Organometallics
Article
mixture with pentane. Thus, while 1 appears to dehydrogenate
benzyl alcohol, the resultant adduct does not easily liberate
benzaldehyde, preventing turnover. Complex 2 is also formed,
albeit in lower yields, by reaction of 1 with stoichiometric
amounts of benzyl alcohol and base (Figure 3). Crystalline 2 is
Figure 4. Solid-state structures of 1 and 2 with ellipsoids shown at
50% probability levels. With the exception of the hydride in 1 and
aldehyde proton in 2, hydrogen atoms and select atom labels are
omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg): 1:
Ru1−P1 2.2812(6), Ru1−P2 2.4116(6), Ru1−N1 2.1966(19), Ru1−
Cl1 2.5455(6), Ru1−C45 1.831(3), C45−O1 1.161(3); P1−Ru1−P2
169.51(2), P1−Ru1−Cl1 96.17(2), P2−Ru1−C1l 93.94(2), P1−
Ru1−C45 89.23(8), P2−Ru1−C45 91.87(8), C45−Ru1−Cl1
99.32(8). 2: Ru1−P1 2.2668(11), Ru1−P2 2.3899(11), Ru1−N1
2.164(3), Ru1−O1 2.104(3), Ru1−C45 2.136(4), Ru1−C52
1.822(4), C45−O1 1.344(5), C52−O2 1.175(5); P1−Ru1−P2
102.95(4), P1−Ru1−C52 91.40(13), P2−Ru1−C52 95.47(14),
N1−Ru1−P1 81.28(9), C45−Ru1−P1 118.58(13), C45−Ru1−N1
85.80(15), C45−O1−Ru1 72.8(2), O1−Ru1−C45 36.94(14), C52−
Ru1−N1 171.43(16), C52−Ru1−O1 100.29(16).
Figure 3. Dehydrogenation of benzyl alcohol and formation of 2.
only sparingly soluble in toluene or benzene and does appear
to liberate benzaldehyde upon heating or sonication, instead
decomposing to unidentified metal-containing products.
Despite the numerous reports of Ru-based alcohol
dehydrogenation catalysis, isolated Ru η2-adducts of benzalde-
hyde turned out to be quite rare. To our knowledge, only two
such complexes have been crystallographically characterized
and solution characterization data was not delineated.40,41
Complex 2 proved stable/soluble enough to obtain both
solution and solid-state structural information. In solution, the
metal-bound aldehyde CH resonates considerably upfield and
shows coupling to both phosphines (δH: 4.52 ppm; virtual
triplet, JPH = 5 Hz) consistent with significant back-bonding
from the metal. The 31P{1H} resonances of 2 appeared as a set
of doublets (68.12 and 37.50 ppm; JPP = 38.38 Hz) with a
smaller JPP coupling constant indicating a cis arrangement of
the two phosphorus nuclei. Both the carbonyl and
benzaldehyde group frequencies are observed by FT-IR
spectroscopy, with absorptions assigned to νCO = 1896
cm−1 (vs) and νRubenzaldehyde = 1584 cm−1 (m). The carbonyl
stretching frequency is only slightly lower than that in 1, while
the η2-benzaldehyde stretch is significantly lower than that of
the free organic molecule.
Single crystals suitable for crystallographic analysis could be
grown for both 1 and 2 (Figure 4). For 1, this enabled
confirmation of the geometry of the major isomer as assigned
by multinuclear NMR, with a hydride trans to a chloride. The
solid-state structure of 2 is best described as having a Ru(0)
sitting within a distorted trigonal bipyramid, with an η2-
aldehyde and two phosphines occupying the equatorial plane,
and a carbonyl and phenanthridinyl nitrogen in axial positions.
The elongation of the aldehyde CO bond [C45−O1
1.344(5) Å] is consistent with stabilization of the low valent
Ru center through significant π back-bonding; the CO
distance is longer than that in the most closely related
structurally characterized Ru−η2-aldehyde complex, [Ru(η2-
OCHPh)(trop2dae), trop2dae = N,N′-bis(5H-dibenzo[a,d]-
cyclohepten(5-yl)-1,4-diaminoethane); d(η2-CO): 1.310(9)
Å], which furthermore lacks an additional π-acidic CO ligand
and whose precursor K[Ru(H)(trop2dae)] is a potent
precatalyst for the production of H2 from alcohols in the
presence of water.41 The enhanced back-bonding and
accompanying stability may speak to the reluctance of 2 to
turn over following dehydrogenation of 1 equiv of primary
alcohol.
Considering that 1 can mediate the dehydrogenation of
benzyl alcohol in the presence of exogenous base but is
reluctant to dissociate the generated benzaldehyde, we
proceeded to investigate the dehydrogenation of a secondary
alcohol to see if increased steric bulk could promote
dissociation of the oxidized product. Complex 1 proved still
sluggish in the acceptorless dehydrogenation of cyclohexanol.
1
Only ∼5% conversion to cyclohexanone was observed by H
NMR after 24 h reaction time in a capped vial at room
temperature using 0.33 mol % catalyst loading. In an open
reflux, activity is moderately boosted to 18% conversion. The
fate of 1 proved more interesting. Isolation and recrystalliza-
tion of the organometallic product (3) from the reaction
mixtures gave orange crystals in ∼20% yield based on Ru, on
average. The 31P{1H} NMR spectrum contained three coupled
resonances. Two of these resonances are consistent with
retention of a P^N ligand (64.9 ppm; d, JPP = 258 Hz) and a
PPh3 (32.4 ppm; d, JPP = 160 Hz), though the coupling
constants make it clear these two nuclei do not couple to each
other. The third resonance appeared considerably downfield,
with a chemical shift more consistent with a bridging
phosphide (111.5 ppm; dd, JPP = 258, 160 Hz). In the
hydride region of the 1H NMR spectrum, the hydride
resonances of 1 have been replaced with a triplet of doublets
2
(−8.24 ppm; JHP = 18.5, 6.8 Hz). X-ray crystallographic
analysis of 3 (Figure 5) revealed the formation of a binuclear
dimer, where two Ru centers are bridged by a hydride, a
phosphide, and an imide derived from P−C and C−H
activation of two P^N ligands.
Activation of a diphenylphosphino P−C unit with insertion
of Ru into a P−Ph bond appears to have led to phenyl group
transfer, while C−H activation at the 6-position of a
phenanthridine ligand arm forms an unusual κ2-Ru1, μ2-
Ru1,Ru2 arrangement supporting the Ru−Ru unit (Figure 6).
Formation of a related dimer via P−C bond cleavage and
C
Organometallics XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX