Communications
=
259.7 ppm (d, JC,P = 10.1 Hz; W C). IR (KBr): n˜ = 2000, 1902, 1857,
1842 cmÀ1. C21H20NO4PW: calcd. C 44.63, H 3.57, N 2.48; found C
44.44, H 3.40, N 2.55.
Pergamon, Oxford, 1995, p. 549; c)M. A. Schwindt, J. R. Miller,
L. S. Hegedus, J. Organomet. Chem. 1991, 413, 143.
[3] For reviews on different aspects of metal–carbene chemistry,
see: a)K. H. Dötz, H. Fischer, P. Hofmann, R. Kreissel, U.
Schubert, K. Weiss, Transition Metal Carbene Complexes, Verlag
Chemie, Deerfield Beach, FL, 1983; b)K. H. Dötz, Angew.
Chem. 1984, 96, 573; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 587;
c)W. D. Wulff in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 5 (Eds.:
B. M. Trost, I. Fleming), Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, p. 1065; d)H.
Rudler, M. Audouin, E. Chelain, B. Denise, R. Goumont, A.
Massoud, A. Parlier, A. Pacreau, M. Rudler, R. Yefsah, C.
Alvarez, F. Delgado-Reyes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1991, 20, 503;
e)D. B. Grötjahn, K. H. Dötz, Synlett 1991, 381; f)W. D. Wulff
in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II, Vol. 12 (Eds.:
E. W. Abel, F. G. A. Stone, G. Wilkinson), Pergamon, Oxford,
1995, p. 470; g)D. F. Harvey, D. M. Sigano, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96,
271; h)R. Aumann, H. Nienaber, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1997,
41, 163; i)B. Alcaide, L. Casarrubios, G. Domínguez, M. A.
Sierra, Curr. Org. Chem. 1998, 2, 551; j)M. A. Sierra, Chem. Rev.
2000, 100, 3591; k)A. de Meijere, H. Schirmer, M. Duetsch,
Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 4124; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3964; l)J. Barluenga, J. Flórez, F. J. Faæanµs, J. Organomet.
Chem. 2001, 624, 5.
General Procedure for the photochemical reactions of complexes 3
and 6: Photochemical reactions were conducted with a 450-W
medium-pressure Hg lamp through a Pyrex filter in dry, degassed
MeCN containing MeOH (10:1 ratio)or in MeCN, THF, and MeOH
(5:5:1 ratio)in a sealed Pyrex tube filled with argon. In a typical
experiment, after irradiation for 10 h the solution (0.015m)was
filtered through a short pad of celite, the solvents were removed
under reduced pressure, and the crude product was submitted to flash
chromatography to give pure complexes, unless otherwise specified.
5a: yellow solid (71%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 2.28 (d,
J = 5.2 Hz, 3H; CH3), 2.46 (m, 2H; CH2P), 3.85 (m, 1H; CH2N), 3.93
(m, 1H; CH2N), 7.34–7.59 (m, 10H; HAr), 7.86 ppm (q, J = 5.2 Hz,
1H; CH). 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): d = 26.0 (CH3), 30.7 (d, JC,P
21.2 Hz; CH2P), 69.6 (d, JC,P = 10.1 Hz; CH2N), 128.8 (d, JC,P = 9.9 Hz;
Ar), 130.2 (d, JC,P = 1.7 Hz; CAr), 131.9 (d, JC,P = 12.2 Hz; CAr), 135.5
=
C
(d, JC,P = 40.4 Hz; CAr), 172.9 (CH), 203.0 (d, JC,P = 7.0 Hz; CO), 210.1
(d, JC,P = 32.0 Hz; CO), 211.6 ppm (d, JC,P = 5.1 Hz; CO). IR (KBr):
n˜ = 2008, 1867, 1838 cmÀ1. C20H18NO4PW: calcd. C 43.58, H 3.29, N
2.54; found C 43.39, H 3.33, N 2.41.
7a: yellow solid (46%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 2.21 (m,
1H; CH2P), 2.48 (m, 1H; CH2P), 2.76 (m, 1H; CH2N), 2.89 (d, J =
5.9 Hz, 3H; CH3), 3.20 (m, 1H; CH2N), 7.32–7.62 ppm (m, 10H; HAr).
13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): d = 30.0 (d, JC,P = 21.6 Hz; CH2P), 48.1
(CH3), 56.1 (d, JC,P = 10.2 Hz; CH2N), 128.7 (d, JC,P = 3.9 Hz; CAr),
128.9 (d, JC,P = 3.6 Hz; CAr), 130.3 (CAr), 131.7 (d, JC,P = 12.7 Hz; CAr),
132.1 (d, JC,P = 12.6 Hz; CAr), 134.8 (d, JC,P = 19.9 Hz; CAr), 135.3 (d,
[4] A. Hafner, L. S. Hegedus, G. de Weck, B. Hawkins, K. H. Dötz,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8413.
[5] L. S. Hegedus, G. de Weck, S. DꢀAndrea, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 2122.
[6] Strictly speaking tungsten(0)Fischer carbene complexes may
experience loss of CO ligands as well as syn–anti isomerization
upon irradiation. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge
these complexes are photo-inert toward nucleophiles. The
irradiation of chromium(0)carbene complexes with UV light
also produces CO extrusion and syn–anti isomerization of the
group tethered to the ligand. See: K. O. Doyle, M. L. Gallagher,
M. T. Pryce, A. D. Rooney, J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 617, 269.
For the purposes of this work we will always refer to visible light
photochemistry, using medium-pressure Hg lamps, a Pyrex filter,
and a Pyrex well. Under these conditions medium-pressure Hg
lamps radiate predominantly at 365 – 366 nm as well as signifi-
cant amounts in the visible region at 404 – 408, 436, 546, and
577 – 579 nm. Under these experimental conditions, to the best
of our knowledge, only photocarbonylation and carbene-transfer
processes have been reported for chromium(0)and molybde-
num(0)carbene complexes. See references [1] and [2].
JC,P = 22.9 Hz; CAr), 202.9 (d, JC,P = 6.8 Hz; CO), 204.0 (d, JC,P
=
7.8 Hz; CO), 210.2 (d, JC,P = 31.9 Hz; CO), 210.8 ppm (d, JC,P
=
4.1 Hz; CO). IR (CCl4): n˜ = 2012, 1954, 1888 cmÀ1. C19H18NO4PW:
calcd. C 42.33, H 3.37, N 2.60; found C 42.28, H 3.50, N 2.74.
8: pale-yellow oil (11%). The solvent was removed in vacuo and
the residue was dissolved in a mixture of hexane and EtOAc (1:1)and
exposed to direct sunlight until a clear solution was obtained. The
solution was then filtered through a short pad of celite, the solvent
eliminated, and the residue was purified by flash column chromatog-
raphy to yield pure compound. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 0.86
(d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H; CH3C), 1.91 (s, 3H; CH3N), 3.31 (q, J = 6.9 Hz,
1H; CHCH3), 3.54 (s, 3H; CH3O), 3.92 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 2H; AB
system, CH2), 6.95–7.59 ppm (m, 14H; HAr). 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 14.0 (CH3C), 36.5 (CH3N), 51.1 (CH3O), 56.9 (CH), 60.7
(CH2), 126.1 (d, JC,P = 13.2 Hz; CAr), 128.4 (d, JC,P = 9.1 Hz; CAr),
130.1, 131.2 (d, JC,P = 9.4 Hz; CAr), 131.6 (CAr), 131.8 (d, JC,P = 8.6 Hz;
[7] M. A. Sierra, I. Fernµndez, M. J. Mancheæo, M. Gómez-Gallego,
M. R. Torres, F. P. Cossío, A. Arrieta, B. Lecea, A. Poveda, J.
JimØnez-Barbero, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9572.
C
J
Ar), 132.0 (CAr), 133.2 (CAr), 133.6 (d, JC,P = 12.0 Hz; CAr), 145.5 (d,
C,P = 9.4 Hz; CAr), 174.0 ppm (CO). 31P NMR (internal H3PO4
reference): d = 34.2 ppm. IR (CCl4): n˜ = 1736, 1437, 1194, 1159,
1119 cmÀ1. C24H20NO3P: calcd. C 70.75, H 6.43, N 3.44; found C
70.60, H 6.61, N 3.59.
[8] I. Fernµndez, M. A. Sierra, M. Gómez-Gallego, M. J. Mancheæo,
F. P. Cossío, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 20, 5988.
[9] The 1H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture shows the
presence of the cyclic phosphane–amine analogue to 7 (signals at
d = 2.73 (d)and 3.62 ppm (m)as the main reaction product.
However, all attempts to isolate this compound were fruitless.
The crude reaction mixture was oxidized and chromatographed
to isolate compound 8 (see Scheme 4).
Received: May 10, 2005
Revised: September 23, 2005
Published online: November 22, 2005
[10] a)J. D. Coyle, Chem. Rev. 1978, 78, 97; b)A. G. Gilbert, J.
Baggott, Essentials of Molecular Photochemistry, Blackwell
Science, Oxford, 1991, pp. 328 – 329.
[11] a)R. Hoffmann, Science 1981, 211, 995; b)R. Hoffmann, Angew.
Chem. 1982, 94, 711; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1982, 21, 711.
[12] a)C. K. Murray, B. P. Warner, V. Dragisich, W. D. Wulff, R. D.
Rogers, Organometallics 1990, 9, 3142; b)I. Fernµndez, M. J.
Mancheæo, M. Gómez-Gallego, M. A. Sierra, T. Lejon, L. K.
Hansen, Organometallics 2004, 23, 1851.
Keywords: carbene ligands · carbonylation · photochemistry ·
rearrangement · tungsten
.
[1] a)M. A. McGuire, L. S. Hegedus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
5538; b)L. S. Hegedus, M. A. McGuire, L. M. Schultze, C. Yijun,
O. P. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2680.
[2] For reviews on the photochemistry of Group 6 metal–carbene
complexes, see: a)L. S. Hegedus, Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4105;
b)L. S. Hegedus in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry
II, Vol. 12 (Eds.: E. W. Abel, F. G. A. Stone, G. Wilkinson),
[13] Preliminary DFT calculations carried out at the uB3LYP/6-
31 g(d)&LANL2DZ + DZPVE level of theory are consistent
with these mechanistic proposals.
128
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 125 –128