L. K. Gavrin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 5288–5292
5291
7. Wissner, A.; Hamann, P. R.; Nilakantan, R.; Greenber-
ger, L. M.; Ye, F.; Rapuano, T. A.; Loganzo, F. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 1411.
8. A typical preparation of target compounds 2b–t is
illustrated by the following procedure for 2h: in a 100 mL
round-bottomed flask fitted with a condenser, 4-chloro-
Derivatives 2d and 2c were the least potent in mono-
cytes and both demonstrated high protein binding,
and poor solubility and permeability. The poor physi-
cochemical properties of 2d and 2c most likely preclud-
ed TNF-a inhibition in blood.
6-fluoro-[1,7]-naphthyridine-3-carbonitrile
(0.250 g,
We have explored Tpl2 inhibition and functional TNF-a
inhibition with a class of 6-alkylamino-4-anilino-[1,7]-
naphthyridine-3-carbonitriles. In this study, it was
found that a large range of inhibitory activity depended
on the length, the hybridization, and the stereochemistry
of the tailpiece moiety, while headpiece modifications
resulted in potent Tpl2 inhibitors with less selectivity
over other kinases than the 3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl
headpiece analogs. This initial SAR study was used to
exploit continued optimization toward the discovery of
Tpl2 inhibitors for the treatment of TNF-a-driven dis-
eases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Further studies and
modifications in physicochemical properties and
improvements in in vitro and in vivo selectivity profiles
for this series will be reported in due course.
1.20 mmol) and 4-chloroaniline (0.168 g, 1.32 mmol) were
taken up in 20 mL of 2-ethoxyethanol and heated at reflux
for 1 h, until t.l.c. analysis (20% EtOAc in hexanes) showed
complete disappearance of the 4-chloronaphthyridine.
After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture
was partitioned between 40 mL of each EtOAc and 5%
Na2CO3. The aqueous layer was extracted twice more with
EtOAc, and the combined organic layers were washed
three times with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4,
filtered, and evaporated to give 4-(4-chlorophenylamino)-
6-fluoro-[1,7]-naphthyridine-3-carbonitrile as a crystalline
yellow solid, which was of sufficient purity to be used
directly in the next step: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d
7.41 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H) 7.47–7.58 (m, 2H) 8.18 (s, 1H) 8.69
(s, 1H) 9.07 (s, 1H) 10.11 (s, 1H). The product of the first
step (0.179 g, 0.600 mmol assuming 100% yield of step 1)
was taken up in a microwave vial in 3.4 mL THF, with 4-
(2-aminoethyl)morpholine (1.6 mL, 1.6 g, 12 mmol). The
sealed vial was heated in a microwave reactor at 150 ꢂC for
1 h, until t.l.c. analysis showed complete disappearance of
the starting material. Then THF was removed under
reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by
flash chromatography over silica gel (7% MeOH in
CH2Cl2) and lyophilized to give a fluffy, bright yellow
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Drs. Tarek Mansour, David
Simmons, Glenn Larsen, James Clark, and Dennis Pow-
ell for their support. We also gratefully acknowledge the
members of the Wyeth Discovery Analytical Chemistry
group for analytical and spectroscopic determinations,
Dr. Alex Gontcharov of Wyeth Discovery Synthetic
Chemistry for the large-scale preparation of 8a, Dr.
Qin Wang for protein binding results, and Satenig Guler
for assistance in preparing the manuscript.
1
solid (105 mg, 43% yield of 2 steps): H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6) d 2.43 (br s, 4H) 2.56 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H) 3.37 (q,
J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H) 3.49–3.64 (m, 4H) 6.65 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H)
7.01 (s, 1H) 7.31 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2 H) 7.46 (d, J = 8.8 Hz,
2H) 8.28 (s, 1H) 8.85 (s, 1H) 9.63 (s, 1H); HRMS (ESI+)
calcd for C21H22ClN6O (MH+) 409.1538, found 409.1542.
9. Tpl2/Cot activity was directly assayed using GST-MEK1
as a substrate. The phosphorylation on serine residues 217
and 221 of GST-MEK1 was detected by an ELISA.
Briefly, 0.4 nM Tpl2 was incubated with 35 nM GST-
MEK1 in a kinase reaction buffer containing 20 mM
Mops, pH 7.2, 50 lM ATP, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT,
25 mM b-glycerophosphate, 5 mM EGTA, and 1 mM
sodium orthovanadate for 1 h at 30ꢂC. Compounds
solubilized in 100% DMSO were pre-diluted in assay
buffer so that the final concentration of DMSO in the
reaction was 1%. The kinase reaction was carried out in
100 ll volume on 96-well plates. The kinase reaction was
then stopped with the addition of 100 mM EDTA. The
entire reaction mix was then transferred to the detection
plate, a 96-well Immunosorb plate that had been pre-
coated with anti-GST antibody (Amersham). After 1 h
incubation at room temperature, the detection plate was
washed four times with TBST (TBS + 0.05% Tween 20)
and then incubated for another hour at room temperature
with anti- phospho-MEK1 antibody (Cell Signaling)
1:1000 in 10 mM Mops 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween
20, 0.1% gelatin, 0.02% NaN3, and 1% BSA. The detection
plate was washed again and incubated for 30 min with
DELFIA Europium (Eu) labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG
(Perkin-Elmer), 1:4000 in the same buffer used for the
primary incubation. After a final wash, Eu detection
solution was added to each well and the Eu signal was
measured in a Wallac Victor Multilabel Counter. Data
were imported into Excel and IC50 calculations were
performed using the Xlfit (IDBS) software package.
References and notes
1. Feldmann, M.; Mani, R. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2001, 19,
163.
2. Jarvis, B.; Faulds, D. Drugs 1999, 57, 945; Maini, R.; St.
Clair, E. W.; Breedveld, F.; Furst, D.; Kalden, J.;
Weisman, M.; Smolen, J.; Emery, P.; Harriman, G.;
Feldmann, M.; Lipsky, P. Lancet 1999, 354, 1932.
3. (a) Sasai, H.; Higashi, T.; Nakamori, S.; Miyoshi, J.;
Suzuki, F.; Nomura, T.; Kakunaga, T. Br. J. Cancer 1993,
67, 262; (b) Miyoshi, J.; Higashi, T.; Mukai, H.; Ohuchi,
T.; Kakunaga, T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991, 11, 4008; (c)
Schlesinger, T. K.; Franger, G. R.; Yujiri, T.; Johnson, G.
L. Front. Biosci. 1998, 3, D1181.
4. (a) Dumitru, C. D.; Ceci, J. D.; Tsatsanis, C.; Konoyian-
nis, D.; Stamatakis, K.; Lin, J. H.; Patriotis, C.; Jenkins,
N. A.; Copeland, N. G.; Kollias, G.; Tsichlis, P. N. Cell
2000, 103, 1071; (b) Eliopoulos, A. G.; Dumitru, C. D.;
Wang, C. C.; Cho, J.; Tsichlis, P. N. EMBO J. 2002, 21,
4831.
5. (a) Lin, X.; Cunningham, E. T., Jr.; Mu, Y.; Gelziunas,
R.; Greene, W. C. Immunity 1999, 10, 271; (b) Chiarello,
M.; Marinissen, M. J.; Gutkind, J. S. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000,
20, 1747; (c) Salmeron, A.; Ahmad, T. B.; Carlile, G. W.;
Pappin, D.; Narsimhan, R. P.; Ley, S. C. EMBO J. 1996,
15, 817.
6. Luciano, B.; Hsu, S.; Channavajhala, P. B.; Lin, L.-L.;
Cuozzo, J. W. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 52117.
10. (a) Wissner, A.; Berger, D. M.; Boschelli, D. H.; Floyd, B.
M.; Greenberger, L. M.; Gruber, B. C.; Johnson, B. D.;