5176
Organometallics 2006, 25, 5176-5179
The Use of Phosphirenes as Conjugating Spacers in Polythiophene
Chains
Ngoc Hoa Tran Huy,*,† Emilie Perrier,† Louis Ricard,† and Franc¸ois Mathey*,‡
Laboratoire “He´te´roe´le´ments et Coordination” UMR CNRS 7653, DCPH, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128
Palaiseau Cedex, France, and UCR-CNRS Joint Research Chemistry Laboratory, Department of
Chemistry, UniVersity of California, RiVerside, California 92521-0403
ReceiVed July 27, 2006
Summary: A series of thienyl-substituted phosphirene P-W(CO)5
complexes were synthesized by reaction of the transient terminal
phosphinidene complex [Ph-P-W(CO)5] with the appropriate
thienyl-substituted alkynes. The X-ray structural study of these
complexes shows coplanar thiophene and phosphirene rings,
suggesting a good inter-ring conjugation. A combined 13C
NMR-NBO analysis indicates that the CdC double bond of
the phosphirene ring is highly polarizable. UV spectra show a
red-shift of the absorption when conVerting the alkynes into the
phosphirenes. CV data are also giVen.
the chain.4 Thus, a conjugating spacer within a polythiophene
chain must induce a weakening of the thiophene aromaticity,
while favoring the highest possible conjugation between the
thiophene units. In this work, we demonstrate that the phos-
phirene ring meets all the criteria (accessibility, stability, and
conjugating properties) for its use as a conjugating spacer within
a polythiophene chain.
Results and Discussion
We first decided to synthesize a 2,3-bis(2-thienyl)phosphirene
complex using the classical phosphinidene approach (eq 1).5
Introduction
The incorporation of phosphorus centers within the backbone
of π-conjugated materials for molecular electronics and opto-
electronics has recently attracted a lot of attention.1 Indeed,
phosphorus allows an easy tuning of the electronic properties
of the materials by modification of the chemical environment
of the heteroatom (oxidation, quaternization, complexation).
When conceiving these new P-containing materials, the ease
of synthesis and the stability of the products are two crucial
criteria that must never be overlooked. For example, R-con-
nected polyphospholes are difficult to synthesize and seem to
display some instability above four phosphole units.2 This is
the reason mixed phosphole-thiophene chains are, by far, the
most studied oligomers in this category.3 From the electronic
standpoint, several theoretical studies on polyheterole chains
have clearly shown that there is a competition between the
aromaticity of the heterole and the desirable delocalization along
The reaction runs smoothly and produces complex 1, whose
X-ray crystal structure is shown in Figure 1. The thiophene and
phosphirene rings of 1 are coplanar with sulfur atoms facing
each other on the concave side of the chain. The thiophene-
phosphirene interplane angles are 4.82(0.23)° and 6.60(0.24)°.
Together with the coplanarity of the rings, the lengthening of
the endo C3-S1 by comparison with the exo C6-S1 bond
suggests that a significant interaction exists between the
phosphirene and thiophene π-systems.
To get more data and further establish the necessary synthetic
bases for our study of the phosphirene-thiophene chains, it was
also necessary to prepare phosphirene-thiophene-phosphirene
units. A positive result was not granted because it had been
previously shown that the reaction of terminal phosphinidene
complexes with 1,3-diynes can lead either to 2,2′-biphosphirenes
as expected6 or to alkynyl-substituted 1,2-diphosphetenes by
insertion of the second phosphinidene unit into the ring of the
initially formed 2-alkynylphosphirene.7 Thus we allowed our
† Laboratoire “He´te´roe´le´ments et Coordination” UMR CNRS 7653.
‡ University of California.
(1) Mathey, F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1578. Jin, Z.; Lucht, B.
L. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653, 167. Wright, V.; Gates, D. P. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2389. Smith, R. C.; Protasiewicz, J. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2268. Hissler, M.; Lescop, C.; Re´au, R. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 2482. Gates, D. P. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005,
250, 107. Hissler, M.; Dyer, P. W.; Re´au, R. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 250,
127.
(2) Deschamps, E.; Ricard, L.; Mathey, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1994, 33, 1158.
(3) Be´vierre, M.-O.; Mercier, F.; Ricard, L.; Mathey, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 655. Be´vierre, M.-O.; Mercier, F.; Mathey, F.;
Jutand, A.; Amatore, C. New J. Chem. 1991, 15, 545. Hay, C.; Fischmeister,
C.; Hissler, M.; Toupet, L.; Re´au, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
1812. Hay, C.; Fave, C.; Hissler, M.; Rault-Berthelot, J.; Re´au, R. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 3467. Fave, C.; Cho, T.-Y.; Hissler, M.; Chen, C.-W.; Luh,
T.-Y.; Wu, C.-C.; Re´au, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9254. Baum-
gartner, T.; Neumann, T.; Wirges, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
6197. Baumgartner, T.; Bergmans, W.; Ka´rpa´ti, T.; Neumann, T.; Nieger,
M.; Nyula´szi, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4687. Neumann, T.; Dienes, Y.;
Baumgartner, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 495. Baumgartner, T.; Wilk, W. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 503. Su, H.-C.; Fadhel, O.; Yang, C.-J.; Cho, T.-Y.; Fave,
C.; Hissler, M.; Wu, C.-C.; Re´au, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 983.
(4) Salzner, U.; Lagowski, J. B.; Pickup, P. G.; Poirier, R. A. Synth.
Met. 1998, 96, 177. Delaere, D.; Nguyen, M. T.; Vanquickenborne, L. G.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 1522. Ma, J.; Li, S.; Jiang, Y.
Macromolecules 2002, 35, 1109.
(5) Marinetti, A.; Mathey, F.; Fischer, J.; Mitschler, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1982, 104, 4484. Marinetti, A.; Mathey, F.; Fischer, J.; Mitschler, A.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 45.
(6) Tran Huy, N. H.; Ricard, L.; Mathey, F. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1999, 2409.
(7) Tran Huy, N. H.; Ricard, L.; Mathey, F. Organometallics 1997, 16,
4501. Wang, B.; Nguyen, K. A.; Srinivas, G. N.; Watkins, C. L.; Menzer,
S.; Spek, A. L.; Lammertsma, K. Organometallics 1999, 18, 796.
10.1021/om060675w CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 09/06/2006