ChemComm
Communication
a
Table 2 Values of knr + kisc and kdif of TPPE, PP, and TP in THF and CH2Cl2
to gain further insight into this new fluorescence phenomenon.
In order to reveal the effect of the internal conversion process,14
we intend to synthesize additional soluble TPPE analogs and
investigate their photophysical properties in detail. In addition,
to confirm exciton behaviors, we try to evaluate the photo-
physical properties of TPPE in the crystal or aggregate state.13
THF
CH2Cl2
b
b
kdif
kisc + knr cc
kdif
,
kisc + knr cc,
[104
s
ꢁ1] [107 ꢁ1] [10ꢁ6 mol Lꢁ1] [104 sꢁ1] [107 sꢁ1] [10ꢁ6 mol Lꢁ1
s ]
TPPE 1.0
PP 3.8
TP 3.9
1.2
1.8
1.7
0.74
2.9
3.0
1.0
4.8
4.5
2.6
2.6
2.6
0.66
3.2
3.0
a
b
Notes and references
Measurement at Abs = 0.1 condition. Calculated by the equation:
kdif = 8RT/3Z m3 molꢁ1 sꢁ1
. Concentration at Abs = 0.1 condition.
c
1 (a) H. Tanaka, K. Shizu, H. Miyazaki and C. Adachi, Chem. Commun.,
2012, 48, 11392; (b) K. Tamao, M. Kobayashi, T. Matsuo,
S. Furukawa and H. Tsuji, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1030;
(c) Z. J. Zhao, C. M. Deng, S. M. Chen, J. W. Y. Lam, W. Qin,
P. Lu, Z. M. Wang, H. S. Kwok, Y. G. Ma, H. Y. Qiu and B. Z. Tang,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8847; (d) W. R. Lian, C. Ho, Y. C. Huang,
Y. A. Liao, K. L. Wang, D. J. Liaw, K. R. Lee and J. Y. Lai, J. Polym. Sci.,
Part A: Polym. Chem., 2011, 49, 5350; (e) H. H. Huang, C. Prabhakar,
K. C. Tang, P. T. Chou, G. J. Huang and J. S. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2011, 133, 8028; ( f ) J. Teetsov and M. A. Fox, J. Mater. Chem., 1999,
9, 2117; (g) T. Yamamoto, K. Sugiyama, T. Kushida, T. Inoue and
T. Kanbara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 3930; (h) T. M. Figueira-
Duarte and K. Mu¨llen, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 7260.
explanations for the increase in quantum yield for TPPE: the
value of kisc + knr decreased in THF only, or the value of the
radiative rate constant kf increased. We considered the follow-
ing possibilities for the decrease in the value of kisc + knr: (1)
intramolecular fluorescence quenching and non-radiative
decay were prevented by energy transfer among the degenerate
chromophores, and (2) given that the values kisc of TPPE and
model compounds were quite similar, the internal conversion
process, which is contained in knr, was suppressed by the
fixation of the dyes. In the model compounds, intermolecular
fluorescence quenching could not occur; it was impossible for
intermolecular fluorescence quenching of TP to occur under the
same absorption conditions because its value for kisc + knr was
about 103 times higher than the diffusion rate kdif, as deter-
mined by the molecular diffusion equation at room tempera-
ture in THF solution (Table 2).
From Table 2, it can also be observed that the fluorescence
rate constants (kf) of TPPE were higher than those of the model
compounds. Furthermore, as solvatochromic effects, the
fluorescence inactivation rate constant (kisc + knr) of TPPE was
lower than that of the model compound only in THF. We
surmised that each phenylpyrene moiety on TPPE was separated
from the others because the shapes of the spectra were quite
similar to those of the models. Nevertheless, the reaction rates
changed. This may be because the rate of increase in the
quantum yield was highest in THF. This is an interesting issue
that we will continue to investigate in the future.
2 M. Uchimura, Y. Watanabe, F. Araoka, J. Watanabe, H. Takezoe and
G. Konishi, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 4473.
3 (a) R. W. Sinkeldam, N. J. Greco and Y. Tor, Chem. Rev., 2010,
110, 2579; (b) A. V. Strizhak, V. Y. Postupalenko, V. V. Shvadchak,
N. Morellet, E. Guittet, V. G. Pivovarenko, A. S. Klymchenko and
Y. Mely, Bioconjugate Chem., 2012, 23, 2434; (c) J. Cao, C. C. Zhao,
X. Z. Wang, Y. F. Zhang and W. H. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 9897.
4 (a) Y. Yamaguchi, T. Tanaka, S. Kobayashi, T. Wakamiya,
Y. Matsubara and Z. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 9332;
(b) Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Matsubara, T. Ochi, T. Wakamiya and
Z. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 13867; (c) H. Maeda,
T. Maeda, K. Mizuno, K. Fujimoto, H. Shimizu and M. Inouye,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 824; (d) H. Shimizu, K. Fujimoto,
M. Furusyo, H. Maeda, Y. Nanai, K. Mizuno and M. Inouye, J. Org.
Chem., 2007, 72, 1530; (e) Y. Watanabe, M. Uchimura, F. Araoka,
G. Konishi, J. Watanabe and H. Takezoe, Appl. Phys. Express, 2009,
2, 102501.
5 (a) V. Balzani, J.-M. Lehn, J. van de Loosdrecht, A. Mecati,
N. Sabbatini and R. Ziessel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991,
30, 190; (b) G. Blasse, G. J. Dirksen, D. van der Voort,
N. Sabbatini, S. Perathoner, J.-M. Lehn and B. Alpha, Chem. Phys.
Lett., 1988, 146, 347; (c) G. Blasse, G. J. Dirksen, N. Sabbatini,
S. Perathoner, J.-M. Lehn and B. Alpha, J. Phys. Chem., 1988,
92, 2419.
6 Y. Niko and G. Konishi, Macromolecules, 2012, 45, 2327.
´
7 (a) A. Adronov and J. M. J. Frechet, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1701;
At present, we offer two hypotheses regarding the enhance-
ment of the fluorescence quantum yield. One is the suppres-
sion of the vibrational relaxation process by the fixation of the
chromophores on the scaffold. The other is an intramolecular
exciton migration that prevents non-radiative decay.13
´
(b) M. Kawa and J. M. J. Frechet, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10, 286;
(c) W. S. Li, D. L. Jiang and T. Aida, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004,
43, 2943.
8 (a) S. W. Thomas III, G. D. Joly and T. M. Swager, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 1339; (b) Y. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun.,
2009, 4332.
In conclusion, we synthesized a new pyrene dye, TPPE,
based on the tetraphenylethane skeleton, and measured its
fluorescence properties in various solvents. The shapes of the
UV-vis and fluorescence spectra of TPPE and model compounds
(PP and TP) were quite similar. However, the fluorescence
quantum yield of TPPE was about 1.45 times higher than those
of the model compounds in THF solution, although all
compounds had the same number of chromophores (1-phenyl-
pyrene) in solution. Compared to the model compounds, PP
and TP, the fluorescence rate constants (kf) of TPPE increased
9 K. L. Chan, J. P. F. Lim, X. Yang, A. Dodabalapur, G. E. Jabbour and
A. Sellinger, Chem. Commun., 2012, 5106.
10 (a) T. P. I. Sagari, T. Spehr, A. Sieber, T. Fuhmann-Lieker and
J. Salbeck, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 1011; (b) C. Poriel, J. J. Liang,
J. Rault-Berthelot, F. Barriere, N. Cocherel, A. M. Z. Slawin,
D. Horhant, M. Virboul, G. Alcaraz, N. Audebrand, L. Vignau,
N. Huby, G. Wantz and L. Hirsch, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13, 10055;
(c) T. Lei, J. Luo, L. Wang, Y. Ma, J. Wang, Y. Cao and J. Pei, New J.
Chem., 2010, 34, 699; (d) K. Sumi and G. Konishi, Molecules, 2010,
15, 7582.
11 N. Miyaura and A. Suzuki, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 2457.
12 W. Weigel, W. Retting, M. Dekhtyar, C. Modrakowski, M. Beinhoff
and A. D. Schu¨ter, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2003, 107, 5941.
in all solvents. The fluorescence inactivation rate constant 13 R. Katoh, K. Suzuki, A. Furube, M. Kotani and K. Tokumaru, J. Phys.
Chem. C, 2009, 113, 2961.
14 (a) Y. Niko, Y. Hiroshige, S. Kawauchi and G. Konishi, J. Org. Chem.,
(knr + kisc) remained unchanged in CH2Cl2 but decreased in
THF. It is difficult to find a satisfactory explanation for this
2012, 77, 3986–3996; (b) Y. Niko, Y. Hiroshige, S. Kawauchi and
observation at the present time. In our future studies, we want
G. Konishi, Tetrahedron, 2012, 68, 6177–6185.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 3893--3895 3895