necessary in 1,2-dichloroethane was presumed to be due to
low solubility of PtCl4 (Table 1, entry 1). This problem was
Scheme 1. Cyclization Reactions of the Tosylamide 1 System
Table 1. Cyclization Reactions Catalyzed by PtCl4 or PtCl2
entry
Pt catalyst
solvent
time (h)
yield (%)
1
2
3b
4
5
6
7b
PtCl4
PtCl4
PtCl4
PtCl4
PtCl2
PtCl2
PtCl2
ClCH2CH2Cl
EtOH
EtOH
tert-BuOH
ClCH2CH2Cl
EtOH
16
9
1
24
24
24
24
70
65
79
2 (58)a
10 (76)a
21 (67)a
40 (48)a
catalyzed by platinum catalyst, recently reported to be an
activator of π-bonds (Scheme 1).6,7
Disappointingly, it was found that the PtCl4-catalyzed
cyclization reaction can only be applied to a limited number
of substrates, due to the instability of the enamine moiety
of the products. However, in the process of surveying new
substrates and catalyst systems, we unexpectedly found that
homopropargyl azide derivatives could be converted to
pyrrole rings in the presence of catalytic amounts of PtCl4,
in 70% yield (Scheme 2). While we were working on
EtOH
a The numbers in parentheses are yields of recovered 3. b The reactions
were started after stirring the platinum catalyst in ethanol for 1 h at 50 °C.
resolved by changing the solvent to ethanol (Table 1, entry
2). Surprisingly, the reaction rate was much improved by
stirring the solution of PtCl4 in ethanol for 1 h at 50 °C before
adding the substrate (Table 1, entry 2 vs 3). The requirement
of the induction period for obtaining higher catalytic activities
suggested the possibility that initially added PtCl4 is trans-
formed to other active species.
Scheme 2. PtCl4-Catalyzed Cyclization Reaction of
Homopropargyl Azide Derivatives
In 1974, Hass and Hauthal reported that ethanol was
oxidized by PtCl4 to produce PtCl2, acetaldehyde, and
hydrogen chloride.10 Noting from our results that tert-butanol
was not an effective solvent (Table 1, entry 4), we speculated
that perhaps the active species in ethanol is PtCl2, which
could be generated in situ. However, when the reaction was
performed in the presence of commercially available PtCl2,
completely different results were obtained than from the
reaction with PtCl4. Namely, the reaction rates were much
slower in either dichloroethane or ethanol, and the rates could
not be improved, even with an induction period (as in entry
3). Furthermore, the reaction did not proceed to completion
even after 24 h (Table 1, entries 5, 6, and 7). From these
results, it is obvious that PtCl4 in ethanol is being converted
into a species other than PtCl2. However, the true active
species cannot be identified at the present time. On the other
hand, since it is difficult to imagine that Pt(IV) could be
reduced to Pt(II) in dichloroethane, the structure of the
catalyst may vary depending upon the solvent used.
optimizing our reaction conditions, Toste’s research group
published a paper describing nearly identical reactions,
including the conversion of homopropargyl azide derivatives
to substituted pyrroles in the presence of catalytic amounts
of (dppm)Au2Cl2 and AgSbF6 in dichloromethane under mild
conditions.8 Toste’s group proposed a reaction mechanism
in which gold(I) induces activation of the alkyne toward
nucleophilic addition of the proximal nitrogen atom of the
azide. Herein, we describe a simpler catalytic system for
efficient pyrroles synthesis as Toste’s reaction.9
Optimization of the Pt-catalyzed reactions began with the
selection of the solvent. The long reaction time (16 h)
(6) Pt(II) catalyst: (a) Nakamura, I.; Bajracharya, G. B.; Wu, H.; Oishi,
K.; Mizushima, Y.; Gridnev, I. D.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 15423-15430. (b) Harrison, T. J.; Dake, G. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
5023-5026. (c) Fu¨rstner, A.; Davies, P. W.; Gress, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 8244-8245. (d) Nakamura, I.; Mizushima, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15022-15023. (e) Fu¨rstner, A.; Davies, P.
W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15024-15025. (f) Oh, C. H.; Reddy, V.
R.; Kim, A.; Rhim, C. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5307-5310.
(7) Pt(IV) catalyst: (a) Pastine, S. J.; Youn, S. W.; Sames, D. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 1055-1058. (b) Pastine, S. J.; Sames, D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4053-
4055. (c) Pastine, S. J.; Youn, S. W.; Sames, D. Tetrahedron 2003, 59,
8859-8868.
(9) For recent examples on the pyrrole synthesis, see: (a) Kamijo, S.;
Kanazawa, C.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9260-9266.
(b) Lu, L.; Chen, G.; Ma, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 835-838. (c) Binder, J. T.;
Kirsch, S. F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2151-2153. (d) Harrison, T. J.; Kozak, J.
A.; Corbella-Pane´, M.; Dake, G. R. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4525-4529
and references cited therein. (e) Freifeld, I.; Shojaei, H.; Langer, P. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 4965-4968. (f) Seregin, I. V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 12050-12051. (g) Wan, X.; Xing, D.; Fang, Z.; Li, B.;
Zhao, F.; Zhang, K.; Yang, L.; Shi, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12046-
12047.
(10) (a) Hass, D.; Hauthal, T. Z. Chem. 1975, 15, 33-34. (b) Hass, D.;
Hauthal, T. Z. Chem. 1975, 15, 65-66. (c) Labinger, J. A.; Herring, A.
M.; Lyon, D. K.; Luinstra, G. A.; Bercaw, J. E. Organometallics 1993, 12,
895-905.
(8) Gorin, D. J.; Davis, N. R.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 11260-11261.
5350
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 23, 2006