C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
is methodological, where we use elastomer stamps to pick-and-
place self-organized organic cables into devices. It would have been
difficult to study the former without the latter, as it would be
difficult to exploit the latter without a material like 1. This method
is broadly applicable in materials chemistry for testing the properties
of individual, self-assembled organic nanostructures and the
elucidation of intrinsic properties.
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge support from the Nano-
scale Science and Engineering Initiative of the NSF under Award
Number CHE-0117752 and by the New York State Office of
Science, Technology, and Academic Research (NYSTAR); the
DOE, Nanoscience Initiative (NSET#04ER46118); the NSF CA-
REER award (#DMR-02-37860). We thank the MRSEC Program
of the NSF under Award Number DMR-0213574 and by the New
York State Office of Science, Technology and Academic Research
(NYSTAR). The work at Brookhaven National Laboratory was
supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. DOE. This
manuscript has been authored by Brookhaven Science Associates,
LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. DOE.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic of a FET from an isolated fiber. (B) Micrograph
of a device formed from an isolated fiber that spans Au (200 nm thick) on
Cr (5 nm thick) electrodes. The silicon wafer forms a back gate for the
device. (C) Transfer characteristics (VDS ) -50 V) and (D) transistor output.
VG ) 0 and -24 V in 4 V steps. The electrical characteristics are for the
device pictured in (B).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details for
synthesis, structure determination, and electrical measurements, and a
movie showing the self-assembled fiber growth. This material is
sheets because the molecules are substituted to be amphiphilic.
These sheets then roll themselves into a hollow helix. In our present
case, the structure is much different: the columns are solid rods
rather than hollow tubes. The oval cross section of the columns
causes them to pack into a rectangular lattice, as shown in Figure
2D,E. By aligning the fibers in devices, we can probe the electrical
conductivity along the one-dimensional stacks where they should
be most highly conductive.15,16
We developed a method to manipulate, align, and transfer isolated
fibers into transistor devices using elastomer stamps. This technique
follows those developed for carbon nanotubes6,17 and nanowires.18,19
First, we grow a mat of nanofibers from dodecane solution (shown
in Figure 1B) by slow evaporation of the solvent. An elastomer
stamp made from polydimethoxysilane (PDMS) is gently pressed
into the mat of fibers. Remarkably only a few fibers transfer to the
stamp. Pressing the “loaded” stamp onto a substrate or device test
structure then transfers this fiber.
We tested two methods for making devices out of these fibers.
One was to transfer the fibers onto prefabricated electrodes, and
another was to transfer the fiber to a clean wafer and then evaporate
electrodes onto them through a shadow mask (100 µm × 100 µm
squares separated by 5 µm). We found better electrical character-
istics when the fibers were first transferred and the electrodes
subsequently deposited.
A device constructed on an individual fiber and its electrical
characteristics are shown in Figure 3. The material behaves as a
p-type, hole-transporting semiconductor. The length of the fiber
spanning the Au/Cr electrodes is 6.1 µm, and its width is ∼250
nm. The carrier mobility in these fibers is estimated to be ∼0.02
cm2/V‚s.20 These values are quite good compared to other columnar
materials1,21,22 but are still a lower limit on the values that are
possible with these materials. The nonlinear current voltage curves
at low VD in Figure 3D indicate they are limited by contact
resistance.23,24 Moreover, the drain current in the gate sweep (Figure
3C) is greater than that in the corresponding source-drain sweep
(Figure 3D), indicating there is a measurable amount of carrier
trapping.25,26 We tested around a 100 devices made from fibers and
found that the mobility varied sample to sample, ranging between
10-4 and g10-2 cm2/V‚s. This variation is likely due to the
differences in morphology of individual fibers (as seen in Figure
1B) and changes in the physical contact to each of the fibers.
This study describes two new items: one is material, a new set
of molecules that self-organize into molecular cables, and the other
References
(1) Xiao, S.; Myers, M.; Miao, Q.; Sanaur, S.; Pang, K.; Steigerwald, M. L.;
Nuckolls, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7390-7394.
(2) Lovinger, A. J.; Nuckolls, C.; Katz, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
264-268.
(3) Hill, J. P.; Jin, W.; Kosaka, A.; Fukushima, T.; Ichihara, H.; Shimomura,
T.; Ito, K.; Hashizume, T.; Ishii, N.; Aida, T. Science 2004, 304, 1481-
1483.
(4) Kato, T.; Mizoshita, N.; Moriyama, M.; Kitamura, T. Top. Curr. Chem.
2005, 256, 219-236.
(5) Bushey, M. L.; Nguyen, T.-Q.; Zhang, W.; Horoszewski, D.; Nuckolls,
C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5446-5453.
(6) Huang, X. M. H.; Caldwell, R.; Huang, L.; Jun, S. C.; Huang, M.; Sfeir,
M. Y.; O’Brien, S. P.; Hone, J. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1515-1518.
(7) Dimitrakopoulos, C. D.; Malenfant, P. R. L. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 99-117.
(8) Horowitz, G. AdV. Mater. 1998, 10, 365-377.
(9) Garnier, F. Chem. Phys. 1998, 227, 253-262.
(10) Wang, Z.; Doetz, F.; Enkelmann, V.; Muellen, K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 1247-1250.
(11) Wurthner, F. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1564-1579.
(12) A full pattern fit was used to refine the unit cell parameters, giving an
overall agreement factor Rwp ) 0.17% (program “Winprep” 2005-02-
14; diffraction pattern modifier by Kenny Stahl, Department of Chemistry,
Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lynby, Denmark; kenny@
kemi.dtu.dk). See the Supporting Information.
(13) Cavallini, M.; Stoliar, P.; Moulin, J.-F.; Surin, M.; Leclere, P.; Lazzaroni,
R.; Breiby, D. W.; Andreasen, J. W.; Nielsen, M. M.; Sonar, P.; Grimsdale,
A. C.; Mullen, K.; Biscarini, F. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2422-2425.
(14) Kastler, M.; Pisula, W.; Wasserfallen, D.; Pakula, T.; Muellen, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4286-4296.
(15) Boden, N.; Bushby, R. J.; Lozman, O. R. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2003,
400, 105-113.
(16) Piris, J.; Debije, M. G.; Stutzmann, N.; van de Craats, A. M.; Watson,
M. D.; Muellen, K.; Warman, J. M. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 1736-1740.
(17) Meitl, M. A.; Zhou, Y.; Gaur, A.; Jeon, S.; Usrey, M. L.; Strano, M. S.;
Rogers, J. A. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1643-1647.
(18) Sun, Y.; Rogers, J. A. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1953-1959.
(19) Menard, E.; Lee, K. J.; Khang, D.-Y.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Rogers, J. A. Appl.
Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 5398-5400.
1/2
(20) The mobility is calculated by plotting |ID| with |VG| and using the
equation: ID ) (W‚Ci/2‚L)(VG - V0)2; W is the width and L is the length;
the source-drain voltage is fixed at -50 V (in the saturation regime of
the I-V curves in Figure 3D). For the 100 nm SiO2 layer, Ci ) 33 nF/cm2.
(21) van de Craats, A. M.; Warman, J. M.; Fechtenkotter, A.; Brand, J. D.;
Harbison, M. A.; Mullen, K. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11, 1469-1472.
(22) Pisula, W.; Menon, A.; Stepputat, M.; Lieberwirth, I.; Kolb, U.; Tracz, A.;
Sirringhaus, H.; Pakula, T.; Muellen, K. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 684-689.
(23) Pesavento, P. V.; Chesterfield, R. J.; Newman, C. R.; Frisbie, C. D. J.
Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 7312-7324.
(24) Blanchet, G. B.; Fincher, C. R.; Lefenfeld, M.; Rogers, J. A. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2004, 84, 296-298.
(25) Lang, D. V.; Chi, X.; Siegrist, T.; Sergent, A. M.; Ramirez, A. P. Phys.
ReV. Lett. 2004, 93, 076601.
(26) Chang, J. B.; Subramanian, V. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 233513.
JA0642360
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 33, 2006 10701