Organic Letters
Letter
importantly, the transformation occurred also for internal
alkynes incorporating alkyl substituents (e.g., adducts 3pa and
3qa were generated in 73 and 70% yield), albeit at a slower
rate than the reactions involving terminal alkynes. Gratifyingly,
dialkynes 1s−1t and trialkyne 1u were readily accommodated
in the reactions to provide multiple-9,10-dihydroacridine-
bearing compounds in high yields (71−89%). On the other
hand, bis-alkyl alkynes proved to not be competent precursors
for the reaction, essentially leading to decomposition of the
substrate with only traces of the target product 3ra detected.
We then explored the scope with respect to the diarylamine
component (2b−2n), using representative aryl alkynes 1c (R =
CN) and 1g (R = H) as benchmark precursors. In the case of
2,7-substituted 9,10-dihydroacridines (3cb−3cj, 3gd, 3gf, and
3gi), the reaction demonstrated a broad functional group
compatibility from both symmetrical and dissymmetrical
diarylamines to provide the products in medium to high yields
(57−95%). Both electron-donating and -withdrawing sub-
stituents were amenable to the reaction; notably, bromide
substituents were easily introduced to generate products 3ce,
3ci, and 3gi (57−68%), which constitute useful platforms for
further derivatizations. In addition, 4,5-substituted 9,10-
dihydroacridines such as 3ck could be generated in 73%
yield. N-Alkyl diarylamines such as 1l also underwent the
reaction process in high yields (up to 85%), employing both
terminal and internal alkynes (3al, 3cl, 3gl, and 3pl). By
incorporating a naphthyl moiety, we could prepare complex
polycyclic structures (3 cm, 3cn, and 3gn) in yields ranging
from 61 to 87%.
Triarylamines, notably triphenylamine 2o, displayed a
satisfying reactivity with respect to this process to form the
products in medium to high yields (41−93%), regardless of the
electronic demand of the aryl alkyne and its nature (terminal
or internal). Another key feature of this method is that the
reaction of diphenyl sulfide 2r in place of 2a yielded the
corresponding thioxanthene 3cr in 83% yield. In the same vein,
the reaction with diphenyl ether 2s underwent the diarylation
to give xanthene 3gs in 67% yield. However, it should be
stressed that diphenyl ether is less reactive than diarylamines
and diphenyl sulfide, as it was ineffective with highly
deactivated aryl alkyne such as 1c (10% yield after 1 week at
120 °C). Regarding the limitations of this approach, we
noticed that the use of meta-substituted diarylamines (2s and
2t) and triarylamines with nonidentical aryl groups led to the
formation of a mixture of 2 regioisomers that could not be
separated in some cases by flash column chromatography.
To further illustrate the synthetic utility of this method, we
carried out a few postfunctionalizations. As stated above, the
reaction sequence with dissymmetrical diarylamines occurred
with ease to return the corresponding products in high yields.
Those results could be used to our advantage to generate
densely functionalized 9,10-dihydroacridines such as 4
incorporating four different aryl units, following a Ullmann
C−N cross-coupling.16 It also represents a simple way to
circumvent the reactivity issue mentioned with triarylamines.
Additionally, we executed a Pd(II)-catalyzed C−H activation
to convert 3ma into pentacyclic compound 5 in 94% yield.17,18
In summary, we have developed an efficient protocol for the
assembly of 9,10-dihydroacridines and related heterocycles
from inexpensive precursors through the cooperation of HFIP
and a Brønsted acid catalyst. The wide array of substrates
tolerated validates the utility of this transformation as a means
to provide a rapid access to molecules that could find
applications in the field of materials science and photocatalysis.
In addition, the viability at scale of this method was also
demonstrated.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
sı
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
Experimental procedures, characterization data, and
NMR spectra of all new compounds (PDF)
FAIR data, including the primary NMR FID files, for
compounds 3aa−3′gv, 4, and 5 (ZIP)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
■
Vincent Gandon − Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des
Matériaux d’Orsay (ICMMO), 91405 Orsay, France;
Laboratoire de Chimie Moléculaire (LCM), Institut
Polytechnique de Paris, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France;
David Lebœuf − Institut de Science et d’Ingénierie
Supramoléculaires (ISIS), Université de Strasbourg, 67000
Authors
Shengdong Wang − Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des
Matériaux d’Orsay (ICMMO), 91405 Orsay, France; The
Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Key Laboratory of Molecular Target
& Clinical Pharmacology and the State Key Laboratory of
Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
511436, China
Guillaume Force − Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des
Matériaux d’Orsay (ICMMO), 91405 Orsay, France
Jean-Franco̧ is Carpentier − Université Rennes, Institut des
Sciences Chimiques de Rennes (ISCR), 35000 Rennes, France
Yann Sarazin − Université Rennes, Institut des Sciences
Chimiques de Rennes (ISCR), 35000 Rennes, France;
Christophe Bour − Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des
Matériaux d’Orsay (ICMMO), 91405 Orsay, France;
Complete contact information is available at:
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We gratefully thank the ANR (ANR-17-CE07-0003 funding
for S.W. and ANR-16-CE07-0022 funding for G.F.), the
CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, and Université Paris-Saclay for
the support of this work. We used the OCCIGEN high
performance cluster of the CINES.
REFERENCES
■
(1) For selected applications, see: (a) Park, M. S.; Lee, J. Y. Indolo
2568
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2565−2570