3 and the amide side chain 4, which have been successfully
used by Maier for the synthesis of 1.5 In our strategy (Scheme
2), the macrolide 3 could be derived from macrolactone 5,
which in turn could be obtained by cross metathesis of
styrene 6 and alkene 7. The homoallylic alcohol stereochem-
istry in the differentially protected tetraol 7 was planned to
step approach was developed (Scheme 3). The route featured
the KAPA-promoted alkyne zipper reaction8 and the Ph3P-
promoted ynoate to dienoate isomerization, developed by
Trost.9 Treatment of the lithium acetylide of 10 with
paraformaldehyde gave a good yield (87%) of a propargylic
alcohol, which when exposed to the KAPA reagent readily
isomerized to the terminal heptynol 11 (79%). The primary
alcohol in 11 was easily protected as a benzyl ether (KH/
BnBr, 92%), and the terminal alkyne was carboxylated (n-
BuLi/ClCO2Et, 93%) to give ynoate 12. Exposure of
alkynoate 12 to the Rychnovsky variant of the Trost
isomerization (Ph3P/PhOH) cleanly gave dienoate 9 in
excellent yield (95%) and near perfect double bond stereo-
selectivity.
Scheme 2. Retrosynthesis of (-)-Apicularen A (1)
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Dienoate 9 and Its Bishydration
be introduced by the diastereoselective introduction of an
allyl group to the benzylidene-protected triol 8.6 Previously,
we have been successful at preparing protected 3,5-dihydroxy
esters from 2,4-dienoates.6,7 Thus, we envisioned using this
four-step asymmetric bishydration protocol for the prepara-
tion of benzylidene acetal 8 from dienoate 9.
To access useful quantities of dienoate 9, an efficient five-
We next turned to our three-step asymmetric hydration
protocol (dihydroxylation, carbonate formation, and pal-
ladium-catalyzed reduction) to convert dienoate 9 into
δ-hydroxyenoate 14. In practice, dienoate 9 was dihydroxy-
lated under the Sharpless conditions to give a diol, which
(3) (a) Bhattacharjee, A.; Seguil, O. R.; De Brabander, J. K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 1217-1220. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Kim, D. W.; Baati, R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3701-3704. (c) Su, Q.; Panek, J. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2425-2430. (d) Petri, A. F.; Bayer, A.; Maier,
M. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5821-5823.
(4) (a) Lewis, A.; Stefanuti, I.; Swain, S. A.; Smith, S. A.; Taylor, R. J.
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5549-5552. (b) Lewis, A.; Stefanuti, I.;
Swain, S. A.; Smith, S. A.; Taylor, R. J. K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1,
104-116. (c) Graetz, B. R.; Rychnovsky, S. D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3357-
3360. (d) Ku¨hnert, S.; Maier, M. E. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 643-646. (e) Hilli,
F.; White, J. M.; Rizzacasa, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8507-
8510. (f) Hilli, F.; White, J. M.; Rizzacasa, M. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1289-
1292.
(6) (a) Hunter, T. J.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2777-2780.
(b) Tosaki, S. Y.; Nemoto, T.; Ohshima, T.; Shibasaki, M. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 495-498. (c) Smith, C. M.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett, 2003, 5, 1959-
1962.
(7) (a) Hunter, T. J.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1049-1052.
(b) Li, M.; O’Doherty, G. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3987-3990.
(8) (a) Brown, C. A.; Yamashita, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 891-
892. (b) Kimmel, T.; Becker, D. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2494-2496.
(9) (a) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Kim, J. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2659-2660.
(b) Trost, B.; Kazmaier, U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7933-7935.
(5) Although Maier’s endgame seemed ideal for our purpose, his use of
a stoichiometric amount of (CF3CO2)2Hg to set the transannular ether bridge
in macrolide 3 (see ref 3d) was viewed as needing to be replaced with an
environmentally more benign yet equally stereoselective process.
6088
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 26, 2006