10.1002/anie.201704411
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
group (7g) are tolerated in this protocol, giving the desired meta-
alkylated products in moderate to high yields. A benzylsulfonamide
derivative 1i was also evaluated providing the alkylated product 7h
in 60% yield.
In summary, meta-C‒H arylation and alkylation of
benzylsulfonamide are realized using 2-carbomethoxynorbornene as
the transient mediator and isoquinoline as the ligand. This protocol
features borad substrates sope and functional group tolerance. The
compatiabilty of heterocylic aryl idodies and alkyl idodides is an
important advantage over other meta-C‒H functionalization
protocols . Meta-substituted sulfonate esters, sulfonamides, as well as
styrene derivatives can be obtained via this approach.
Table 4. Meta-alkylation of benzylsulfonamides.[a,b]
Received: ((will be filled in by the editorial staff))
Published online on ((will be filled in by the editorial staff))
Acknowledgement
We gratefully acknowledge The Scripps Research Institute and the NIH
(NIGMS, 2R01 GM102265) for financial support.
Keywords: meta-C–H arylation · alkylation · isoquinoline · palladium ·
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a or 1i (0.1 mmol), 6 (3.0 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (10 mol%),
Isoquinoline (20 mol%), NBE-CO2Me (1.5 equiv), AgOAc (3.0 equiv), DCE (1.0 mL),
100 oC, 24 h. [b] Isolated yields.
sulfonamide
[1]
a) J. Drews, Science 2000, 287, 1960. b) A. Scozzafava, T. Owa, A.
Mastrolorenzo, T. C. Supuran, Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 925. c) L. Levy,
Drugs Future 1992, 17, 451. d) A. Kalgutkar, R. Jones, A. Sawant, In
Metabolism Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Functional Groups, RSC
Drug Discovery Series No. 1, (D. A. Smith, Ed.), RSC: Cambridge, U.K.,
2010; Chapter 5. e) C. Hansch, P. G. Sammes, J. B. Taylor, in
Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 2; Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK,
1990, Chapter 7.1.
a) F. D. King, A. M. Brown, L. M. Gaster, A. J. Kaumann, A. D. Medhurst,
S. G. Parker, A. A. Parsons, T. L. Patch, P. Raval, J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36,
1918. b) G. Kokotos, A. J. Feuerherm, E. Barbayianni, I. Shah, M. Saether,
V. Magrioti, T. Nguyen, V. Constantinou-Kokotou, E. A. Dennis, B.
Johansen, J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 7523. c) F. Sielaffa, E. Böttcher-
Friebertshäuserb, D. Meyera, S. M. Saupea, I. M. Volka, W. Gartenb, T.
Steinmetzer, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4860.
For selected examples of directed ortho-C–H functionalization of
sulfonamides, see: a) H.-X. Dai, A. F. Stepan, M. S. Plummer, Y.-H. Zhang,
J.-Q. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7222. b) M. V. Pham, B. Ye, N.
Cramer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10610. c) W. Ma, R. Mei, G.
Tenti, L. Ackermann, Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 15248. d) W. Xie, J. Yang, B.
Wang, B. Li, J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 8278. e) W. J. Kerr, M. Reid, T. Tuttle,
ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 402. f) D. Kalsi, B. Sundararaju, Org. Lett. 2015, 17,
6118.
The scalability of this meta-C–H reaction was demonstrated by
the meta-arylation reaction. Employing 1k as model substrate in the
presence of 5 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol% isoquinoline, and 1.0
equivalent of NBE-CO2Me, the di-arylated product (8di) was obtained
in 91% yield, along with the mono-arylated product (8mono) in 5%
yield (Scheme 2a). Boc-Protection of the meta-arylated product with
(Boc)2O afforded intermediate 9 in 99% yield. Subsequent hydrolysis
gave the corresponding sodium sulfonate 11 in 85% yield. It is
noteworthy that the Boc-protected 3,5-bistrifluoromethyl aniline
(directing group) can also be recovered in 91% yield. Furthermore,
the intermediate 9 can be readily transformed to other sulfonamides
(13), sulfonate ester (14) in excellent yields (Scheme 2b). These
transformations indicate the versatility of this reaction for
diversifying the benzylsulfonamide containing drug molecules. An
important synthetic application is also demonstrated by the coupling
of 9 with aldehyde under Julia olefination conditions to give the
trans-alkenes 10 in 86% yield, thus providing a new avenue for
making a novel class of meta-substituted styrenes.
[2]
[3]
[4]
For selected examples of template directed meta-C–H functionalization, see:
a) D. Leow, G. Li, T.-S. Mei, J.-Q. Yu, Nature 2012, 486, 518. b) R. Tang,
G. Li, J.-Q. Yu, Nature 2014, 507, 215. c) L.Wan, N. Dastbaravardeh, G. Li,
J.-Q. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18056. d) L. Chu, M. Shang, K.
Tanaka, Q. Chen, N. Pissarnitski, E. Streckfuss, J.-Q. Yu, ACS Cent. Sci.
2015, 1, 394. e) Y. Kuninobu, H. Ida, M. Nishi, M. Kanai, Nat. Chem. 2015,
7, 712. f) H. J. Davis, M. T. Mihai, R. J. Phipps, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016,
138, 12759. g) M. Bera, A. Maji, S.K. Sahoo, D. Maiti, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2015, 54, 8515. h) A. Maji, B. Bhaskararao, S. Singha, R. B. Sunoj, D.
Maiti, Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3147. i) Z. Zhang, K. Tanaka, J.-Q. Yu, Nature
2017, 543, 538.
[5] For examples of Ru(II) catalyzed meta-C–H functionalization via ortho-
cyclometallation, see: a) O. Saidi, J. Marafie, A. E. W. Ledger, P. M. Liu,
M. F. Mahon, G. Kociok-Köhn, M. K. Whittlesey, C. G. Frost, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 19298. b) N. Hofmann, L. Ackermann, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2013, 135, 5877. c) C. J. Teskey, A. Y. W. Lui, M. F. Greaney, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11677. d) Z. Fan, J. Ni, A. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016,
138, 8470.
[6] For other examples of meta-C–H functionalizations through steric or the
electronic influence: a) T. Ishiyama, J. Takagi, K. Ishida, N. Miyaura, N. R.
Anastasi, J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 390. b) J.-Y. Cho, M.
K. Tse, D. Holmes, R. E. Maleczka Jr., M. R. Smith III, Science 2002, 295,
305. c) R. Bisht, B. Chattopadhyay, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 84. d) R.
Scheme 2. Gram-scale reaction and deprotection. Conditions: a) MeONa (2.2 equiv),
MeOH, rt, 24 h; b) Morpholine (2.0 equiv), n-BuLi (2.4 equiv), THF , rt, 5 h; c) PhONa
(2.0 equiv), DMF, rt, 24 h.
3
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.