2-position would be formed via a malonic radical cyclization
of 2. The choice of this disconnection was inspired by the
seminal work of Snider4 and others.5
Table 1. Cyclizations of Malonyl Radicals to Indoles
Notwithstanding the excellent contributions of Chuang and
co-workers,5 who have demonstrated the viability of malonic
radical additions to indoles, a survey of the literature revealed
that the cyclization of malonic radicals onto aromatics and
especially heteroaromatics is an underdeveloped and under-
exploited synthetic method. In this paper, we report an
expansion of the scope of this reaction with the significant
adVance that indolines (rather than indoles) may be em-
ployed as substrates since they are oxidized to indoles under
the radical cyclization conditions.
These Mn(OAc)3-mediated cyclizations are postulated6 to
proceed through the oxidation of a malonic enolate derived
from 3 to yield a malonic radical 4 (Scheme 2). Cyclization
Scheme 2. Mechanism of Malonic Radical Cyclizations
onto the 2-position of an indole or pyrrole yields a resonance
stabilized radical 5 which may undergo further oxidation to
carbonium ion 6. Aromatization via proton loss gives the
product 7.
A variety of commercially available indoles and pyrroles
were acylated or alkylated with malonyl-containing chains
and subjected to oxidative cyclization with Mn(OAc)3 in
methanol. Table 1 shows the oxidative radical cyclization
of N-acyl indoles 8-13 and the N-alkyl derivative 14. While
methanol was our preferred solvent for this transformation,
acetic acid, the most common solvent for Mn(OAc)3
chemistry, also yielded satisfactory results. It is likely that
sensitive functionality in more complicated substrates will
be more tolerant of methanol than acetic acid.
The yields in Table 1 are uniformly good with the
exception of the indole-3-carboxaldehyde 13, which decom-
posed under the reaction conditions with only trace amounts
of 13 recovered. This surprised us since we were expecting
the additional conjugation to make this substrate a better
radical acceptor. Substitution at the indole 3-position did not
appear to be a problem. In fact, the improved yield is
consistent with the expected improved ease of formation of
the radical of type 5 and subsequent oxidation of this radical
by Mn(OAc)3.3a The N-alkyl substrate 14 was also a willing
participant in the radical cyclization yielding 21 in 67% yield.
Compounds such as 14, however, were more tedious to
prepare than the N-acyl counterparts.
(2) (a) Tronocarpine: Kam, T.-S.; Sim, K.-M.; Lim, T.-M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 2733. (b) Mersicarpine: Kam, T.-S.; Subramaniam, G.; Lim,
K.-H.; Choo, Y.-M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5995. (c) Rhazinal: Kam,
T.-S.; Tee, Y.-M.; Subramaniam, G. Nat. Prod. Lett. 1998, 12, 307.
(3) Banwell, M. G.; Edwards, A. J.; Jolliffe, K. A.; Smith, J. A.; Hamel,
E.; Verdier-Pinard, P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 296
(4) For comprehensive reviews of Mn(OAc)3 chemistry, see: (a) Snider,
B. B. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 339. (b) Snider, Barry B. Manganese(III)-based
oxidative free-radical cyclizations. In Transition Metals for Organic
Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Beller, M., Bolm, C., Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH
& Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; Vol. 1, pp 483-490.
(5) (a) Tsai, A.-I.; Lin, C.-H.; Chuang, C. P. Heterocycles 2005, 65, 2381.
(b) Chuang, C. P.; Wang, S. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1283. (c) Artis
D. R.; Cho I.-S.; Muchowski, J. M. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 1838.
(6) (a) Fristad, W. E.; Peterson, J. R. J. Org. Chem. l985, 50, 10. (b)
Fristad, W. E.; Hershberger, S. S. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1026. (c) Fristad,
W. E.; Peterson, J. R.; Ernst, A. B. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 3143. (d) Yang,
F. Z.; Trost, M. K.; Fristad, W. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 1493.
The analogous cyclizations onto pyrroles also proceeded
as expected. Substrates 22-24 were prepared and subjected
to typical cyclization conditions. Cyclization of the N-alkyl
4562
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 20, 2006