S. Taketomi et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 84 (2012) 83–88
85
2.6. ( )-2-Chloro-1-[3ꢀ,5ꢀ-bis(methoxymethoxy)phenyl]ethanol
(3)
OD of 18 at 36 h. Cells (wet, 4.0 g) were obtained from the broth
(100 mL). A mixture of carbon source with glucose (2%) and glyc-
erol (2%) resulted in a slower growth. The conventional incubation
showed an OD (8.0) after reaching the stationary phase, while under
the aerated conditions, the OD was 18.7 at 36 h to give cells (wet,
3.8 g/100 mL).
To a solution of 2a (47.0 mg, 0.17 mmol) in anhydrous MeOH
(260 L) was added NaBH4 (4.4 mg, 0.12 mmol, 0.71 equiv.) at 0 ◦C.
The mixture was stirred for 5 h. The reaction was quenched with
phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, 0.5 M) and the mixture was extracted
with AcOEt. The organic layer was washed with water, dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was
purified by preparative TLC (developed with hexane/AcOEt = 2:1)
to afford ( )-3 (36.6 mg, 77%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): ı 3.46 (s,
6H, OCH3), 3.61 (dd, J1,2a = 8.9 Hz, J2a,2b = 11.2 Hz, 1H, H2a), 3.72 (dd,
J1,2b = 3.3 Hz, 1H, H2b), 4.81ꢀ(dd, 1H, H1), 5.14 (s, 4H, CH3O CH2 ),
2.9. (R)-2-Chloro-1-[3ꢀ,5ꢀ-bis(methoxymethoxy)phenyl]ethanol
(3)
Harvested cells (wet, 6.0 g) of W. californica, from incubation
with glycerol for 37 h at 30 ◦C (OD = 20.0), were re-suspended in
phosphate buffer (pH 6.5, 0.1 M, 30 mL) and glycerol (600 mg).
(0.27 mmol) of 2a was added to the tube. Two tubes were
shaken on a reciprocal shaker (210 cpm) at 30 ◦C for 20 h. At 3 h,
an insoluble precipitate was dissolved by the addition of EtOH
(0.5 mL) for each test tube. After extractive workup as described
in Section 2.7, the residue (150 mg) was charged on a silica
gel column (10 g). Elution with hexane/AcOEt = 3:1 afforded (R)-3
(118 mg, 80%). [␣]D25–25.8 (c 1.00, EtOH). Its 98.4% ee was deter-
mined by HPLC analysis: tR (min) = 32.3 [0.8%, (S)-3], 38.8 [99.2%,
(R)-3]. The spectral data were identical with those in Section
2.6.
ꢀ
ꢀ
6.71 (t, J2 ,4 = 2.1 Hz, 1H, H4 ), 6.73 (d, 2H, H2 ,6 ); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz): ı 50.8, 56.1 (×2), 73.9, 94.4 (×2), 104.6 (×2), 107.3,
142.4, 158.4 (×2); IR: 650, 697, 854, 922, 1026, 1083, 1145, 1289,
1458, 1599, 2956 cm−1. Anal. Calcd for C12H17ClO5: C 52.09, H
6.19; found: C 51.89, H 6.20. HPLC [column, CHIRALCEL® OD-
H, 0.46 cm × 25 cm; hexane-isopropyl alcohol (15:1); flow rate
0.5 mL/min; detected at 208 nm]: tR (min) = 32.3, 38.8.
ꢀ
ꢀ
2.7. Screening of microorganisms for the reduction of 2a
The microorganisms were incubated in the common medium
(100 mL) with glucose as carbon source (5%) in a 500-mL baffled
Erlenmeyer cultivating flask. The flasks were shaken on a gyra-
tory shaker (180 rpm) for 48 h at 30 ◦C. The cells were harvested
by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 1700 × g) for 15 min, and portion of
cells (wet, ca. 500 mg) were re-suspended in phosphate buffer
solution (pH 6.5, 0.1 M, 10 mL) in a test tube, together with 2a
(20.0 mg) and glucose (500 mg). The test tubes were shaken on
a reciprocal shaker (210 cpm) for 48 h at 30 ◦C. The progress of
the reduction was monitored by a TLC analysis: Rf for 2a: 0.55;
3: 0.45 (developed with hexane/AcOEt = 2:1). The broth was cen-
trifuged (5000 rpm, 1200 × g) for 15 min. The precipitated cells
were extracted three times with acetone. The supernatant in the
step of centrifugation was saturated with NaCl and extracted with
AcOEt four times. The combined extract was concentrated in vacuo.
The residue was diluted with brine and extracted with AcOEt
three times. The extract was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and
concentrated in vacuo. The conversion was estimated by com-
paring the area of signals in 1H NMR: ␦ 3.72 (dd, 1H, H2b for
3), 4.65 (s, 2H, H2 for 2a), 6.71 (t, 1H, H4ꢀ for 3) and 6.96 (t,
1H, H4ꢀ for 2a) of this crude product. The residue was purified
by preparative TLC (developed with hexane/AcOEt = 2:1) to afford
3, whose ee was determined by HPLC analysis as described in
Section 2.6.
2.10. (R)-[3ꢀ,5ꢀ-Bis(methoxymethoxy)phenyl]oxirane (10)
To a solution of (R)-3 (807 mg, 2.91 mmol) in ether (27.0 mL)
were added TBAI (42.7 mg, 0.12 mmol, 0.04 equiv.) and aqueous
NaOH solution (2 M, 13.5 mL). The mixture was stirred for 4 h at
room temperature and quenched with phosphate buffer (pH 7.0,
0.5 M). The ether layer was separated and the aqueous layer was
extracted with AcOEt. The combined organic layer was washed with
brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The
residue was charged on a silica gel column (32 g). Elution with hex-
ane/AcOEt = 5:1 afforded (R)-10 (667 mg, 96%). This was employed
for next step without further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): ı 2.69 (dd, J1,2a = 2.5 Hz, J2a,2b = 5.4 Hz, 1H, H1a), 3.03 (dd,
J1,2b = 3.9 Hz, 1H, H2b), 3.40 (s, 6H, OCH3), 3.74 (dd, ꢀ1H, H1), 5.08
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(s, 4H, CH3O CH2 ), 6.57 (d, J2 ,4 = 2.4 Hz, 2H, H2 ,6 ), 6.60 (t, 1H,
H4ꢀ); IR: 693, 836, 922, 1024, 1143, 1212, 1294, 1378, 1457, 1597,
2827 cm−1
.
2.11. (R)-1-[3ꢀ,5ꢀ-Bis(methoxymethoxy)phenyl]-2-(tert-
butylamino)ethanol (1b)
2.8. Pre-incubation of Williopsis californica JCM 3600
W. californica was inoculated in a common medium. With glu-
cose as carbon source (5%, w/v), the gyrotary-shaken culture (30 ◦C,
180 rpm) showed OD (660 nm) = 0.7 with an early logarithmic
growing phase at 12 h. After being its OD to be 8.8 at 24 h, the
growth become slower, but finally the OD reached to be 18 after
72 h, by way of 8.5 at 36 h. Cells (wet, 2.5 g/100 mL) could be recov-
ered by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 1700 × g) for 15 min at the stage
of 36 h incubation. The growth was accelerated, by adding antifoam
(Dow-Corning, FS antiform AFE emulsion, diluted 10 times with
water, 0.5 mL) to the broth (100 mL) and replacement of conven-
tional urethane-foam stopper with perforated filter paper cap when
OD reached 2.3 at 12 h. The amount of wet cells was increased to be
3.8 g from 100 mL of the broth at 33 h. The change of carbon source
from glucose (5%) to glycerol (2%, w/v) brought about a moderate
growth with an OD of 12 at 36 h under the stationary phase. Aer-
ated condition as mentioned above also promoted the growth with
To a solution of (R)-10 (25.8 mg, 0.11 mmol) in anhydrous MeOH
(2.0 mL) was added tert-butylamine (500 L, 4.73 mmol, 43 equiv.).
The mixture was stirred for 24 h at 50 ◦C. Then another portion
of tert-butylamine (400 L, 3.78 mmol, 34 equiv.) was added, and
the mixture was further stirred for 5 h. The mixture was concen-
trated in vacuo, and the residue was purified by preparative TLC
(developed with EtOH) to afford (R)-1b (26.6 mg, 77%). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CD3OD): ı 1.11 (s, 9H, tert-butyl), 2.65 (dd, J1,2a = 4.4 Hz,
J2a,2b = 11.7 Hz, 1H, H2a), 2.71 (dd, J1,2b = 8.8 Hz, 1H, H2b), 4.61 (dd,
1H, H1), 3.43 (s, 6H, OCH3), 5.15 (s, ꢀ4H, CH3O CH2 ), 6.62 (t,
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
J2 ,4 = 2.0 Hz, 1H, H4 ), 6.71 (d, 2H, H2 ,6 ). Regioisomer 11 on which
amine attacked benzylic position: ı 1.02 (s, 9H, tert-butyl), 3.35 (dd,
J1,2a = 8.8 Hz, J2a,2b = 10.9 Hz, 1H, H2a), 3.43 (s, 6H, OCH3), 3.51 (dd,
J1,2b = 4.9 Hz, 1H, H2b), 3.84ꢀ(dd, 1H, H1), 5.14 (s, 4H, CH3O CH2 ),
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
6.58 (t, J2 ,4 = 2.2 Hz, 1H, H4 ), 6.73 (d, 2H, H2 ,6 ).