene, DPAF-C2M (6)
Part A: In a round-bottom flask containing a mixture of triethylamine (19.9 mL, 0.14 mol),
2-methoxyethanol (10.3 mL, 0.13 mol), and anhydrous dichloroethane (150 mL) at 0 °C was added
methanesulfonyl chloride (11.1 mL, 0.14 mol) over a period of 20 min. The mixture was warmed to
ambient temperature under a nitrogen atmospheric pressure and stirred for 12 h. It was quenched by
the addition of water and washed with water (2 × 150 mL), dilute hydrochloric acid (1 × 100 mL), and
saturated sodium bicarbonate (1 × 100 mL) in sequence. The organic layer was dried over sodium
sulfate and concentrated in vacuo. The crude brownish liquid was vacuum distilled at 120−130 °C to
afford 2-methoxyethylmethanesulfonate (17.9 g) in a nearly quantitative yield; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm)
δ 4.36 (t, J = 4.41 Hz, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 4.41 Hz, 2H), 3.40 (s, 3H), and 3.05 (s, 3H).
Part B: In a round-bottom flask containing a mixture of 2-diphenylaminofluorene 5 (DPAF)
(0.52 g, 1.56 mmol) and potassium t-butoxide (0.38 g, 3.39 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL) at 0 °C was
added 2-methoxyethylmethanesulfonate (10.53 g, 3.4 mmol) over 10 min. The mixture was warmed to
ambient temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere and stirred for 4.0 h. The reaction mixture was
washed with brine (20 mL) and water (20 mL). Organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate and
concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was then purified by column chromatography [silica gel,
toluene−ethyl acetate (3:1) as the eluent] via a chromatographic fraction corresponding to Rf = 0.7 on
TLC (SiO2) with the same eluent to afford DPAF-C2M 6 as white solids in a yield of 94% (0.66 g).
12
1
16
Spectroscopic data: MALDI-MS (TOF) m/z 449 calculated for C31 H3114N1 O2; found, m/z
450 (MH+); H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm) δ 7.61 (d, J = 7.60 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.55 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d,
1
J = 7.37 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 1H), 7.28−7.24 (m, 5H), 7.18−7.10 (m, 6H), 7.13−7.00 (m, 2H),
13
3.04 (s, 6H), 2.79−2.71 (m, 4H), and 2.26−2.20 (m, 4H); C-NMR (CDCl3, ppm) δ 150.66, 149.32,
148.32, 147.95, 140.67, 135.72, 129.67, 127.79, 127.08, 124.43, 124.12, 123.18, 120.98, 119.69,
69.08, 58.77, 51.45, and 39.76.

Molecules 2013, 18
9616
3.3.2. Synthesis of 7-α-Bromoacetyl-9,9-di(2-methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorene, BrDPAF-C2M (7)
To a suspension of aluminum chloride (4.8 g, 36 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (200 mL) at 0 °C was
added a solution of DPAF-C2M 6 (5.44 g, 12.1 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (50 mL). It was added
α-bromoacetyl bromide (2.44 g, 12.1 mmol) over a period of 10 min. The mixture was stirred for 4.0 h
at 0 °C. The solution was worked up by slow addition of dilute HCl (1.0 N) solution (50 mL) while
maintaining the temperature at 0 °C. The resulting organic layer was washed subsequently with dilute
brine (2 × 50 mL) and water (2 × 50 mL) at room temperature and dried over magnesium sulfate. It
was followed by the solvent removal in vacuo. The crude products were purified by column
chromatography [silica gel, hexane−ethyl acetate (4:1) as the eluent] at its chromatographic band
corresponding to Rf = 0.2 on TLC (SiO2) with the same eluent to afford BrDPAF-C2M 7 in 91% yield
(6.3 g). Spectroscopic data: FT-IR (KBr) νmax 3,054 (w), 3037 (w), 2,925 (m), 2,871 (m), 2,804 (w),
1,693(w), 1,673 (m), 1,593 (s), 1,490 (s), 1,467 (m), 1,430 (w), 1,388 (w), 1,320 (w), 1,279 (s), 1,194
(w), 1,113 (m), 1,026 (w), 820 (w), 754 (m), 697 (m), 669 (w), and 627 (w) cm−1; UV-vis (CHCl3) λmax
1
(ε) 299 (1.4 × 104) and 407 (2.1 × 104 L/mol-cm); H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm) δ 8.03−7.99 (m, 2H), 7.69
(d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.34−7.09 (m, 10H), 7.08−7.06 (m, 2H), 4.53 (s, 2H),
3.06 (s, 6H), 2.84−2.75 (m, 4H), and 2.33−2.21 (m, 4H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 190.99, 151.81, 149.32,
149.20, 147.42, 146.14, 132.83, 131.74, 129.38, 129.29, 124.66, 123.46, 122.80, 121.81, 119.06,
117.86, 68.52, 58.29, 51.30, 38.89, and 31.05.
3.3.3. Synthesis of 7-α-Bromoacetyl-9,9-dioctadecyl-2-diphenylaminofluorene, BrDPAF-C18 (8)
Part A: In a round-bottom flask containing a mixture of 2-diphenylaminofluorene 5 (DPAF, 1.0 g,
3.0 mmol), potassium t-butoxide (1.0 g, 8.9 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL) at 0 °C was added
1-bromooctadecane (2.0 g, 6.0 mmol) over 10 min. The mixture was warmed to ambient temperature
under a nitrogen atmosphere and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was washed with brine
(40 mL) and water (40 mL) in sequence. The organic layer was dried over sodium sulfate and
concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by column chromatography [silica gel,
hexane−toluene (4:1) as the eluent] as a chromatographic fraction corresponding to Rf = 0.8 on TLC
(SiO2) with the same eluent to give 9,9-dioctadecanyl-2-diphenylaminofluorene DPAF-C18 in 97%
yield (2.44 g). Spectroscopic data: FT-IR (KBr) νmax 3,067 (w), 3,036 (w), 2,924 (s), 2,853 (s), 1,599
(m), 1,494 (m), 1,451 (w), 1,331 (w), 1,277 (m), 1,154 (w), 1,075 (w), 1,029 (w), 824 (w), 751 (m),
737 (m), 696 (m), 623 (w), and 513 (w) cm−1; MALDI-MS (TOF) m/z 838 calculated for
12
1
C H9114N1; found, m/z 839 (MH+); 1H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm)  7.63 (d, J = 6.9, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 68.2,
61
1H), 7.33−7.25 (m, 7H), 7.15−7.13 (m, 5H), 7.05−7.01 (m, 3H), 1.93−1.81 (m, 4H), 1.33−1.07 (m,
13
60H), 0.91 (t, J = 6.94 Hz, 6H), and 0.73−0.62 (m, 4H); C-NMR (CDCl3, ppm)  152.50, 148.45,
147.44, 141.29, 136.81, 129.52, 124.12, 123.98, 123.09, 122.78, 120.70, 119.93, and 119.49.
Part B: To a suspension of aluminum chloride (0.32 g, 2.4 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (50 mL) at
0 °C was added a solution of DPAF-C18 (1.0 g, 1.2 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (30 mL). It was then
added by α-bromoacetyl bromide (0.30 g, 1.5 mmol) over 10 min. The mixture was stirred for 4.0 h at
0 °C. The solution was diluted by a slow addition of water (100 mL) while maintaining the reaction
mixture temperature below 0 °C. The resulting organic layer was washed subsequently with dilute

Molecules 2013, 18
9617
hydrochloric acid (1.0 N, 30 mL) and water (2 × 30 mL), and dried over magnesium sulfate followed
by the solvent removal in vacuo. The crude yellow oil was purified by column chromatography [SiO2,
hexane−EtOAc (19:1) as the eluent] to afford BrDPAF-C18 8 in 96% yield (1.3 g). The product gave a
chromatographic Rf at 0.5 on TLC (SiO2) with the same eluent. Spectroscopic data: FT-IR (KBr) νmax
3,063 (w), 3,034 (w), 2,923 (s), 2,852 (s), 1,677 (m), 1,595 (m), 1,493 (m), 1,466 (w), 1,346 (w), 1,279
(m), 1,182 (w), 1,027 (w), 819 (w), 753 (w), 697 (m), 620 (w), and 508 (w) cm−1; UV-vis (CHCl3) λmax
(ε) 292 (1.9 × 104) and 407 (2.5 × 104 L/mol-cm); 1H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm)  7.95 (d, J = 8.18 Hz, 1H),
7.93 (s, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 7.91 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.23 Hz, 1H), 7.27−7.23 (m, 4H), 7.14−7.12 (m,
5H), 7.05−7.02 (m, 3H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 1.97−1.81 (m, 4H), 1.25−1.04 (m, 66H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.78 Hz,
6H), and 0.72−0.55 (br, 4H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 190.99 (-C=O), 153.63 (aminoaryl carbon), 151.06
(aminoaryl carbon), 148.81 (aminoaryl carbon), 147.61, 146.89, 133.96, 131.55, 129.25, 128.80,
124.36, 123.09, 122.78, 121.61, 118.82, 118.20, 55.23, 39.96, 31.90, 31.15, 29.90, 29.67, 29.64, 29.62,
29.57, 29.55, 29.34, 29.29, 23.83, 22.67, and 14.10.
3.3.4. Synthesis of 7-(1,2-Dihydro-1,2-methano[60]fullerene-61-carbonyl)-9,9-dioctadecyl-2-
diphenylaminofluorene, C60(>DPAF-C18) (1)
To a mixture of C60 (0.75 g, 1.1 mmol) and 7-α-bromoacetyl-9,9-dioctadecanyl-2-
diphenylaminofluorene (BrDPAF-C18, 8, 0.85 g, 1.1 mmol) in dry toluene (500 mL) was added DBU
(0.18 ml, 1.2 mmol) under a nitrogen atmosphere. After stirring at room temperature for 5.0 h,
suspended solids of the reaction mixture were filtered off and the filtrate was concentrated to a 10%
volume. Crude product was precipitated by the addition of methanol and isolated by centrifugation
(8000 rpm, 20 min). The isolated solid was found to be a mixture of the monoadduct and its
bisadducts. Separation of these two product fractions were made by column chromatography (silica
gel) using a solvent mixture of hexane−toluene (3:2) as the eluent. The first chromatographic band
corresponding to Rf = 0.7 on TLC (SiO2, hexane-toluene, 3:1) afforded C60(>DPAF-C18) 1 as brown
solids (1.12 g, 65% yield based on recovered C60). Spectroscopic data: FT-IR (KBr) νmax 3,440 (m),
2,920 (s), 2,849 (s), 1,674 (-C=O, m), 1,632 (m), 1,593 (s), 1,491 (m), 1,463 (m), 1,427 (m), 1,346 (w),
1,331 (w), 1,316 (w), 1,273 (m), 1,239 (w), 1,200 (m), 1,186 (w), 1157 (w), 1028 (w), 817 (w), 752
(m), 738 (w), 696 (m), 575 (w), 547 (w), 526 (m), and 490 (m) cm−1; MALDI-MS (TOF) m/z 1598
1
16
calculated for 12C123 H9114N1 O1; found, m/z 1,601, 1,600 (MH+), 1,599, 866, 839, 762, 734, and 720;
1
UV-vis (CHCl3) λmax (ε) 260 (1.3 × 105), 325 (4.7 × 104), and 411 (3.6 × 104 L/mol-cm) H-NMR
(CDCl3, ppm)  8.43 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (s, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz,
1H), 7.25−7.22 (m, 4H), 7.11−7.09 (m, 5H), 7.03−7.00 (m, 3H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 2.03−1.84 (m, 4H),
1.29−1.04 (m, 58H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.88 Hz , 6H), and 0.69 (br, 4H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 188.33 (-C=O),
153.55 (aminoaryl carbon), 151.20 (aminoaryl carbon), 148.77 (aminoaryl carbon), 147.96 (2C),
147.30 (2C), 147.20 (C), 146.73 (2C), 145.35 (2C), 145.24 (2C), 145.06 (2C), 144.96 (4C), 144.85
(2C), 144.70 (C), 144.52 (2C), 144.43 (4C), 144.13 (2C), 143.74 (2C), 143.49 (2C), 143.14 (2C),
142.96 (C), 142.91 (C), 142.83 (2C), 142.76 (2C), 142.57 (2C), 142.32 (2C), 142.07 (2C), 142.00
(2C), 141.90 (2C), 141.06 (2C), 140.76 (2C), 139.36 (2C), 136.46 (2C), 133.57, 133.22, 129.22,
128.62, 124.40, 123.15, 122.83, 122.42, 121.71, 119.14, 117.78, 72.48 (fullerenyl sp3 carbons), 55.09,
44.58, 40.14 (cyclopropanyl C60> carbon), 32.00, 30.16, 29.81, 29.56, 29.47, 24.11, 22.87, and 14.22.

Molecules 2013, 18
9618
A total of 30 carbon peaks were accounted for 58 fullerenyl sp2 carbons at  136–148 indicated a
C2-symmetry of the fullerene cage.
3.3.5. Synthesis of 7-[2-Bromo-1-(1,1-dicyanoethylenyl)-1-methyl]-9,9-di(2-dimethoxyethyl)-2-
diphenylaminofluorene, BrCPAF-C2M (9)
To a mixture of 7-α-bromoacetyl-9,9-di(2-methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorene (BrDPAF-C2M,
7, 2.17 g, 3.8 mmol) and malononitrile (0.29 g, 4.4 mmol) in dry chloroform (100 mL) was added
pyridine (3.0 mL) while stirring under a nitrogen atmosphere. To this solution, titanium tetrachloride
(1.0 mL, excess) was added in. After stirring at room temperature for 5.0 min, the reaction mixture was
quenched with water (90 mL). The resulting organic layer was washed several times with water
(100 mL each), dried over magnesium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude orange-
red oil. It was purified on a preparative chromatographic plate (PTLC, SiO2, CHCl3 as the eluent). A
product fraction collected at Rf = 0.6 [toluene−ethyl acetate (4:1) as the eluent] gave BrCPAF-C2M 9 in
89% yield (2.1 g). Spectroscopic data: FT-IR (KBr) νmax 3,058 (w), 3,035 (w), 2,924 (m), 2,870 (m),
2,855 (m), 2,809 (w), 2,226 (m), 1,593 (s), 1,547 (m), 1,490 (s), 1,468 (m), 1,451 (w), 1,384 (w), 1,346
(m), 1,318 (m), 1,279 (s), 1,191 (w), 1,113 (m), 1,028 (w), 957 (w), 821 (w), 755 (m), 698 (m), and
1
511 (w) cm−1; UV-vis (CHCl3) λmax (ε) 316 (2.1 × 104) and 489 (1.7 × 104 L/mol-cm); H-NMR
(CDCl3, ppm)  7.70−7.66 (m, 3H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.30−7.27 (m, 4H), 7.15−7.13 (m, 5H),
13
7.09−7.06 (m, 3H), 4.61 (s, 2H), 3.03 (s, 6H), 2.87−2.77 (m, 4H), and 2.32−2.18 (m, 4H); C-NMR
(CDCl3) δ 170.85 [–C=C(CN)2], 151.77 (aminoaryl carbon), 149.91 (aminoaryl carbon), 149.38 (aminoaryl
carbon), 147.28, 145.72, 132.39, 130.13, 129.36, 127.92, 124.74, 123.54, 122.91, 122.55, 121.72, 119.60,
117.55, 112.98 (–C≡N), 112.11 (–C≡N), 84.48 [=C(CN)2], 68.42, 58.31, 51.64, 38.93, and 28.68.
3.3.6. Synthesis of 7-(1,2-Dihydro-1,2-methano[60]fullerene-61-{1,1-dicyanoethylenyl})-9,9-di(2-
methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorene, C60(>CPAF-C2M) (2)
To a mixture of C60 (0.18 g, 0.25 mmol) and 7-[2-bromo-1-(1,1-dicyanoethylenyl)-1-methyl]-9,9-
di(2-methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorene (BrCPAF-C2M, 9, 0.15 g, 0.24 mmol) in dry toluene
(150 mL) was added 1,8-diazabicyclo[5,4,0]-undec-7-ene (DBU, 0.1 M, 2.6 mL) under a nitrogen
atmosphere. After stirring at room temperature for a period of 5.0 h, the reaction mixture was
concentrated to a volume of approximately 10 mL. Crude product was precipitated by the addition of
methanol and isolated by centrifugation (8,000 rpm, 20 min). The precipitate was further purified by
column chromatography [silica gel, toluene−ethyl acetate (4:1) as the eluent] at the corresponding
chromatographic Rf = 0.8 on TLC (SiO2) with the same eluent to afford C60(>CPAF-C2M) 2 in 53%
yield (0.16 g). Spectroscopic data: FT-IR (KBr) νmax 3,439 (s), 2,980 (w), 2,920 (m), 2,868 (m), 2,824
(w), 2798 (w), 2,224 (–C≡N, m), 1,629 (m), 1,594 (vs), 1,538 (m), 1,491 (m), 1,466 (m), 1,428 (m),
1,347 (m), 1,319 (m), 1,279 (s), 1,186 (m), 1,115 (m), 1,028 (w), 958 (w), 888 (w), 820 (m), 805 (w),
754 (m), 697 (m), 668 (w), 577 (w), and 527 (m) cm−1; MALDI-MS (TOF) m/z 1,257 calculated for
12
1
16
C H3114N3 O2; found, m/z 1,260, 1,259, 1,258 (MH+), 1,155, 987, 965, 919, 735, and 720; UV-vis
96
(CHCl3) λmax (ε) 260 (1.2 × 105), 327 (5.1 × 104), and 501 nm (1.7 × 104 L/mol-cm); 1H-NMR (CDCl3,
ppm) δ 8.14 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.97 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.97 Hz, 1H),
7.26−7.23 (m, 4H), 7.09−7.08 (m, 5H), 7.06−7.03 (m, 3H), 5.51 (s, 1H), 2.95 (s, 6H), 2.73 (t, J = 7.97

Molecules 2013, 18
9619
Hz, 4H), and 2.32−2.18 (m, 4H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3) δ 167.64 [–C=C(CN)2], 151.83 (aminoaryl
carbon), 150.31 (aminoaryl carbon), 149.45 (aminoaryl carbon), 147.23 (2C), 147.06 (2C), 146.07 (C),
145.69 (2C), 145.25 (4C), 145.21 (2C), 145.18 (2C), 145.15 (2C), 145.03 (2C), 144.72 (4C), 144.68
(4C), 144.53 (2C), 144.40 (2C), 144.15 (C), 143.69 (2C), 143.62 (2C), 142.94 (2C), 142.89 (4C),
142.36 (2C), 141.96 (2C), 141.94 (2C), 141.83 (2C), 141.36 (2C), 140.97 (2C), 137.31 (2C), 136.95
(2C), 132.12, 129.36, 128.46, 124.76, 123.63, 122.89, 122.39, 121.89, 119.67, 117.47, 112.99 (–C≡N),
112.92, 88.07 [=C(CN)2], 72.30 (fullerenyl sp3 carbons), 68.33, 58.26, 51.56, 41.22 (cyclopropanyl
C60> carbon), and 39.26. A total of 30 carbon peaks representing 58 fullerenyl sp2 carbons at
 136–148 indicated a C2-symmetry of the fullerene cage.
3.3.7. Synthesis of Hybrid [(9,9-Dioctadecyl-2-diphenylaminofluorenyl)-7-carbonyl]-{[9,9-(2-
dimethoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorenyl]-7-(1,1-dicyanoethylenyl)}-bis(1,2-dihydro-1,2-methano)-
[60]fullerenyl Triad C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M) (3) and its Tetrad Analogous C60(>DPAF-C18)
(>CPAF-C2M)2 (4)
To the mixture of 7-(1,2-dihydro-1,2-methano[60]fullerene-61-carbonyl)-9,9-di(octadecyl)-2-
diphenylaminofluorene C60(>DPAF-C18) 1 (0.48 g, 0.3 mmol) and 7-[2-bromo-1-(1,1-
dicyanoethylenyl)-1-methyl]-9,9-di(2-methoxyethyl)-2-diphenylaminofluorene (BrCPAF-C2M, 9, 0.37
g, 0.6 mmol) in dry toluene (100 mL) was added 1,8-diazabicyclo[5,4,0]-undec-7-ene (DBU, 0.1 M,
6.0 mL) slowly under a nitrogen atmosphere. After stirring at room temperature for a period of 5.0 h,
the reaction mixture was concentrated to a volume of approximately 10 mL. Crude product was
precipitated by the addition of methanol and isolated by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 20 min). The
isolated solid was found to be a mixture of the fullerene multiadducts. Separation of these mixture was
made by column chromatography (silica gel) using a solvent mixture of toluene–ethyl acetate (9:1) as
the eluent. The first chromatographic band gave the unreacted starting compound 1 (0.08 g, 0.05 mmol).
The second chromatographic band corresponding to Rf = 0.5 on the thin-layer chromatographic plate
[TLC, SiO2, toluene–ethyl acetate (9:1) as the eluent] afforded the bisadduct product C60(>DPAF-
C18)(>CPAF-C2M) 3 as orange-brown solids (0.15 g, 0.07 mmol) in a 28% yield [based on the
recovered C60(>DPAF-C18) amount]. The third chromatographic band corresponding to Rf = 0.4 on the
thin-layer chromatographic plate [TLC, SiO2, toluene-ethyl acetate (4:1) as the eluent] afforded the
trisadduct product C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 4 as red-brown solids (0.28 g, 0.10 mmol) in a yield
of 40% [based on the recovered C60(>DPAF-C18) amount]. Spectroscopic data of C60(>DPAF-C18)
(>CPAF-C2M) 3: FT-IR (KBr) νmax 3,424 (w), 3,063 (w), 3,030 (w), 2,921 (m), 2,850 (m), 2,223 (m),
1,678 (m), 1,593 (s), 1,568 (m), 1,537 (w), 1,492 (m), 1,465 (m), 1,426 (m), 1,346 (m), 1,277 (s),
1,202 (m), 1,115 (m), 1,074 (w), 962 (w), 895 (w), 819 (m), 753 (s), 696 (s), 578 (w), 526 (m), and
12
16
491 (w) cm−1; MALDI-MS (TOF) m/z 2,135 calculated for
C
159
1H12214N4 O3; found, m/z 2,136
(MH+), 2,135 (M+), 965, 920, 866, 763 {C60[>(C=O)-H]H+}, 735 (C60>H+), and 720 (C60 ); UV-vis
(CHCl3) λmax (ε) 255 (1.1 × 105), 304 (7.5 × 104), 413 (3.9 × 104), and 494 nm (2.3 × 104 L/mol-cm);
1H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm)  8.51−7.52 (m, 8H), 7.28−7.22 (m, 8H), 7.14−7.00 (m, 16H), 5.76−5.18 (m,
2H), 3.01−2.90 (br, 6H), 2.82−2.67 (br, 4H), 2.40−2.14 (br, 4H), 2.06−1.80 (br, 4H), 1.31−1.04 (m,
58H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.72 Hz , 6H), and 0.67 (br, 4H). Spectroscopic data of C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2
4: FT-IR (KBr) νmax 3,433 (m), 3,060 (w), 3,027 (w), 2,922 (m), 2,851 (m), 2,224 (m), 1,679 (w),
+

Molecules 2013, 18
9620
1,594 (s), 1,539 (w), 1,492 (s), 1,466 (m), 1,426 (m), 1,346 (m), 1,331 (w), 1,279 (s), 1,207 (w), 1,115
(m), 1028 (w), 958 (w), 892 (w), 818 (m), 753 (m), 697 (m), 616 (w), and 525 (w) cm−1; MALDI-MS
12
1
16
(TOF) m/z 2,672 calculated for C195 H15314N7 O5; found, m/z 2,673 (MH+), 2,672 (M+), 965, 920,
866, 763 {C60[>(C=O)-H]H+}, 735 (C60>H+), and 720 (C60 ); UV-vis (CHCl3) λmax (ε) 304 (1.1 × 105),
417 (4.6 × 104), and 500 nm (4.6 × 104 L/mol-cm); H-NMR (CDCl3, ppm)  8.44−7.46 (m, 16H),
+
1
7.09−7.03 (br, 32H), 5.57−4.72 (m, 3H), 3.08−2.86 (br, 12H), 2.73 (br, 8H), 2.21 (br, 8H), 1.91 (br,
4H), 1.3−0.95 (m, 58H), 0.86 (t, J = 6.55 Hz , 6H), and 0.64 (br, 4H).
4. Conclusions
Two new C60-(antenna)x analogous compounds as branched triad C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)
and tetrad C60(>DPAF-C18)(>CPAF-C2M)2 nanostructures were synthesized and characterized by
various spectroscopic methods. The design of 2PA-responsive chromophores was made by covalently
attaching multiple light-harvesting donor antenna units on a C60 (acceptor) via a periconjugation
linkage within a separation distance of 2.6–3.5 Ǻ. This structural design was intended to facilitate the
ultrafast femtosecond intramolecular energy-transfer process from the photoexcited C60[>1(DPAF)*-
C18](>CPAF-C2M)1or2 or C60(>DPAF-C18)[>1(CPAF)*-C2M]1or2 to the C60 cage moiety upon two-photon
pumping at either 780 or 980 nm, respectively. Interestingly, by adjustment of a higher number of
CPAF-C2M antenna, the resulting tetrads showed nearly equal absorption in extinction coefficients over
the wavelength range of 400–550 nm that corresponds to near-IR two-photon based excitation
wavelengths at 780–1,100 nm for broadband 2γ-PDT applications. We also found that the unique
feature of intramolecular Förster energy-transfer phenomena from the photoexcited high-energy
DPAF-C18 antenna unit to the low-energy CPAF-C2M moiety at the fullerene cage surface gave the
fluorescence emission at slightly longer wavelengths than 600 nm in a cascade fashion. It may be
correlated to and provide an interesting mechanism for the enhancement of 2PA cross-section values
of these hybrid C60-(antenna)x nanostructures.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary materials can be accessed at: http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/18/8/9603/s1.
Acknowledgements
The authors at UML thank the financial support of Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
under the grant number FA9550-09-1-0380 and FA9550-09-1-0183 and National Institute of Health
(NIH) under the grant number 4R01CA137108. MR Hamblin was supported by NIH R01AI058075.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Guldi, D.M.; Prato, M. Excited-state properties of C60 fullerene derivatives. Acc. Chem. Res.
2000, 33, 695−703.

Molecules 2013, 18
9621
2. Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology; Nalwa, H.S., Ed.;
American Scientific Pub.: Valencia, CA, USA, 2004; Volume 8, pp. 593−615.
3. Bhawalkar, J.D.; Kumar, N.D.; Zhao, C.-F.; Prasad, P.N. Two-photon photodynamic therapy.
J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 1997, 15, 201−204.
4. Brown, S. Photodynamic Therapy: Two photons are better than one. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 394−395.
5. Spangler, C.W.; Starkey, J.R.; Dubinina, G.; Fahlstromb, C.; Shepard, J. Optimization of targeted
two-photon PDT triads for the treatment of head and neck cancers. Proc. SPIE 2012, 8207, 820720.
6. Spangler, C.W.; Starkey, J.; Rebane, A.; Drobizhev, M.; Meng, F.; Gong, A. Synthesis,
characterization and two-photon PDT efficacy studies of triads incorporating tumor targeting and
imaging components. Proc. SPIE 2008, 6845, 68450S.
7. Dahlstedt, Z.E.; Collins, H.A.; Balaz, M.; Kuimova, M.K.; Khurana, M.; Wilson, B.C.; Phillips,
D.; Anderson, H.L. One- and two-photon activated phototoxicity of conjugated porphyrin dimers
with high two-photon absorption cross sections. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 897–904.
8. Riggs, J.E.; Sun, Y.-P. Optical limiting properties of [60]fullerene and methano[60]fullerene in
solution versus in polymer matrix: the role of bimolecular processes and a consistent nonlinear
absorption mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 485–495.
9. Maggini, M.; Faveri, C.D.; Scorrano, G.; Prato, M.; Brusatin, G.; Guglielmi, M.; Meneghetti, M.;
Signorini, R.; Bozio, R. Synthesis and optical-limiting behavior of hybrid inorganic–organic
materials from the sol–gel processing of organofullerenes. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2501–2510.
10. Chiang, L.Y.; Padmawar, P.A.; Canteewala, T.; Tan, L.-S.; He, G.S.; Kanna, R.; Vaia, R.; Lin, T.-C.;
Zheng, Q.; Prasad, P.N. Synthesis of C60-diphenylaminofluorene dyad with large 2PA cross-sections
and efficient intramolecular two-photon energy transfer. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1854–1855.
11. Koudoumas, E.; Konstantaki, M.; Mavromanolakis, A.; Couris, S.; Fanti, M.; Zerbetto, F.;
Kordatos, K.; Prato, M. Large enhancement of the nonlinear optical response of reduced fullerene
derivatives. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1529–1534.
12. Padmawar, P.A.; Canteenwala, T.; Verma, S.; Tan, L.-S.; Chiang, L.Y. Synthesis and
photophysical properties of C60-diphenylaminofluorene dyad and multiads. J. Macromol. Sci. A
Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 41, 1387–1400.
13. Padmawar, P.A.; Canteenwala, T.; Tan, L.-S.; Chiang, L.Y. Synthesis and characaterization of
two-photon absorbing diphenylaminofluorenocarbonyl-methano[60]fullerenes. J. Mater. Chem.
2006, 16, 1366−1378.
14. Padmawar, P.A.; Rogers, J.O.; He, G.S.; Chiang, L.Y.; Canteenwala, T.; Tan, L.-S.; Zheng, Q.;
Lu, C.; Slagle, J.E.; Danilov, E.; et al. Large cross-section enhancement and intramolecular
energy transfer upon multiphoton absorption of hindered diphenylaminofluorene-C60 dyads and
triads. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 4065−4074.
15. Kopitkovas, G.; Chugreev, A.; Nierengarten, J.F.; Rio, Y.; Rehspringer, J.L.; Honerlage, B.
Reverse saturable absorption of fullerodendrimers in porous SiO2 sol-gel matrices. Opt. Mater.
2004, 27, 285–291.
16. He, G.S.; Tan, L.-S.; Zheng, Q.; Prasad, P.N. Multiphoton absorbing materials: molecular
designs, characterizations, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1245−1330.
17. Spangler, C.W. Recent development in the design of organic materials for optical power limiting.
J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 2013–2020.

Molecules 2013, 18
9622
18. Mckay, T.J.; Staromlynska, J.; Wilson, P.; Davy, J. Nonlinear luminescence in a Pt: ethynyl
compound. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 1337–1341.
19. Perry, J.W. Nonlinear Optics of Organic Molecules and Polymers; Nalwa, H.S., Miyata, S., Eds.;
CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 813–840.
20. MacMahon, S.; Fong II, R.; Baran, P.S.; Safonov, I.; Wilson, S.R.; Schuster, D.I. Synthetic approaches
to a variety of covalently linked porphyrin-fullerene hybrids. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5449–5455.
21. Li, K.; Schuster, D.I.; Guldi, D.M.; Herranz, M.A.; Echegoyen, L. Convergent synthesis and
photophysics of [60]fullerene/porphyrin-based rotaxanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3388–3389.
22. Huang, Y.Y.; Sharma, S.K.; Dai, T.; Chung, H.; Yaroslavsky, A.; Garcia-Diaz, M.; Chang, J.;
Chiang, L.Y.; Hamblin, M.R. Can nanotechnology potentiate photodynamic therapy?
Nanotechnol. Rev. 2012, 1, 111–146.
23. Sperandio, F.F.; Gupta, A.; Wang, M.; Chandran, R.; Sadasivam, M.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Chiang,
L.Y.; Hamblin, M.R. Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Fullerenes and Their Derivatives;
ASME Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Biomed. Nanomed. Technol. (B&NT): Concise
Monographs Series, pp. 1–51.
24. Elim, H.I.; Jeon, S.-H.; Verma, S.; Ji, W.; Tan, L.-S.; Urbas, A.; Chiang, L.Y. Nonlinear optical
transmission properties of C60 dyads consisting of a light-harvesting diphenylaminofluorene
antenna. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 9561−9564.
25. Chiang, L.Y.; Padmawar, P.A.; Rogers–Haley, J.E.; So, G.; Canteenwala, T.; Thota, S.; Tan, L.-S.;
Pritzker, K.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Sharma, S.K.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of highly
photoresponsive fullerenyl dyads with a close chromophore antenna–C60 contact and effective
photodynamic potential. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 5280–5293.
26. Elim, H.I.; Anandakathir, R.; Jakubiak, R.; Chiang, L.Y.; Ji, W.; Tan, L.S. Large concentration-
dependent nonlinear optical responses of starburst diphenylaminofluorenocarbonyl
methano[60]fullerene pentaads. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 1826−1838.
27. El-Khouly, M.E.; Padmawar, P.; Araki, Y.; Verma, S.; Chiang, L.Y.; Ito, O. Photoinduced
processes in a tricomponent molecule consisting of diphenylaminofluorene-dicyanoethylene-
methano[60]fullerene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 884−891.
28. Luo, H.; Fujitsuka, M.; Araki, Y.; Ito, O.; Padmawar, P.; Chiang, L.Y. Inter- and intramolecular
photoinduced electron-transfer processes between C60 and diphenylaminofluorene in solutions.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 9312−9318.
29. Saito, S.; Oshiyama, A. Cohesive mechanism and energy bands of solid C60. Phys. Rev. Lett.
1991, 66, 2637–2640.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 3 and 4 are available from the authors upon request
and conditions.
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).