124
E. Sauvageot et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 808 (2016) 122e127
secondary antibody (8
m
g/mL) in 100
m
L PBS. The plates were
L TMB solution,
L 2 N chlorhydric acid and the absorbance was
¼ 450 nm.
used to facilitate the comparison [10]. Briefly microtiter plates
coated with TNF- were incubated with TNFR-1 together with
racemic complexes. TNFR-1 binding was detected using anti-TNFR-
1 antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibody, by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm.
washed as before and incubated with 100
quenched with 100
measured at
m
a
m
l
2.5. Synergic tests procedure
Unsurprisingly, all the complexes demonstrated to be inhibitors,
going from really poor to highly potent ones (Table 2). Amongst
them, 10 complexes were able to inhibit the interaction at more
Microtiter plates were coated overnight with TNF-a (0.625 mg/
mL) in 100
200 L PBS/0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), blocked with 200
containing 1% BSA for 60 min and washed as before. Two of the test
compounds (100 M) in 25 L PBS containing 2% DMSO were
combined and added to the wells, following the same procedure,
4a, 1c, 3c (100 M) in 16.66 L PBS containing 2% DMSO were
combined and added to the wells. The microtiter plates were
incubated with shaking for 20 min. TNFR-1 (0.2 g/mL) in 50 L PBS
m
L PBS at 4 ꢀC. The wells were washed three times with
than 50% at a concentration of 50 mM, three complexes were even
m
m
L PBST
more potent and only let less than 40% residual binding. Indeed,
like protein-protein interactions were mostly occurring through
hydrophobic interactions, and as reported by Leung et al. [10], ar-
m
m
omatic ligands were expected to be able to interact with the
strands of the binding site of the dimeric form of TNF- . Such re-
sults suggested that the size of the complex and the nature of the
ancillary ligands are of utmost importance for the TNF- inhibitory
b-
m
m
a
m
m
a
was added to the wells and the plates were incubated for a further
120 min. The plates were washed as before and incubated for
120 min with TNFR-1 antibody (1:1000) in 100 mL PBST containing
1% BSA. The plates were washed three times with PBST and incu-
bated for 90 min with anti-rabbit cross adsorbed-peroxidase sec-
activity. More precisely, series a and c demonstrated to be more
potent than b and d, with average residual binding values of 56.2%
and 47.2% against 61.7% and 71.0% respectively. Lower inhibitory
activities were observed with the piq ligands compared to the ppy
ones. Such result might be explained by the steric hindrance of the
isoquinoline moiety. Therefore, in our study, the best C^N ligand
was bzq, slightly better than ppy ligand previously reported by
Leung et al. [10] N^N ligands were also crucial for the interactions
and small changes could have terrible impact. For example, the
addition of methyl substituents could greatly increase the biolog-
ical properties, as shown by going from complex 3a to 4a or 5a. In
an overall manner, polyaromatic substituents are more effective
(phen > bpy and dpa). This trend might be also correlated with the
planarity of the N^N ligands. A negative charge on the N^N ligand
appeared to be unfavourable (dpa compared to dpa-). It is note-
worthy that acac ligands displayed interesting biological proper-
ondary antibody (8
as before and incubated with 100
100 L 2 N chlorhydric acid and the absorbance was measured at
¼ 450 nm.
mg/mL) in 100
mL PBS. The plates were washed
mL TMB solution, quenched with
m
l
2.6. Blue native PAGE analysis of TNF-ae1c interaction
A solution of TNF-
a (20 mM) in presence or absence of 1c
(100 M) was analyzed using Blue-Native PAGE in 12% Poly-
m
acrylamide resolving gel following reported procedures [15].
3. Results and discussion
ties, despite giving neutral iridium(III) complexes. As
consequence, the three best complexes were 1c, 3c and 4a, with
IC50 values of 25 16 M, 34 M and 48 M, respectively.
a
Only one iridium cationic complex has been previously
m
3
m
7 m
described for TNF-
a
inhibition [10]. In this work, we prepared a
In a second series of experiments, a 1/1 mixture of two different
complexes 4a, 1c or 3c was used in the ELISA tests. Surprisingly, all
reactions demonstrated an increased inhibitory activity going from
9% to 19%, but yet unexplained (Fig. 2). The best synergic effect was
observed when the two complexes 3c and 4a where mixed. A 1/1/1
mixture of the three complexes proved also to be more efficient
that one complex alone, but to a lesser extent than the latter one.
Interestingly, this effect cannot simply be attributed to ligand ex-
change since none were observed as demonstrated by NMR cor-
relation studies of the different mixtures (see E.S.I.).
Finally, the influence of the nature of the light was evaluated in
ELISA tests with our three best complexes 1c, 3c and 4a (Fig. 3 up).
In the absence of light, the complexes were less potent. Interest-
ingly, the blue light induced an increase in the inhibitory activity
from 6% to 15%, and the white light was the most effective with an
increase up to 21%. In fact, all theses three complexes, including
either a ppy and/or bzq ligand, have previously demonstrated to
series of 51 racemic iridium(III) complexes, both neutral and
cationic, in order to give a good overview of the structure-function
relationships (Table 1).
Such complexes can be easily obtained with high isolated yields
ranging from 47 to 99%, via a two steps synthesis following known
procedures (see Scheme 1 and E.S.I) [13,16]. Their structures were
assessed by comparison with known X-ray structure of previously
published iridium complexes and by NMR (see E.S.I.). Amongst
them, 21 were never previously chemically synthesized and char-
acterized (in italics in the table). In our study, we thus decided to
select four cyclometalated C^N ligands 2-phenylpyridine (ppy) a, 1-
phenylpyrazole (ppz) b, 7,8-benzoquinoline (bzq)
c and 1-
phenylisoquinoline (piq) d and eleven ancillary N^N ligands 2,20-
bipyridine (bpy) 1 and its dimethyl analogue (4-Me-bpy) 2, 1,10-
phenanthroline (phen) 3, 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (neo)
4, 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline (tphen) 5, 2,20-dipyr-
idylmethane (dpm) 6, 2,20-dipyridylamine (dpa) 7 and its 3-, 4- and
5-dimethyl analogues, (3-Me-dpa) 8, (4-Me-dpa) 9 and (5-Me-dpa)
10 respectively, or N-methyl derivative (N-Me-dpa) 11. Combina-
tion of these C^N and N^N ligands led to a series of 42 cationic
complexes (C^N ¼ a-d, N^N ¼ 1e11, see Table 1). In addition, three
anionic ligands namely the anion of dpa (dpa-) 12, the anion of the
dibenzoylmethanate (dbm) 13 and the acetylacetonate (acac) 14
allowed us to obtain 9 neutral complexes (C^N ¼ a-d, N^N ¼ 12,
O^O ¼ 13e14, see Table 1).
present a maximum of absorption which can be ascribed to a
ligand-centred (LC) transition, in the UV region as well as a weak
and broad band of absorption at 425 nm, that corresponds to a d
* metal-to-ligand charge transfer ([1]MLCT) (Fig. 3 bottom) [13].
pep*
p
-
p
They also proved to own photoredox capacities that might be at the
origin of such increase activities. Such hypothesis was strengthened
by the observed lower inhibitory activities with ppz-complexes
(series b), which do not present any maximum of absorption in
the visible region. Therefore the iridium complex might interact
with the protein (and some amino acids) via a radical process and
then might be not the same at the end of the irradiation period.
However no change was observed using mass spectrometry of the
protein in the presence of such complex nor of the iridium complex
With these complexes in hands, we investigated their capacity
in inhibiting the TNF-a/TNF Receptor-1 interaction, using an ELISA
experiment to determine the half-maximal inhibitory concentra-
tion (IC50) values. Similar conditions than previously reported were