screening has ascribed potent anti-HIV and cancer chemo-
preventive properties to this compound and close natural
relatives.6a,7
PPAPs have stimulated much synthetic activity; several
groups have described progress toward specific members of
the PPAP family,8 but only very recently has 1 succumbed
to total synthesis by the groups of Shibasaki9 and Danishef-
sky.10
bridgehead substituent. Direct substitution at the vinylic
position (C-3) by metalation also appeared viable.14 Here
we present preliminary results which serve to validate this
strategy and which enable a very concise synthesis of 3
(Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
The idea of constructing either naturally occurring PPAPs
or unnatural derivatives, by appending substituents to a
common [3.3.1]-trione core system, is an attractive one in
terms of accessing diverse structures for probing the SAR
in these systems. In this context, we noted the very rapid
access to an appropriate trione, described by Spessard and
Stoltz in their elegant approach to garsubellin A (Scheme
1).11
Scheme 1
They accomplished diastereoselective (at C-7) conversion
of enol silane 4 into the bridged trione 5 by reaction with
malonyl dichloride, in a modification of a procedure origi-
nally described by Effenburger and co-workers.12 The yield
of 5 was modest, but the ketone corresponding to 4 could
also be recovered. Unfortunately, enol derivatives having
additional R- and R′-substituents, destined to emerge as the
C-1 and C-5 bridgehead groups in 5, were even less
satisfactory participants in the cyclization.
On the basis of our successful bridgehead lithiation-
substitution results on related [3.3.1] systems,13 we antici-
pated adopting this method for appending appropriate
substituents onto a core structure 5 at either (or both)
As installation of a substituent at the very hindered C-1
position of 5 was considered an extreme test of our strategy,15
we instead opted to focus on substitution reactions at C-3
and C-5 of a core trione (or derivative thereof). With
clusianone in mind as the ultimate target, we prepared an
enol derivative incorporating the required C-1 prenyl sub-
stituent.
Prenylation of the known vinylogous ester 6 gave 7,16
which was then reacted with MeLi and hydrolyzed under
mildly acidic conditions to give enone 8. Copper-catalyzed
Grignard addition to this tetrasubstituted system proved more
effective than the use of stoichiometric cuprate reagents and
provided the ketone product as a mixture of diastereoisomers
9 and 10, with the former predominating. A regioisomeric
mixture of enol ethers 11 and 12 was then easily prepared
using established conditions.17
(6) (a) Piccinelli, A. L.; Cuesta-Rubio, O.; Chica, M. B.; Mahmood, N.;
Pagano, B.; Pavone, M.; Barone, V.; Rastrelli, L. Tetrahedron 2005, 61,
8206-8211. (b) Delle Monache, F.; Delle Monache, G.; Gacs-Baits, E.
Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 2003-2005.
(7) Ito, C.; Itoigawa, M.; Miyamoto, Y.; Onoda, S.; Sundar Rao, K.;
Mukainaka, T.; Tokuda, H.; Nishino, H.; Furukawa, H. J. Nat. Prod. 2003,
66, 206-209.
(8) For full listings of previous efforts, see refs 9 and 10 and also: (a)
Mehta, G.; Bera, M. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 689-692. (b) Kraus,
G. A.; Jeon, I. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 2111-2116. (c) Lavigne, R. M. A.;
Riou, M.; Girardin, M.; Morency, L.; Barriault, L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5921-
5923.
Our explorations of the Effenburger-type cyclization
indicated rather similar effectiveness of methyl enol ethers
such as 11/12 and the corresponding enol silanes (OTBS),
and either regioisomer appears to participate in the process.
(9) Kuramochi, A.; Usuda, H.; Yamatsugu, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14200-14201.
(14) Miyata, O.; Schmidt, R. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 1793-1796.
(15) The Danishefsky Garsubellin A synthesis features bridgehead
substitution at this position, which proved less than trivial, due to a 25-
36% yield in the key bridgehead iodination process (via lithiation-
silylation).
(16) Majetich, G.; Hull, K.; Casares, A. M.; Khetani, V. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 3958-3973.
(17) Heiszwolf, G. J.; Kloosterziel, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1966, 51.
(10) Siegal, D. R.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
1048-1049.
(11) Spessard, S. J.; Stoltz, B. M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1943-1946.
(12) Scho¨nwa¨lder, K.-H.; Kollatt, P.; Stezowski, J. J.; Effenburger, F.
Chem. Ber. 1984, 117, 3280-3296.
(13) Giblin, G. M. P.; Kirk, D. T.; Mitchell, L.; Simpkins, N. S. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 1673-1675.
5284
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 23, 2006