Chemosensor with Remarkable Fluorescence
Spectrometrie de Masse de l′Universite´ Paul Sabatier et du CNRS
de Toulouse. Fast-atom bombardment (FAB > 0) spectra were
performed on a Nermag R10-10H spectrometer. A 9 kV xenon atom
beam was used to desorb samples from the 3-nitrobenzyl alcohol
matrix. Other spectra were performed on a triple quadrupole mass
spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer Sciex API 365) using the electrospray
ionization mode. The infusion rate was 5 µL/min. 1H and 13C NMR
spectra were performed on Bruker AC 200, AM 250, DPX 300,
and AMX 400 spectrometers. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were
referenced to external tetramethylsilane. For 2D NMR experiments,
the observation frequencies were in the range of 400.13 MHz for
1H and 100.62 MHz for 13C.
Electrochemical Studies. Voltammetric measurements were
carried out with a homemade potentiostat35 using the interrupt
method to minimize the uncompensated resistance (iR drop).
Experiments were performed at room temperature in an airtight
three-electrode cell connected to a vacuum/argon line. The reference
electrode consisted of a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) separated
from the solution by a bridge compartment filled with the same
solvent and supporting electrolyte solution. The counter electrode
was a platinum wire of ca. 1 cm2 apparent surface. The working
electrode was a Pt electrode (1 mm diameter). The supporting
electrolyte nBu4NBF4 (99%) (Fluka electrochemical grade) was
melted and dried under vacuum for 1 h. All solutions measured
were 1.0 × 10-3 M in organometallic complex and 0.1 M in
supporting electrolyte. The solutions were degassed by bubbling
experimental values of the variation of the chemical shifts,
respectively. The number of unknown parameters includes the
equilibrium constant for each species and their chemical shifts. This
number may seem important, but it must be underlined that a
simultaneous fitting on several distinct signals, 6 in our case, is
much more difficult to process than a fit on a single signal.
Optical Measurements. Apparatus. UV-vis absorption spectra
were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 8452A diode array spectro-
photometer. The absorption spectra did not vary over a period of
2 h. Cuvettes of 1 cm optical path length were used. Steady-state
fluorescence work was performed on a Photon Technology
International (PTI) Quanta Master 1 spectrofluorometer. All
fluorescence spectra were corrected. The fluorescence quantum yield
was determined relative to coumarin 6 in ethanol as the standard
(ΦF ) 0.78).36 The measurements were conducted at 20°C in a
thermostated cell.
Data Analysis. The absorption experimental data were processed
on a HP 9000 series 710 workstation. Absorbance, A, was related
to the concentration, Ci, using Beer-Lambert’s law, A ) l∑(ꢀiCi),
where ꢀi is the molar absorption coefficient of the species i and l
is the optical path length. The system of three equilibrium equations
with three independent variables was numerically solved by an
iterative method. The sum of the squares of the differences between
the experimental values and those of the numerical calculation was
minimized by a Powell nonlinear minimization algorithm. The
method has been extensively described in a previous paper.17
[Fe(C5H4CO(CHdCH)2C6H4NMe2)2] (3). A light-protected
mixture of Fe(C5H4COMe)2 (0.100 g, 0.37 × 10-3 mol), CHOCHd
CHC6H4NMe2 (0.130 g, 0.74×10-3mol), and 1 equiv of NaOH was
dissolved in ethanol (10 mL) and stirred for 4 h at room temperature.
The mixture was evaporated to dryness. The residue was purified
by column chromatography on dried silica (eluent ) 5:2 petroleum
ether/ethyl acetate), and the red phase was extracted with THF as
the eluent (3×). After evaporation of the solvent, the product was
washed with pentane (30 mL × 2) and dried to afford the desired
product as a deep orange powder in a 65% yield (m ) 0.140 g).
1H NMR (CD3CN, 293 K): δ 2.99 (s, 12H, Hp), 4.59 (br s, 4H,
3JHeHf ) 2.0 Hz, Hf), 4.84 (br s, 4H, 3JHeHf ) 2.0 Hz, He), 6.64 (d,
argon before the experiments. With the above reference, E1/2
)
0.45 V vs SCE was obtained for 1 mM ferrocene (estimated
experimental uncertainty of (10 mV). Cyclic voltammetry was
performed in the potential range of -2 to 2 V versus SCE scanning
from 0 toward 2 V/SCE for the oxidation studies (and from 0 toward
-2 V/SCE for the reduction studies) at 0.1 V s-1 at room
temperature. Before each measurement, the electrode was polished
with emery paper (Norton A621). To calculate the half wave
potential (E1/2), a quasi-steady-state behavior (at the Pt working
electrode, 1 mm in diameter) is obtained by the use of linear
voltammetry at 5 mV s-1. For cation detection experiments,
concentrated acetonitrile solutions of calcium triflate (0.3-10 equiv)
were syringed into the ferrocenyl solution under an argon atmo-
sphere, keeping the total volume of the electrochemical mixture
constant. The solution was immediately degassed and examined.
Proton NMR Titration Studies. Proton NMR titrations were
typically performed as follows. A solution (500 µL) of the receptor
3 in a deuterated solvent (10-2 M) was added (using a microsyringe)
into NMR tubes containing the appropriate quantities of solid Ca-
(CF3SO3)2 salt under an inert atmosphere, while the NMR spectrum
of the receptor was monitored. The samples of solid calcium were
prepared by evaporating the corresponding calculated volumes of
a calcium guest solution (10-2 M) in acetonitrile. Stability constants
were evaluated from titration data using the method indicated in
the main text.
3
3
4H, JHcHd ) 8.8 Hz, Hd), 6.67 (d, 2H, JHaHb ) 14.8 Hz, Ha),
6.88 (dd, 2H,3JHbHg ) 11.2 Hz, JHhHg ) 15.2 Hz, Hg), 7.02 (d,
3
2H, 3JHhHg ) 15.2 Hz, Hh), 7.36 (d, 4H,3JHcHd ) 8.8 Hz, Hc), 7.46
(dd, 2H, 3JHbHg ) 11.2 Hz, 3JHaHb ) 14.8 Hz, Hb). 13C {1H} NMR
(CD3CN, 293 K): δ 39.79 (CHp), 71.27 (CHe), 73.94 (CHf), 83.40
(Cipso-C5H4), 112.40 (CHd), 122.70 (CHg), 124.49 (Cipso-C),
124.49 (CHa), 129.06 (CHc), 142.61 (CHh), 142.65 (CHb), 151.57
(Cipso-N), 191.81 (CO). IR (CH3CN): 1522, 1559, 1570, 1604, 1645
(νCO), 2873-2998 (νCH). ESI-MS: 585.1 [M + H] +. Anal. Calcd
for 3, C36H36N2O2Fe: C, 73.97; H, 6.21; N, 4.79. Found: C, 73.72;
H, 6.19; N, 4.76.
Interaction of 3 with 2 equiv of Ca(CF3SO3)2. 1H NMR(CD3-
CN, 293 K): δ 2.99 (s, 12H, Hp), 4.80 (broad s, 4H, Hf), 5.00
Residual Error (Er) of the Curve-Fitting Model. The residual
error was calculated using the expression
(broad s, 4H, He), 6.55 (d, 4H, 3JHcHd ) 8.8 Hz, Hd), 6.55 (d, 2H,
3
3JHaHb ) 14.9 Hz, Ha), 6.78 (dd, 2H,3JHbHg ) 12.0 Hz, JHgHh
)
14.9 Hz, Hg), 7.08 (d, 2H, 3JHgHh ) 14.9 Hz, Hh), 7.22 (d, 4H,3JHcHd
) 8.8 Hz, Hc), 7.74 (dd, 2H, 3J HbHg ) 12.0 Hz, 3JHaHb ) 14.9 Hz,
Hb). 13C {1H} NMR (CD3CN, 293 K): δ 39.72 (CHp), 72.53
(CHe), 75.38 (CHf), 82.89 (Cipso-C5H4), 112.19 (CHd), 122.03
(CHg), 122.38 (CHa), 123.95 (Cipso-C), 129.87 (CHc), 147.10
(CHh), 148.76(CHb), 152.04 (Cipso-N), 194.05 (CO).
n
1
Er )
(ci - ei)2
∑
n - p - 1i)1
where n is the total number of points (6 × 10), p is the number of
unknown parameters (35 with five species, 21 when only three
species are taken into account), and ci and ei are the calculated and
[Fe(C5H4CO(CHdCH)2C6H4NHMe2)2] [BF4]2 (4). HBF4‚Et2O
(2 equiv) was slowly syringed into a stirred solution of 3 (0.08 ×
(35) Cassoux, P.; Dartiguepeyron, R.; de Montauzon, D.; Tommasino, J.
(36) Reynolds, G. A.; Drexhage, K. H. Opt. Commun. 1975, 13, 222-
B.; Fabre, P. L. Actual. Chim. 1994, 1, 49-55.
225.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 14, 2006 5701