5262
T. H. Marsilje et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5259–5262
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) i—4-butylphenylboronic acid (2 equiv), CsF
(3 equiv), ((t-Bu)3P)2Pd (5%), dioxane, 120 °C, 15 min; ii—H2, 10% Pd/C, 2:1 MeOH/
EtOAc; (b) i—aromatic aldehyde (1 equiv), NaHSO3 (1.5 equiv), DMA, 140 °C, 1 h;
ii—LiOH (5 equiv), EtOH, THF, 165 °C, 5 min.
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) diethyl malonate (1.5 equiv), NaOMe
(3 equiv), MeOH, reflux, 5.5 h; (b) (i) (2,40-difluoro-30-methylbiphenyl-3-yl)-
hydrazine hydrochloride (0.8 equiv), EtOH, 160 °C, 10 min, (ii) excess NaOH,
80 °C, 15 min; (c) EtOH/4 M HCl in dioxane (1:1), 100 °C, 5 min.
tively it could be installed after the Fisher reaction via a Suzuki
reaction on the corresponding 6-halo synthetic intermediate. All
of the precursor ketones were known in the literature or commer-
cially available except the ketones required for 16–18 that were
made as shown in Scheme 3. The known12 aldehyde 35 was treated
with 2 equivalents of the requisite Grignard reagent in THF and
then oxidized to the ketone 36 using PDC.
Scheme 5. Reagents and conditions: (a) i—dibutylvinylboronic ester (1.5 equiv),
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (4%), Na2CO3 (7 equiv), 4:1 THF/H2O, 80 °C, overnight; (b) RuCl3.H2O
(5%), NaIO4 (4 equiv), CCl4, 3:2 H2O/MeCN, 50 °C, 2 h.
The chemistry to generate analog 20 is shown in Scheme 4. The
bromide 37 was coupled with n-butylphenyl boronic acid under
Suzuki conditions, followed by hydrogenation to afford the dia-
mine 38. This diamine was then oxidatively coupled with the
appropriate aldehyde ester followed by ester saponification to af-
ford the carboxylic acid analogs 19 and 20.
tify molecules with good in vitro activity and chemical stability,
the high cLogP demanded by this scaffold’s TpoR binding pocket
interactions generated compounds with physicochemical proper-
ties (e.g., extremely low aqueous solubility) which precluded this
series of analogs from further pharmaceutical development.
In the case of analogs 26 and 27, the requisite ketone for the
Fisher reaction was prepared as shown in Scheme 5. The known13
ketone 39 was elaborated to the styrene 40 using Suzuki chemistry
and then oxidized to carboxylic acid 41 with RuO4.
References and notes
1. Alper, P. B.; Marsilje, T. H.; Mutnick, D.; Lu, W.; Chatterjee, A.; Roberts, M. J.; He,
Y.; Karanewsky, D. S.; Chow, D.; Lao, J.; Gerken, A.; Tuntland, T.; Liu, B.; Chang,
J.; Gordon, P.; Seidel, H. M.; Tian, S. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5255.
2. Revill, P.; Serradell, N.; Bolos, J. Drugs Future 2006, 31, 767.
3. Bussel, J. B.; Cheng, G.; Saleh, M. N.; Psaila, B.; Kovaleva, L.; Meddeb, B.; Kloczko,
J.; Hassani, H.; Mayer, B.; Stone, N. L.; Arning, M.; Provan, D.; Jenkins, J. M. N.
Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 2237.
In conclusion, we designed and evaluated a series of TpoR ago-
nists derived from
a lead dihydro-benzo[a]carbazole scaffold
which had been deemed unsuitable for pharmaceutical develop-
ment due to inherent chemical instability.1 The instability of the
lead 2 was successfully addressed by compounds which also dem-
onstrated improved potency compared to 2. Members of the scaf-
fold are full agonists of the human TpoR that demonstrate
functional cellular potency <50 nM with analog 21 having equiva-
lent activity in the primary human CFU-mega assay compared to
the clinically efficacious EltrombopagTM. An examination of repre-
sentative lead compounds in a cross-selectivity screen against
4. Jenkins, J. M.; Williams, D.; Deng, Y.; Uhl, J.; Kitchen, V.; Collins, D.; Erickson-
Miller, C. L. Blood 2007, 109, 4739.
5. McHutchison, J. G.; Dusheiko, G.; Shiffman, M. L.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Sigal,
S.; Bourliere, M.; Berg, T.; Gordon, S. C.; Campbell, F. M.; Theodore, D.;
Blackman, N.; Jenkins, J.; Afdhal, N. H.; Bronowicki, J. P.; DeLedinghen, V.;
Dumortier, J.; Encke, J.; Germanidis, G.; Lawitz, E.; Marcellin, P.; Mills, P.;
Poupon, R.; Rustgi, V.; Teuber, G.; Tran, A.; Zarski, J. P. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357,
2227.
6. Erickson-Miller, C. L.; DeLorme, E.; Tian, S.-S.; Hopson, C. B.; Stark, K.; Giampa,
L.; Valoret, E. I.; Duffy, K. J.; Luengo, J. L.; Rosen, J.; Miller, S. G.; Dillon, S. B.;
Lamb, P. Exp. Hematol. (New York) 2005, 33, 85.
7. Duffy, K. J.; Darcy, M. G.; Delorme, E.; Dillon, S. B.; Eppley, D. F.; Erickson-Miller,
C.; Giampa, L.; Hopson, C. B.; Huang, Y.; Keenan, R. M.; Lamb, P.; Leong, L.; Liu,
N.; Miller, S. G.; Price, A. T.; Rosen, J.; Shah, R.; Shaw, T. N.; Smith, H.; Stark, K.
C.; Tian, S. S.; Tyree, C.; Wiggall, K. J.; Zhang, L.; Luengo, J. I. J. Med. Chem. 2001,
44, 3730.
8. Compounds 9, 22–24, and 26 were assayed in the presence of 1 mM Zn rather
than the 25 mM Zn levels present for the other compounds discussed in this
communication. We have noted that there is usually no more than a two-fold
difference between data collected under the two different conditions (data not
shown).
>50 other receptors showed IC50 > 1 lM for all of the receptors
evaluated, indicating that the observed TpoR activity is not simply
due to non-specific hydrophobic binding or aggregation which is a
concern for highly lipophilic lead structures. Clear SAR trends also
support specific ligand interactions with a binding pocket in the
human Tpo receptor. Although we were able to successfully iden-
9. Reiter, L. A.; Jones, C. S.; Brissette, W. H.; McCurdy, S. P.; Abramov, Y. A.;
Bordner, J.; DiCapua, F. M.; Munchhof, M. J.; Rescek, D. M.; Samardjiev, I. J.;
Withka, J. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 3000.
10. Alper, P.; Marsilje, T.; Chatterjee, A.; Lu, W.; Mutnick, D.; Roberts, M. J.; He, Y.
WO2007009120, 2007.
11. Marsilje, T.; Lu, W.; Alper, P.; Mutnick, D.; He, Y. WO2007022269, 2007.
12. Dyke, S. F.; White, A. W. C.; Hartley, D. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 857.
13. Fouad, F. S.; Crasto, C. F.; Lin, Y.; Jones, G. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7753.
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) i—RMgCl (2 equiv), THF, ꢁ78 °C, 1 h, 25 °C,
1 h; ii—CH2Cl2, PDC (1.2 equiv).