Paper
RSC Advances
5 J. E. Bara, T. K. Carlisle, C. J. Gabriel, D. Camper,
A. Finotello, D. L. Gin and R. D. Noble, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 2009, 48, 2739–2751.
required in order to more accurately predict solubility
selectivity values for these systems.
6 J. H. Davis and K. J. Forrester, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
1621–1622.
7 S. Sanghi, E. Willet, C. Versek, M. Tuominen and E.
B. Coughlin, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 848–853.
Conclusions
A series of twelve novel 1,2,4-triazolium-based ionic liquids
have been synthesized and their physicochemical properties
studied. Ten of the compounds remained as free flowing
liquids at room temperature, effectively expanding the avail-
able library of room-temperature ILs. The ILs displayed high
thermal stability under both ambient and inert atmospheres.
Overall, while triazolium ILs showed higher viscosities, these
displayed CO2 solubility and selectivity values comparable to
imidazolium-based ILs. Previous reports on imidazolium-
based IL showed a direct correlation between increasing CO2
selectivity and solubility properties with viscosity and length of
substituting alkyl groups. In the present study, the triazolium
compounds displayed more complex correlations. For
instance, the CO2 adsorption properties greatly changed for
isomeric compounds having similar viscosity values. This
effect was clearly seen for isopropyl and n-propyl substituted
triazolium compounds, as well as for ortho and para-substitu-
tions of the –OCF3 group in aryl-derivatives. Also, addition of
perfluoro groups appears to have a beneficial effect on the
solubility of CO2, as compared to fully protonated, and to
fluorinated benzyl groups. COSMOtherm calculations showed
significant agreement between calculated and experimental
values for the alkyl-bearing ILs. Triazolium-bearing aryl
substitutions proved to be a challenge to model properly
using the currently established parameters in COSMOtherm.
The latter results demonstrate that further refinement is
needed for accurately modeling more complex systems. We are
currently using the experimental values acquired for the ILs in
this study to develop new methods to increase the validity of
computational parameters for 1,2,4-triazolium ILs. Therefore,
triazolium-based cations are important model systems for
developing a more complete understanding of small changes
in the ionic volume of cations, as well as shifts in the anion–
cation interactions which are crucial for the development of
ILs with enhanced separation properties.
8 M. W. Schmidt, M. S. Gordon and J. A. Boatz, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 2005, 109, 7285–7295.
9 J. Z. Vlahakis, S. Mitu, G. Roman, E. P. Rodriguez, I.
E. Crandall and W. A. Szarek, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2011, 19,
6525–6542.
10 N. Rios-Lombardia, R. Porcar, E. Busto, I. Alfonso,
J. Montejo-Bernardo, S. Garcia-Granda, V. Gotor, S.
V. Luis, E. Garcia-Verdugo and V. Gotor-Fernandez,
ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1921–1928.
11 P. J. Carlson, S. Bose, D. W. Armstrong, T. Hawkins, M.
S. Gordon and J. W. Petrich, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2012, 116,
503–512.
12 Q. H. Lin, Y. C. Li, Y. Y. Li, Z. Wang, W. Liu, C. Qi and S.
P. Pang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 666–674.
13 P. K. Swain, H. Singh and S. P. Tewari, J. Mol. Liq., 2010,
151, 87–96.
14 R. E. Baltus, R. M. Counce, B. H. Culbertson, H. M. Luo, D.
W. DePaoli, S. Dai and D. C. Duckworth, in 13th Symposium
on Separation Science and Technology for Energy Applications,
Gathinburg, TN, 2003, pp. 525–541.
15 D. Camper, J. E. Bara, D. L. Gin and R. D. Noble, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 2008, 47, 8496–8498.
16 J. H. Davis, Chem. Lett., 2004, 33, 1072–1077.
17 B. E. Gurkan, J. C. de la Fuente, E. M. Mindrup, L. E. Ficke,
B. F. Goodrich, E. A. Price, W. F. Schneider and J.
F. Brennecke, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 2116–2117.
18 M. J. Muldoon, S. Aki, J. L. Anderson, J. K. Dixon and J.
F. Brennecke, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111, 9001–9009.
19 H. B. Nulwala, C. N. Tang, B. W. Kail, K. Damodaran,
P. Kaur, S. Wickramanayake, W. Shi and D. R. Luebke,
Green Chem., 2011, 13, 3345–3349.
20 M. B. Shiflett, D. W. Drew, R. A. Cantini and A. Yokozeki,
Energy Fuels, 2010, 24, 5781–5789.
21 C. M. Teague, S. Dai and D. E. Jiang, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2010,
114, 11761–11767.
22 C. M. Wang, H. M. Luo, D. E. Jiang, H. R. Li and S. Dai,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5978–5981.
23 D. Wappel, G. Gronald, R. Kalb and J. Draxler, Int. J.
Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4, 486–494.
24 Y. F. Hu, Z. C. Liu, C. M. Xu and X. M. Zhang, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2011, 40, 3802–3823.
25 K. Z. Sumon and A. Henni, Fluid Phase Equilib., 2011, 310,
39–55.
26 C. Cadena, J. L. Anthony, J. K. Shah, T. I. Morrow, J.
F. Brennecke and E. J. Maginn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
5300–5308.
Acknowledgements
This work was fully sponsored by the Division of Chemical
Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy
Sciences, U. S. Department of Energy.
References
27 S. Aparicio, M. Atilhan and F. Karadas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
2010, 49, 9580–9595.
28 M. Diedenhofen and A. Klamt, Fluid Phase Equilib., 2010,
294, 31–38.
29 L. Vidal, M. L. Riekkola and A. Canals, Anal. Chim. Acta,
2012, 715, 19–41.
1 J. S. Wilkes, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 73–80.
2 V. I. Parvulescu and C. Hardacre, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
2615–2665.
3 T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071–2083.
4 M. Smiglak, A. Metlen and R. D. Rogers, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2007, 40, 1182–1192.
3988 | RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 3981–3989
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013