LETTER
Work-Up-Free Deprotection of Borane Complexes
2587
protected as the diborane complex without further purifi- under an inert atmosphere. We think that this most
cation (70% total yield).
practical method can greatly facilitate the manipulations
required to convert pre-catalyst into active catalytic spe-
cies in many different types of processes.
Triphenylphosphine–borane complex was used to deter-
mine the optimal conditions for the removal of the borane
group16 (Table 1, entries 1–8). In general, treatment of the
complex with two equivalents of the piperazino resin 1 in
THF or toluene for a few hours at 60 °C is sufficient for
full deprotection (Table 1, entries 1–3). The lower nucleo-
philicity of the supported N-methylpiperazino moiety re-
quires the use of a higher amount of resin 2, but the
removal of borane could be efficiently performed under
the same mild conditions (Table 1, entries 5–7). In addi-
tion, it is worth mentioning that the resins could be simply
recovered for reuse by treatment with Et3N followed by
washing with THF and drying; no decrease in its perfor-
mance is observed after using the same sample three times
(Table 1, entries 4 and 8).
Acknowledgment
We thank the DGI-MEC (CTQ2005-02193/BQU), DURSI
(2005SGR225), and ICIQ Foundation for financial support. We
also thank Prof. Xavier Verdaguer and Prof. Antoni Riera for sam-
ples of the CamPHOS and PuPHOS–borane complexes.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Ojima, I. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis; Wiley-VCH:
New York, 2000. (b) Jacobsen, E. N.; Pfaltz, A.;
Yamamoto, H. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis;
Springer: New York, 1999.
(2) Schmidbaur, H. J. Orgamomet. Chem. 1980, 200, 287.
(3) (a) Crepy, K. V. L.; Imamoto, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2003,
229, 1. (b) Ohff, M.; Holz, J.; Quirmbach, M.; Börner, A.
Synthesis 1998, 1391. (c) Brunel, J. M.; Faure, B.; Maffei,
M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 178-180, 665.
(4) (a) Imamoto, T.; Kusumoto, T.; Suzuki, N.; Sato, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5301. (b) Imamoto, T.; Oshiki, T.;
Onozawa, T.; Kusumoto, T.; Sato, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 5244.
(5) Brisset, H.; Gourdel, Y.; Pellon, P.; Le Corre, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4523.
(6) (a) McKinstry, L.; Livinghouse, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 9319. (b) McKinstry, L.; Livinghouse, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 50, 6145.
(7) For examples see: (a) Williams, D. B. G.; Lombard, H.; van
Niekerk, M.; Coetzee, P. P.; Holzapfel, C. W. Phosphorus,
Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2002, 177, 2799. (b) Schröder,
M.; Nozaki, K.; Hiyama, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2004, 77,
1931.
(8) Anchoring N-Methylpiperazine onto a Merrifield Resin: The
amine (1 mmol) was added to a mixture of (chloro-
methyl)polystyrene (10 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (2.5 mmol) in
DMF (10 mL). The mixture was heated for 24 h at 50 °C.
After cooling the suspension was filtered and the resin was
washed with DMF (4 ꢀ 10 mL), H2O (4 ꢀ 10 mL), H2O–
MeOH (1:1; 2 ꢀ 10 mL), MeOH (4 ꢀ 10 mL), toluene
(4 ꢀ 10 mL), and CH2Cl2 (4 ꢀ 10 mL). The solid was dried
in vacuo for 24 h at 40 °C to constant weight.
In the deprotection of dimethylphenylphosphine (Table 1,
entries 8 and 9) a longer reaction time and harsher reaction
conditions were required. After heating resin 1 in toluene
at 115 °C for 17 hours under an argon atmosphere in a
sealed tube, the conversion was over 70%. Unfortunately,
phosphines with higher basicity like tributylphosphine
could not be fully deprotected under these conditions even
in the presence of a large excess of amine.
Cleavage of the P–B bond in the dppe–bis(borane) com-
plex was almost complete after stirring with five equiva-
lents of resin 1 in toluene for four to six hours (Table 1,
entries 11 and 12); heating for a longer time provided total
conversion (Table 1, entry 13).
Functional groups like acetals or thioacetals were tolerat-
ed by this mild deprotection method. Thus, (–)-DIOP and
chiral phosphines CamPHOS and PuPHOS were easily
recovered from their borane complexes17 (Table 1, entries
16–19). The bis(borane) complex 4 was also fully depro-
tected in a few hours using polymer-supported piperazine
(2.2 equiv) or N-methylpiperazine (4 equiv) as the nucleo-
phile under the same reaction conditions (Table 1, entries
20–22). Recovered resin 2 also provided total conversion
(Table 1, entry 23).
(9) Resin 2 (1% DVB, fmax = 2.15) from (chloromethyl)poly-
styrene (1% DVB, fo = 2.0–2.5 mmol/g). 13C gel-phase
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 40.6, 46.1, 52.9, 55.2, 62.8,
127.7. Anal. Found: N, 5.41; C, 84.82; H, 10.47; f = 1.93
mmol/g.
(10) Vidal-Ferran, A.; Bampos, N.; Moyano, A.; Pericàs, M. A.;
Riera, A.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6309.
(11) Beres, J.; Dodds, A.; Morabito, A. J.; Adams, R. M. Inorg.
Chem. 1971, 10, 2072.
This deprotection procedure is also suitable for phosphin-
ite and phosphite–borane complexes. Triphenylphosphite
was quantitatively obtained after heating with resin 1 in
toluene for 1.5 hours (Table 1, entry 14). As expected, re-
using the same resin sample for the deprotection leads to
no decrease in its efficiency (Table 1, entry 15).
Longer reaction times were required to achieve complete
deboronation in the decomplexation of the phosphinite–
boranes 5 and 6 (Table 1, entries 24 and 25).
(12) (S)-2-[2-(Diphenylphosphino)phenyl]-4-phenyl-4,5-
dihydrooxazole Diborane Complex (4): White solid; yield:
98%; mp 95–96 °C; [a]D27 +26.6 (c 1.00, CHCl3). IR
(ATR): 3064, 2966, 2864, 2385–2262, 1650, 1478, 1434,
1387, 1321, 1168, 1062, 928, 742, 695 cm–1. 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3): d = 0.95–1.98 (br s, 6 H), 3.86 (dd, J = 10.5,
9.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.17 (dd, J = 9.2, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 4.58 (dd,
J = 11.0, 6.7 Hz, 1 H), 7.18–7.21 (m, 2 H), 7.32–7.68 (m, 12
H), 7.70–7.76 (m, 2 H), 7.78–7.86 (m, 2 H), 7.94–7.99 (m, 1
In summary, we have developed a straightforward proce-
dure for the in situ deprotection of borane complexes of
different types of phosphorus compounds by simple treat-
ment with resin-supported piperazines. The phosphine so-
lutions resulting from this protocol can be directly used in
a catalytic application without any manipulation or, if
desired, through simple cannulation to a different flask
H). 31P{1H} NMR (162 MHz, CDCl3): d = 26.9 (br m). 11
B
NMR (128 MHz, CDCl3): d = –36.5 (br m, PBH3), –19.42
Synlett 2006, No. 16, 2585–2588 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York