benzaldehyde at 0 °C for 4 h to afford R-trifluoromethyl-
â-hydroxypropanoic imide 1 in 73% yield as a mixture of
syn and anti isomers in a ratio of 73:27 (Table 1, entry 1).
Table 1. Evans-Aldol and Reformatsky Reactions
Figure 1. Retrosynthesis of R-trifluoromethyl-â-hydroxy carbox-
ylic acid derivatives 1.
approach to 1, has been believed to be less attractive thus
far because the enolate 2 is very labile due to susceptibility
of â-elimination of fluoride ion3 as well as lower nucleo-
philicity induced by the electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl
group. Herein, we wish to disclose the first enantioselective
syntheses of 1 via highly syn-selective Evans-aldol reaction
and highly anti-selective Reformatsky reaction.
First, we examined the Evans-aldol reaction4,5 of chiral
imide 3 which could easily be prepared from oxazolidinone
and 3,3,3-trifluoropropanoic acid according to the literature
method (Scheme 1, path A).6 To a solution of 1.0 equiv of
Scheme 1
a Determined by 19F NMR. b Values in parentheses are of isolated yield.
In entries 18-25, yields were based on the aldehydes. c Not determined.
d The absolute configuration was determined on the basis of X-ray
crystallographic analysis. e The reaction was carried out using 1.2 equiv of
aldehyde at 0 °C for 3 h. f Carried out at 0 °C.
Switching a Lewis acid from BF3‚Et2O to TiCl4 led to a
significant improvement of the diastereoselectivity, non-
Evans syn product being obtained in good yield (entry 3).
Et2AlCl did not promote the reaction efficiently (entry 2).
Eventually, the best yield was given when 0.3 equiv of TiCl4
was employed (entry 4), and the use of 0.1 equiv of TiCl4
caused a significant decrease of the yield (entry 5). As shown
in entries 6-12, various types of aldehydes, such as
p-tolaldehyde, p-anisaldehyde, n-butyraldehyde, crotonalde-
hyde, etc., could participate nicely in the aldol reaction to
give the corresponding adducts 1 in good yields with high
diastereoselectivity. However, the reaction with a bulky
aldehyde, such as isobutyraldehyde, proceeded reluctantly
to afford the desired product in only 15% yield, but high
syn stereoselection was observed (entry 11).
3 in CH2Cl2 was added 1.5 equiv each of TMSOTf and Et3N
in this order at -20 °C. After the reaction mixture was stirred
at the reflux temperature for 0.5 h, 19F NMR analysis
revealed that the starting imide was completely consumed
and the corresponding silyl ketene acetal was formed as a
single stereoisomer. Without purification, the silyl ketene
acetal was treated with 1.2 equiv each of BF3‚Et2O and
(3) (a) Yokozawa, T.; Nakai, T.; Ishikawa, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984,
25, 3987. (b) Yokozawa, T.; Nakai, T.; Ishikawa, N. Chem. Lett. 1987,
1971.
(4) For recent examples of the aldol reaction of nonfluorinated imides:
(a) Nerz-Stormes, M.; Thornton, E. R. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2489. (b)
Ager, D. J.; Prakash, I.; Schaad, D. R. Aldrichim. Acta 1997, 30, 3. (c)
Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W.; Tabet, E. A.; Chaudhary, K. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 894. (d) Evans, D. A.; Tedrow, J. S.; Shaw, J. T.; Downey, C.
W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 392.
(5) For the aldol reaction of fluorinated carbonyl compounds: (a)
Ishihara, T. Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi 1992, 50, 347. (b) Lefebvre, O.;
Brigaud, T.; Portella, C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1941. (c) Huang, X. T.;
Chen, Q. Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3231. (d) Sato, K.; Sekiguchi, T.;
Ishihara, T.; Konno, T.; Yamanaka, H. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 154. (e) Itoh,
Y.; Yamanaka, M.; Mikami, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13174.
(6) For the synthesis of imide 3: Prashad, M.; Liu, Y.; Kim, H.; Repic,
O.; Blacklock, T. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 3479.
We next investigated the Reformatsky reaction7,8 of
2-bromo-3,3,3-trifluoropropanoic imide 4, which could be
prepared via bromination of the silyl ketene acetal derived
(7) For recent examples of the Reformatsky reaction of nonfluorinated
imides: (a) Furstner, A. Synthesis 1989, 571. (b) Ito, Y.; Terashima, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6629. (c) Ito, Y.; Terashima, S. Tetrahedron
1991, 47, 2821.
1130
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 6, 2006