Tetrahedral Tetradentate Sulfide Ligand Bridging Pd Atoms
7.60 (d, J ) 2.1 Hz, 3H), 7.23 (d, J ) 8.1 Hz, 3H), 6.83, 6.72
(AA′BB′ system, J ) 8.2 Hz, 12H), 6.44 (dd, J ) 8.4 and 2.1 Hz,
3H), 4.15 (q, J ) 6.9 Hz, 6H), 2.64 (q, J ) 7.5 Hz, 6H), 1.46 (t,
J ) 7.5 Hz, 9H), 1.26 (t, J ) 7.5 Hz, 9H) -2.40 (s, 1H). IR (Nujol,
cm-1): ν(O-H) 3622w.
[(µ4-S){(µ2-OH)Pd2(C∧N)2}2] (3). Anal. Calcd for C68H74N4O6-
Pd4S: C, 54,41; H, 4.97; N, 3.73; S, 2.14. Found: C, 54.16; H,
4.84; N, 3.85; S, 2.51. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 9.28 (d, J )
2.2 Hz, 4H), 7.85 (s, 4H), 7.11 (s, AA′BB′ system, 16H), 7.09 (d,
J ) 8.2 Hz, 4H), 6.45 (dd, J ) 8.2 and 2.2 Hz, 4H), 4.17 (q, J )
6.9 Hz, 8H), 2.69 (q, J ) 7.1 Hz, 8H), 1.28 (t, J ) 7.5 Hz, 12H),
0.97 (t, J ) 7.0 Hz, 12H), -3.82 (s, 2H).
[(µ4-S){(µ4-OH)Pd2(C∧N)2}2] (3). To a solution of 2 (0.050 g,
0.044 mmol) in dichloromethane (25 mL) was added [(µ2-OH)2-
Pd2(C∧N)2)] (0.016 g, 0.022 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 6
h at room temperature. The solvent was evaporated off, and the
yellow-orange residue was washed with diethyl ether (2 × 5 mL),
collected on a frit, and dried in a vacuum. Yield: 0.045 g.
[(µ4-S)(µ2-Cl)(µ2-OH)Pd4(C∧N)4] (4). To a solution of 2 (0.050
g, 0.044 mmol) in dichloromethane (25 mL) was added [(µ2-Cl)2-
Pd2(C∧N)2)] (0.0018 g, 0.023 mmol). The mixture was stirred for
6 h at room temperature. The solvent was evaporated off, and the
yellow-orange residue was washed with diethyl ether (2 × 5 mL),
collected on a frit, and dried in a vacuum. Yield: 0.050 g. Anal.
Calcd for C68H73ClN4O5Pd4S: C, 53,75; H, 4.84; N, 3.69. Found:
C, 53.50; H, 4.47; N, 3.55. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 9.54 (d,
J ) 2.3 Hz, 2H), 8.93 (d, J ) 2.3 Hz, 2H), 7.83 (s, 2H), 7.80 (s,
2H), 7.13 (br, AA′BB′ system, 8H), 7.05 (m, 12H), 6.50 (m, 4H),
4.19 (q, J ) 7.0 Hz, 4H), 4.04 (q, J ) 7.0 Hz, 4H), 2.69 (m, 8H),
1.29 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 6H), 1.24 (t, J ) 7.6 Hz, 6H), 1.10 (t, J ) 7.0
Hz, 6H), 0.95 (t, J ) 7.0 Hz, 6H), -3.63 (s, 1H).
Figure 5. Localization of the critical points around a bridging sulfido
ligand. The bond critical points are represented by black circles and the
ring critical points by white circles.
dricity around the sulfido bridge (ST ) 13.5). The electronic
structure is further characterized by bond critical points,
corresponding to the presence of Pd-Pd interactions in
addition to Pd-S ones (r ) 0.047 and 0.069, respectively).
At variance with complex 3, the two maxima in each Pd2S
plane overlap. Consequently, the bonds in [(µ4-S){(µ2-η3-
C3H5)Pd2(PH3)2}2] surround a ring critical point at the center
of the Pd-S-Pd triangle, r ) 0.040 (compared to r ) 0.020
for 3), and are far from a sp3 hybridization for the sulfide or
from a localized two-center bond conception of the molecule.
Conclusion
In summary, although structures containing S surrounded
by four M atoms are not uncommon, 3-5 are rare examples
of metal sulfides with nondistorted tetrahedral coordination
of S, the first of its kind in palladium chemistry. Their
existence seems to be helped by the ligands sterically
preventing the metals from getting close enough to make
M-M interactions. The sulfide uses its four electron pairs
in an apparently simple coordination to four Pd acidic centers.
Thus, compounds 3-5 are genuine examples of sulfide acting
as a simple tetradentate ligand to four transition metals.
[(µ4-S)(µ2-Cl)2Pd4(C∧N)4] (5). To a solution of 3 (0.05 g, 0.033
mmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) was added 65 µL of HCl (1 M
in diethyl ether). The mixture was stirred for 1 h at room
temperature. The solvent was evaporated off, and the residue was
crystallized from dichloromethane/diethyl ether. Yield: 0.037 g.
Anal. Calcd for C68H72Cl2N4O4Pd4S: C, 53,11; H, 4.72; N, 3.64.
1
Found: C, 52.85; H, 4.56; N, 3.58. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
9.05 (d, J ) 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 6.54 (dd, J ) 2.12 and 6.1
Hz, 1H), 7.11 (d, J ) 6.4 Hz, 1H), 7.05, 6.96 (AA′BB′ system, J
) 8.2 Hz, 4H), 4.09 (q, J ) 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.22 (t, J ) 7.8 Hz, 3H),
2.65 (q, J ) 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.07 (t, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3H). IR (Nujol,
cm-1): ν (Pd-Cl) 269w.
X-ray Structures. Crystal and structure refinement data for 2,
3, and 5 are collected in Table 4. Data in common: Bruker AXS
SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer, φ and ω scans, Mo KR radiation
(λ ) 0.71073 Å), graphite monochromator, T ) 295 K. Raw frame
data were integrated with the SAINT21 program. Structures were
solved by direct methods with SHELXTL.22 Semiempirical absorp-
tion correction was done with SADABS.23 All non-H atoms were
refined anisotropically. H atoms were set in calculated positions
and refined as riding atoms, with a common thermal parameter.
All calculations were made with SHELXTL.
Experimental Section
General Procedures. Literature methods were used to prepare
[(µ2-OH)2Pd2L2] (1).20 C, H, N, and S analyses were carried out
on a Perkin-Elmer 2400 microanalyzer. IR spectra were recorded
on a Perkin-Elmer FT-1720X spectrometer using Nujol mulls
between polyethylene plates. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a
Bruker AC-300 or ARX-300 MHz spectrophotometer.
Reaction of 1 with CS2. To a suspension of 1 (0.500 g, 0.665
mmol) in dichloromethane (60 mL) was added carbon disulfide
(0.120 mL, 2.00 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 2 h at room
temperature. The solvent was evaporated off, and the yellow-orange
residue, consisting of a mixture of 2 and 3, was washed with acetone
(3 × 5 mL), collected on a frit, and dried in a vacuum. Yield: 0.35
g. The two compounds could be separated by fractional crystal-
lization from CH2Cl2/toluene (1:1). In this mixture, 2 is practically
insoluble upon cooling to -20 °C, and 3 is very soluble.
Refinement of the structure of compound 2 proceeded smoothly
to give R1 ) 0.0348 based on the reflections with I > 2σ(I). The
ORTEP diagram is represented in Figure 1, and selected distances
and angles are collected in Table 1.
[(µ3-S)(µ3-OH)Pd3(C∧N)3] (2). Anal. Calcd for C51H55N3O4-
Pd3S: C, 54.43; H, 4.93; N, 3.73; S, 2.85. Found: C, 54.59; H,
4.76; N, 3.75; S, 3.08. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 7.95 (s, 3H),
(21) SAINT+. SAX area detector integration program, version 6.02; Bruker
AXS, Inc.: Madison, WI, 1999.
(22) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL, An integrated system for solVing, refining,
and displaying crystal structures from diffraction data, version 5.1;
Bruker AXS, Inc.: Madison, WI, 1998.
(20) D´ıez, L.; Espinet, P.; Miguel, J. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001,
(23) Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS, Empirical Absorption Correction Program;
University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
1189.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2007 2039