Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
We then sought to extend this protocol to access a modular
studies of a TA-Au-catalyzed propargyl ester rearrange-
ment.[15] The kinetic data clearly supports the formation of an
alkyne–gold p complex as the turnover-limiting step, and
explained the observed chemoselectivity when using the TA-
Au catalyst (activation alkyne over allene).
À
synthetic platform for six-membered N B cycles (Scheme 1;
C). According to the literature, there are only two reported
examples regarding the syntheses and applications of 1,2-BN-
3-cyclohexadiene (C and D).[7c,3d] For this reason, there is also
little known about this 1,2-aminoborane subgroup, which
alone warrants further investigation.
With this mechanistic insight, we postulate that the
addition of a Lewis-acidic metal cation will aid in the
dissociation of the triazole ligand to yield an active gold
catalytic system. Moreover, it is possible that the presence of
triazole will beneficially assist in the deauration step through
the formation of TA-Au.[16] Thus, the metal-assisted TA-Au
catalysts may achieve improved reactivity with the retention
of stability toward the borohydride. To test this idea, we
charged 3a with a combination of a gold catalyst and other
Lewis acids. As expected, the addition of different metal
cations significantly improved the TA-Au catalyst reactivity.
Finally, with the combination of 10 mol% [(ArO)3PAu(TA-
H)]OTf and 10 mol% Cu(OTf)2, 100% conversion of 3a was
achieved with 4a and 5a obtained in greater than 95% yield.
Furthermore, no conversion of the starting material was
observed when only a Lewis acid was used.[17] Several results
obtained under alternative reaction conditions are summar-
ized in Table 1. Typical cationic gold ([LAu]+; entry 4) gave
poor conversions and low yields of the cyclic aminoborane
because of the rapid catalyst decomposition. The use of
TA-Au alone (entry 2) also gave subdued conversions and
yields because of the reduced reactivity of the gold catalyst.
Interestingly, using PPh3 as the primary ligand, the corre-
sponding TA-Au catalyst gave slightly better yield than
When treating the homopropargyl amine derivatives 3a
and 3b under the previously optimized reaction conditions,
less than 15% conversion was obtained along with complete
gold decomposition (based on 31P NMR data) after 6 hours
(Figure 1b). Moreover, the reaction of 3a gave a mixture of
the 6-endo product 4a and 5-exo product 5a in a 1:1 ratio.
Absolute structural confirmation for the cyclization products
4a and 4b were obtained using single-crystal X-ray analysis
(Figure 2). The structure of product 5 was characterized using
comprehensive NMR analysis (see the Supporting Informa-
tion). Notably, for both 4a and 4b, only cis-isomers were
obtained based on X-ray crystallography and NMR spectros-
copy.
Figure 2. X-ray structures of BN-cyclohexene. Thermal ellipsoids shown
at 50% probability.[21]
This result revealed two major challenges which were
absent in our seminal NB-heterocycle synthesis: a) more
subdued reaction kinetics requiring a more reactive catalyst
which is still capable of withstanding reduction from the
present borohydride; b) poor regioselectivity (desired 6-endo
over kinetically favored 5-exo).
Table 1: Optimization of catalysts.[a,b]
To circumvent these issues, we first re-examined the
general design of the triazole/gold catalyst. As shown in
Scheme 2, the triazole effectively stabilizes the gold cation
Entry Variations from the standard
reaction conditions
Conv. Yield [%] 4a/5a
[%]
(4a+5a)
1
2
3
none
100
70
<70 <55
96
34
2:1
1:1
1:1
without Cu(OTf)2
Other tested M(OTf)n salt
instead of Cu(OTf)2
[c]
4
5
6
7
[Au]=10% LAuNTf2
<40 <18
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
L=PPh3, IPr, XPhos, (ArO)3P
10 mol% [PPh3Au(TA-H)]OTf
without Cu
10 mol% [XPhosAu(TA-H)]OTf
without Cu
63
75
65
48
41
57
10 mol% [(ArO)3PAu(TA-H)]OTf
without Cu
Scheme 2. Proposed new strategy: M+-assisted TA-Au activation.
7
8
9
10
11
[Au]=10 mol% [PPh3Au(TA-H)]OTf
[Au]=10 mol% [XPhosAu(TA-H)]OTf
[Au]=10 mol% [(ArO)3P(TA-H)]OTf
[Au]=10 mol% [(ArO)3P(TA-Me)]OTf
[Au]=5 mol% [(ArO)3P(TA-Ph)]OTf
70
84
90
88
58
34
55
85
84
53
2:1
2:1
2:1
2:1
2:1
through formation of a coordinatively saturated [L-Au-TA]+
complex, thereby reducing the net concentration of
[L-Au]+.[13] This feature explains the observed reduced
reactivity of TA-Au compared to the corresponding [L-Au]+
catalyst.[14] In fact, monitoring TA-Au-catalyzed reactions by
31P NMR spectroscopy showed TA-Au as the dominant signal
throughout the reaction (resting state). Using React IR and
NMR spectroscopy, we recently reported the mechanistic
[a] General reaction conditions: 3a (0.2 mmol), [Au cat.] (5–10 mol%),
Cu(OTf)2 (5–10 mol%), dichloromethane (0.2m), RT. [b] 1H NMR yields
determined using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard.
[c] M(OTf)n =Ga(OTf)3, Zn(OTf)2, In(OTf)3, etc.; Ar=2,4-di-tert-butyl-
phenyl, DCM=dichloromethane, TA-Ph=N1-phenylbenzotriazole.
2
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!