2700
P. Majewska et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 17 (2006) 2697–2701
from commercial suppliers: Sigma, Aldrich, Fluka, POCh
and used without further purification.
127.81, 128.41, 128.49, 128.63, 132.64, 132.71, 132.92,
133.48 (aromatic carbons), 172.00 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, C@O).
3.3.2. Mixture of (RP,S)- and (SP,R)-enantiomers. 31P
NMR d (ppm) 34.52; 1H NMR: d (ppm): 0.83 (t,
J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.25 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H,
OCH2CH3), 1.50–1.58 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 2.27 (dt,
J = 2.2 Hz, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, C(O)CH2), 4.00–4.07 (m, 2H,
OCH2), 6.32 (d, J = 10.6 Hz, 1H, CHP), 7.25–7.72 (m,
10H, aromatic protons); 13C NMR d (ppm): 13.63
(CH2CH2CH3), 16.58 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, OCH2CH3), 18.45
(CH2CH2CH3), 36.17 (C(O)CH2), 61.91 (d, J = 6.6 Hz,
OCH2), 72.35 (d, J = 119.1 Hz, CHP), 127.99, 128.02,
128.41 (2C), 128.49, 128.62, 132.65, 132.71, 133.90,
133.37 (aromatic carbons), 171.94 (d, J = 7.5, C@O).
3.2. Synthesis of ethyl hydroxy(phenyl)methane-
(P-phenyl)phosphinate 1
Aluminum oxide (5 g) was mixed with 5 g of potassium
fluoride and powdered in a grinder. Then 20 mmol of ethyl
phenylphosphinate and 20 mmol of the acetic aldehyde was
added into this mixture and left at room temperature for
48 h. After this time, the mixture was eluted by dichloro-
methane. The desired compound 1 was purified by gradient
column chromatography on silica gel using dichlorometh-
ane/ethyl acetate (5:3 v/v) as eluent; Rf (1) = 0.29. This
procedure resulted in the mixture of diastereoisomers
obtained in 1:1 molar ratio with 51% yield.
3.4. Synthesis of Mosher esters
3.2.1. Mixture of (RP,R)- and (SP,S)-isomers. 31P NMR d
(ppm): 39.56; H NMR: d (ppm) 1.32 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H,
OCH3), 3.93–4.18 (m, 2H, OCH2), 5.16 (d, J = 10.4 Hz,
1H, CHP), 7.20–7.64 (m, 10H, aromatic protons); 13C
NMR d (ppm): 16.71 (d, J = 6.1, CH3), 62.09 (OCH2),
73.41 (d, J = 111.3, CHP), 127.18, 127.22, 127.92 (d,
J = 3.1), 128.08, 128.10, 128.25, 132.68 (d, J = 2.2),
132.77, 133.06, 136.58 (aromatic carbons).
Compound 1 of various stereomeric compositions was
acylated according to the literature:13 0.10 mmol of 1 was
dissolved in the mixture composed of dry dichloromethane
(300 ll) and dry pyridine (300 ll), followed by the addition
of 0.14 mmol of (S)-(+)MTPA-Cl. The mixture was left for
3 days at room temperature. An excess of 3-dimethyl-
amino-1-propylamine (0.20 mmol) was then added and
after 5 min at room temperature, the mixture was diluted
with diethyl ether (10 ml), washed by cold dilute HCl
(10 ml) and water (10 ml), and dried over anhydrous mag-
nesium sulfate. After filtration of the drying agent, ether
was evaporated, compound 3 was purified by means of
HPLC (C-18 column; gradient: from 60% of acetonitrile
in water to 100% of acetonitrile; retention time of 3:
13.6 min).
1
3.2.2. Mixture of (RP,S) and (SP,R) isomers. 31P NMR d
1
(ppm): 38.00; H NMR: d (ppm): 1.27 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H,
CH3 ), 3.93–4.18 (m, 2H, OCH2), 5.10 (d, J = 7.4 Hz,
1H, CHP), 7.20–7.64 (m, 10H, aromatic protons); 13C
NMR d (ppm): 16.69 (d, J = 5.5, CH3), 62.05 (OCH2),
73.79 (d, J = 110.3, CHP), 127.47, 127.50, 128.17, 128.24
(d, J = 2.4), 128.38, 128.47, 132.77, 132.83, 133.12, 136.28
(aromatic carbons).
3.5. Microorganisms: growth and biotransformation
conditions
3.3. Synthesis of ethyl butyryloxy(phenyl)methane-
(P-phenyl)phosphinate 2
The strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis,
Serratia liquefaciens and Acinetobacter baumannii were
taken from our own collection. Their taxonomy was previ-
Racemic compound 1 was acylated with butyryl chloride
by the following procedure: 10 mmol of compound 1 was
added to 100 ml of a mixture containing chloroform and
triethylamine (10:1 v/v), followed by the addition of
11 mmol of butyryl chloride. The resulting solution was
stirred for 24 h at room temperature and the product puri-
fied by means of column chromatography as described
above; Rf(2) = 0.73. Ethyl butyryloxy(phenyl)methane(P-
phenyl)phosphinate (1:1 molar ratio) was obtained with
62% yield.
ously analyzed by Deutsche Sammlung fur Mikroorganis-
¨
men und Zellkulturen, Braunschweig, Germany. In order
to achieve the most vigorous growth accompanied by the
best lipolytic activity, several media were tested and the
one of choice is composed of: 10 g of starch soluble, 1 g
of yeast extract, 5 g of (NH4)2SO4, 2 g of K2HPO4, 100 ll
of tributyrin and 1000 ml of distilled water. Microorgan-
isms were incubated for 3 days at 26 ꢁC with shaking at
150 rpm. The cells were then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for
10 min and washed twice in 0.017 M phosphate buffer,
pH 7.0.
3.3.1. Mixture of (RP,R)- and (SP,S)-enantiomers. 31P
NMR d (ppm) 34.93; 1H NMR: d (ppm): 0.87 (t,
J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H,
OCH2CH3), 1.55–1.62 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 2.32 (dt,
J = 4.6 Hz, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, C(O)CH2), 4.00–4.07 (m, 2H,
OCH2), 6.23 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, CHP), 7.25–7.66 (m,
10H, aromatic protons); 13C NMR d (ppm) 13.71
(CH2CH2CH3), 16.68 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, OCH2CH3), 18.45
(CH2CH2CH3), 36.17 (C(O)CH2), 62.12 (d, J = 6.7 Hz,
OCH2), 72.99 (d, J = 117.3 Hz, CHP), 127.76, 127.78,
Biotransformations were performed in 100 ml of 0.017 M
phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 supplied with 50 ll of substrate.
The samples were shaken at 150 rpm at room temperature.
After the process, biomases were centrifuged, the superna-
tant extracted twice with ethyl acetate and dried over anhy-
drous magnesium sulfate. After filtration, organic solvent
was evaporated and the reaction progress and stereoselec-
tivity analyzed by 31P NMR using quinine as a chiral
discriminator.15